Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Andrew
They are not complicated enough to need plans for! I have built several, after smashing my fingers a few times on those darn push-ups. One thing I do different now than I did at the beginning was that I feed each section independently. It takes a lot more cable, but it sure makes for a safer install on guyed towers. Albeit a bigger pain playing with all those cables though. Threading a single external cable unit is fairly easy and straightforward and the addition of pulleys rather than cable guides makes it easier to crank up. Internal cable works basically the same way and the cable is still exposed at the pulleys, unless their are rain caps over the pulleys. If your wondering how some are cabled, different companies do it different ways, but the most common is for the cable to be affixed to the lower end of the top section, about 1 foot from the bottom of this section. It feeds through a cable guide or pulley on the top of the next section. From this point the feed varies for internal or external showing cable. The norm is internal. So there will be a cable guide just below the pulley, where the cable feeds back into the inside of the second section. On external fed cables, the cable passes through pulleys or guides about 1 foot from the bottom of the second mast and goes through the mast from one outside edge to the other. On internal fed cables, usually only one pulley or guide is used about a foot from the bottom and the cable passes through the guide and up to the top of the third section where a guide or pully like unto the second section is installed. The cable from the last section is fed to the winch. Needless to say, crank-ups need spacers (bushings) to make way for the cable, so you have to start with larger diameter tubing for the base than on push-ups and work in skipped increments of pipe sizes. I saw something interesting about 3 years ago, a crank up made from a normal push-pole that used a relocatable gear drive instead of cables. I don't know how much weaker it made the push-pole, but it was guyed, so I guess it really didn't matter too much. The fellow took a standard 50 foot push pole and drilled 1/4 inch diameter holes along the length of each section, except the top two, which are easy to push-up anyhow. Then he had a winch like device that had a large cogged gear that affixed more akin to a gin pole, on the mast below the one being cranked up. Once extended, the clamps are tightened and the winch moved down to the next section below the one being cranked up. The guy wires were measured and attached, so when the last section was cranked up, they all reached a certain tautness, that was later adjusted to the proper tension. There is one I would have like to find the workings of. It used water from a garden hose, rather than a winch, to raise the pole. Yet no water remained in the pole after it was erected. I don't know if water was used to drive a winch or if it worked on hydraulics. I wasn't that close to it to see. I do know that the top section raised first and was pinned with a pin and spring. Then the second section was raised and pinned. Too many people around to get near the base to see what was going on and I never saw it advertised anywhere after seeing it. I sorta doubt if it was hydraulic though, as the water pressure would have to be much greater than what a garden hose can supply. And it seems water would be spurting out the pinning holes. Still, it's something to keep pondering on! TTUL Gary |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How did you keep the inner sections from rotating?
Tam/WB2TT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|