Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm pretty new to all of this, so if this is a silly question forgive
me ![]() I thought I'd go ahead and make a 2m Yagi antenna so I can give transmitter hunting a try. (The plan I'm using is made of PVC pipe and 1" tape measures ... simple enough.) The other thing you usually need is an attenuator, to cut the power when you get close. I've got instructions for one of these too, and it's pretty simple -- just a bunch of resistors and double throw switches to activate each stage, all in a shielded box. The values of the resistor are given without explanation, but I'm sure those values were chosen to 1) attenuate the signal by the desired amount and 2) maintain the antenna/radio's impedance of 50 ohms. (I guess I could verify this with a little math if I felt the need ...) With about 5 stages, the total cost of parts is $30-$40 at Radio Shack. Since you're not going to be transmitting through this attenuator anyways (it would just release the magic smoke) then why is it important to keep a good SWR ratio? Couldn't you just take a variable resistor (with an audio/logarithmic taper) and put it in series or parallel (which exactly depends on it's value) with the antenna input, and then adjust as needed until you have a sutiable signal level again? Or would the messed up SWR ratios actually make the antenna not directional anymore or something like that? (http://members.aol.com/homingin/index.html has lots of stuff on transmitter hunting, but no answers to this question. The offset attenuator seems good, however ![]() -- Doug McLaren, "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere." |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you do the attenuation in a single line to your receiver, rather than
in feedlines for individual elements of an array, it won't have any effect on the antenna's pattern or other properties. There are quite a few good reasons for having an attenuator maintain a match -- it makes it possible to have a predictable and repeatable amount of attenuation, it won't disturb other cascaded objects like filters or amplifiers, etc. But for your purpose, a variable resistor should be fine. The only problem you might have is that the amount of attenuation you can get will be limited by the capacitive coupling across the resistor. You could use two pots, or a ganged pot (with one section connected so its resistance increases when the other decreases), with one in series and the other across the line on the receiver side, to increase the attenuation range. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Doug McLaren wrote: I'm pretty new to all of this, so if this is a silly question forgive me ![]() I thought I'd go ahead and make a 2m Yagi antenna so I can give transmitter hunting a try. (The plan I'm using is made of PVC pipe and 1" tape measures ... simple enough.) The other thing you usually need is an attenuator, to cut the power when you get close. I've got instructions for one of these too, and it's pretty simple -- just a bunch of resistors and double throw switches to activate each stage, all in a shielded box. The values of the resistor are given without explanation, but I'm sure those values were chosen to 1) attenuate the signal by the desired amount and 2) maintain the antenna/radio's impedance of 50 ohms. (I guess I could verify this with a little math if I felt the need ...) With about 5 stages, the total cost of parts is $30-$40 at Radio Shack. Since you're not going to be transmitting through this attenuator anyways (it would just release the magic smoke) then why is it important to keep a good SWR ratio? Couldn't you just take a variable resistor (with an audio/logarithmic taper) and put it in series or parallel (which exactly depends on it's value) with the antenna input, and then adjust as needed until you have a sutiable signal level again? Or would the messed up SWR ratios actually make the antenna not directional anymore or something like that? (http://members.aol.com/homingin/index.html has lots of stuff on transmitter hunting, but no answers to this question. The offset attenuator seems good, however ![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug:
To add to what Roy says, I have been able to only get 20 to 25 dB total attenuation at VHF with a single pot. And, the effect he overlooked is that unless you use the exact same electrical length cables, the attenuation will be different for every other configuration. So, if you develop a feel for knob position vs distance while hunting, it will change if you don't use exactly the same cables each time. Haunt the swapfests and evilbay for attenuators. I have seen HP units go pretty cheap. Be careful of Kay brand, as they are known to have bad switches when they get old. If you want to learn the innards, that is a good way, rebuilding a Kay. I think there was an old HP spectrum analyzer main frame with a model number like 853 which you can't give away these days. But, it has a nice rotary attenuator in it, if you find one. Then you just have to dispose of the rest of the box. -- Crazy George Remove NO and SPAM from return address |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another DXCC question ?? | Antenna | |||
Grounding question - this is wierd..... | Antenna | |||
Mobile Antenna Question | Antenna | |||
Question for Roy Lewallen | Antenna | |||
2 meter tv twin (300ohm) J pole question | Antenna |