Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Neil" wrote in message ... MFJ-1792 80/40m Vertical Antenna * Bands: 80, 40m * Power rating: 1.5kW PEP SSB * VSWR: 1.2:1 (typical) * Bandwidth (2:1): Full band * 1/4 wave: 40m radiator * Radiation Angle: Low * Freq. Selection: Automatic * High-Q coil & capacitance hat * Requires radials or ground * Includes heavy duty mount * Requires guying * Height: 10m The MFJ-1792 high performance vertical antenna for 80 and 40m. End loading the most efficient form of loading is used for 80m. It uses a 1.37m top capacitance hat and a high-Q coil and features a full size quarter wave radiator for 40m. MFJ, and high performance should not be used in the same sentence. Box never opened £150. Can deliver to HF convention in Manchester end of Oct, or meet buyer by arrangement or buyer pays shipping costs. Contact |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ® StormTrooper © wrote in message ... MFJ, and high performance should not be used in the same sentence. Hehe too funny! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ® StormTrooper © wrote in message MFJ, and high performance should not be used in the same sentence. "Unlike Dickhead and StormTrooper" !!! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "XL5" wrote in message ... ® StormTrooper © wrote in message MFJ, and high performance should not be used in the same sentence. "Unlike Dickhead and StormTrooper" !!! PLOINK!! XL5 to the kill file.... so sorry..... |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hummmmm, looks like Neil and XL5 post from the same account! Who would have
thought. From: "Neil" NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-62-64-235-181.access.uk.tiscali.com From: "XL5" NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-62-64-235-181.access.uk.tiscali.com MFJ products are junk. Read the reviews on e-Ham sweetheart. You know very little about High Performance, and ZERO about posting on Usenet. "XL5" wrote in message ... ® StormTrooper © wrote in message MFJ, and high performance should not be used in the same sentence. "Unlike Dickhead and StormTrooper" !!! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OMG, we have a "Sybil" in the group.
Who will you be tomorrow? XL10? Yeah, I'd guess you're about as efficient as your MFJ Antenna. ROTFL..... Now, get off of mommy's PC, and get to school. You don't want to be late, ya know. "XL5" wrote in message ... Ooohhhh the insult !! To put you straight, same PC different people posting! As for high performance if you are the bench mark then the rest of us must be classed as super efficient! ® StormTrooper © wrote in message ... Hummmmm, looks like Neil and XL5 post from the same account! Who would have thought. From: "Neil" NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-62-64-235-181.access.uk.tiscali.com From: "XL5" NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-62-64-235-181.access.uk.tiscali.com MFJ products are junk. Read the reviews on e-Ham sweetheart. You know very little about High Performance, and ZERO about posting on Usenet. "XL5" wrote in message ... ® StormTrooper © wrote in message MFJ, and high performance should not be used in the same sentence. "Unlike Dickhead and StormTrooper" !!! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Setting up a vertical antenna | Antenna | |||
FS: Cushcraft MA5V Ham Radio Vertical antenna | Antenna | |||
Ground system for a vertical antenna | Antenna | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |