Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm trying to improve my 6m antenna situation.
The antenna has to be horizontaly polarized and omnidirectional. I'm currently using an inverted V @ 10' & 14w. Last week the band opened up and I had a strong SSB qso into northern Canada, a distance of about 1,450 miles and off the end of the antenna, to boot! I'm thinking - heck - if I can do *that* with such a minimal antenna, what would happen with a loop or halo at 40'? I was thinking about getting a OA-50 from Par electronics but it dawned on me I could save a lot of bucks if I just made a full wave loop. I don't know the design of the OA-50 - would a full wave loop perform better? I could make a horizontal loop with support for $10 easy. Ken KG0WX |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ONLY way you can obtain a horizontal, omni-directional, dipole antenna
is by using a "turnstile" with a 90-degree phase difference between the pair of crossed dipoles. You get a 3dB loss relative to a simple dipole, uniform in all directions. Is this what you really want? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ONLY way you can obtain a horizontal, omni-directional, dipole antenna
is by using a "turnstile" with a 90-degree phase difference between the pair of crossed dipoles. How about an S-curve folded dipole, or a classic "Big Wheel" with three roughly-full-wavelength piece-of-pie elements fed in parallel? -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... The ONLY way you can obtain a horizontal, omni-directional, dipole antenna is by using a "turnstile" with a 90-degree phase difference between the pair of crossed dipoles. You get a 3dB loss relative to a simple dipole, uniform in all directions. Is this what you really want? Hi Reg, I can send you an AO (miniNEC) model of a triangular antenna that has a better omni pattern than a turnstile- or better yet, go to W4RNL's site and do a search under triangular omnis. BTW, to the oriiginal poster: a full wavelength loop does NOT have an omni pattern- its pattern is very similar to a half wave dipole. Dale W4OP |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Check this antenna - equivelant of a 6 meter halo, by K0FF
http://www.qsl.net/k4pwo/sloop.htm and, those are more like 1/2 wave loops (dipole), than full wave loops (which are very high impedence-hard to feed). but what you describe is why 6 meters is called the MAGIC BAND (when its open, its OPEN)! Jim NN7K Ken Bessler wrote: I'm trying to improve my 6m antenna situation. The antenna has to be horizontaly polarized and omnidirectional. I'm currently using an inverted V @ 10' & 14w. Last week the band opened up and I had a strong SSB qso into northern Canada, a distance of about 1,450 miles and off the end of the antenna, to boot! I'm thinking - heck - if I can do *that* with such a minimal antenna, what would happen with a loop or halo at 40'? I was thinking about getting a OA-50 from Par electronics but it dawned on me I could save a lot of bucks if I just made a full wave loop. I don't know the design of the OA-50 - would a full wave loop perform better? I could make a horizontal loop with support for $10 easy. Ken KG0WX |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim - NN7K" wrote in message ... Check this antenna - equivelant of a 6 meter halo, by K0FF http://www.qsl.net/k4pwo/sloop.htm and, those are more like 1/2 wave loops (dipole), than full wave loops (which are very high impedence-hard to feed). Full wave dipoles are hi Z. Full wave loops are in the vicinity of 120 Ohms- from memory- but not omnidirectional when mounted horizontally or vertically. Dale W4OP |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:11:02 GMT, Dale Parfitt wrote:
"Jim - NN7K" wrote in message ... Check this antenna - equivelant of a 6 meter halo, by K0FF http://www.qsl.net/k4pwo/sloop.htm See, also, my home-brew 6M (mobile) halo web pages: http://jonz.net/W3DHJ/6mhalo.html and, those are more like 1/2 wave loops (dipole), than full wave loops (which are very high impedence-hard to feed). Full wave dipoles are hi Z. Full wave loops are in the vicinity of 120 Ohms- from memory- but not omnidirectional when mounted horizontally or vertically. Dale W4OP ....and, then you stack two of'em. Bingo! 60 Ohms. A 'perfect' match -- for selected definitions of "perfect". 73 Jonesy -- whose 3el 6M yagi is omni-directional much of the time... -- | Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux | Gunnison, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | OS/2 __ | 7,703' -- 2,345m | config.com | DM68mn SK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|