Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Richard Clark
writes On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:51:30 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Richard Clark writes On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:27:54 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: However, this is not the best design for a matching network, they are usually three resistors in either a PI or T configuration. Several manufacturers of precision matching pads might disagree! Hi Ian, I seriously doubt it, but you are free to offer examples. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC + many, many more! Ian. Hi Ian, Perhaps you can share from those many, many more, those which disagree? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC The point I was trying to make was, if the L-pad was 'not the best design for a matching network', why are there so many about? It gives the minimum loss for a match in both directions (with the 43and 86 ohm resistors). What works better? Ian. -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
please need help with delta loop antenna better matching system than gamma match | Antenna | |||
Clemens match modelling | Antenna | |||
Problem with Gamma Match? | Antenna | |||
Gamma match question 6-meter yagi | Antenna | |||
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna |