Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I need to extend the control cable for my AH-4 tuner. I have lots of Cat 5
Ethernet cable. The four leads to the tuner are Key, Start, +13.8Vdc, and Ground. I initially hooked up each to each of the four pairs in the Ethernet cable (i.e., Key to Blue/Blue-White). My thinking was parallel each pair so I have less current loss, but I think I blew the capacitance out of the water and the Key/Start pulses are getting smeared along the 100+ foot run. What's the best way to wire things up so to the twisted pairs so any RFI gets nulled out? Ground to each of the 4 White leads, and Key to say Blue, Start to Green, and +13.8V to Orange? That way each twisted pair would have a "signal" and ground. Or I could use the Brown for Ground, and connect the AH-4 factory cable's shield to the four white leads. Which is the preferred route for minimizing RFI or cable capacitance affecting the Start/Key pulse signals? Jon - KB1HTW |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:09:14 -0500, "Jon KB1HTW"
wrote: Which is the preferred route for minimizing RFI or cable capacitance affecting the Start/Key pulse signals? Hi Jon, Use RS-422 components to translate voltage signals into current signals, and then back (at the other end) to voltage signals. If you have surplus twisted pairs, then this will give you the transmission/length requirements. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the info, but I don't think it'll work.
From http://home.comcast.net/~hamlakemn/ah4/ah4.htm (great site for AH-4 info, by the way!) "The AH-4 uses 12 volt inverted logic and an "open collector" transistor to ground to perform signaling. The radio provides 13.8 volts to the tuner. It also provides a START line that is pulled up to 13.8 volts inside the radio. The radio pulls the START line to ground to assert the signal (start the tuning operation). Similarly, the AH-4 pulls the KEY line to 5 volts through a 22 kohm resistor/diode combination. The radio also pulls this line to 13.8 volts through a resistor. The AH-4 pulls this line to ground to assert the signal (indicate tuning status to the radio.)." I think it may be more effort than it's worth. Plus, I'm not sure if what I described as the "problem" is really the cause - I just think it was the most likely candidate. I guess I need to check the end of the cable and see if I'm getting better than 12V at the tuner. The author of that website says he's been able to control the tuner using 18 gauge rotor cable up to 60 meters away. My Cat 5 Ethernet cable is probably 24 or 26 gauge solid core - that's why I paralleled the leads. Another possible cause why the tuner can't tune any band is that my temporary ground is probably pretty poor. The tuner's on the roof, feeding a long wire - 14 AWG copperweld, ~73' I just tied the RF ground terminal on the tuner to an old 10 AWG aluminum lightning ground wire that goes down to the electrical service entrance of my house. The ground there is a cold water pipe augmented with an 8' length of 1/2" copper pipe driven 6' into sandy/rocky ground. Since the AH-4 is supposedly capable of driving a dipole - with the tuner at the center, I think I'll try stringing up another wire as a counterpoise. Only I don't have 150' linear feet of space on my property, so the dipole will end up being a sort of a "J-pole" being fed at the center... Good thing is that I live on a harbor in Massachusetts, so as soon as the weather's better (like May? ;-( ), I should be able do drive some ground rods next to the seawall, where they'll be in sal****er-saturated sand. Hopefully they'll last a few years... I'm itching to get my IC-706Mk2G up and running HF - 2m/70cm works fine... "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:09:14 -0500, "Jon KB1HTW" wrote: Which is the preferred route for minimizing RFI or cable capacitance affecting the Start/Key pulse signals? Hi Jon, Use RS-422 components to translate voltage signals into current signals, and then back (at the other end) to voltage signals. If you have surplus twisted pairs, then this will give you the transmission/length requirements. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
More info, Richard:
I climbed up on my roof last night (from my 3rd floor balcony - always an adventure!) with a flashlight to check my RF ground - sure enough the old cable had a splice that was broken in one place (that I could find in the dark). So I fixed that. I also verified that the internal fuse of my radio (IC-706) wasn't blown (the tuner connector on the back of the radio still put out +13.8Vdc. When I plugged everything back in, I figured I'd at least be able to tune at least a couple of the bands, but I was met with - nothing. Pressing the Tune button on the radio for two seconds would do absolutely nothing - no changing mode to CW and keying for transmit, not even a short beep saying the tuner couldn't tune the long wire. Just dead. By then my wife was dragging me out for dinner, and it was too late after for any troubleshooting. And this weekend, I'll be out of town, so I won't be able to do any serious troubleshooting during daylight hours for another week and a half. Man, this is frustrating... "Jon KB1HTW" wrote in message ... Thanks for the info, but I don't think it'll work. From http://home.comcast.net/~hamlakemn/ah4/ah4.htm (great site for AH-4 info, by the way!) "The AH-4 uses 12 volt inverted logic and an "open collector" transistor to ground to perform signaling. The radio provides 13.8 volts to the tuner. It also provides a START line that is pulled up to 13.8 volts inside the radio. The radio pulls the START line to ground to assert the signal (start the tuning operation). Similarly, the AH-4 pulls the KEY line to 5 volts through a 22 kohm resistor/diode combination. The radio also pulls this line to 13.8 volts through a resistor. The AH-4 pulls this line to ground to assert the signal (indicate tuning status to the radio.)." I think it may be more effort than it's worth. Plus, I'm not sure if what I described as the "problem" is really the cause - I just think it was the most likely candidate. I guess I need to check the end of the cable and see if I'm getting better than 12V at the tuner. The author of that website says he's been able to control the tuner using 18 gauge rotor cable up to 60 meters away. My Cat 5 Ethernet cable is probably 24 or 26 gauge solid core - that's why I paralleled the leads. Another possible cause why the tuner can't tune any band is that my temporary ground is probably pretty poor. The tuner's on the roof, feeding a long wire - 14 AWG copperweld, ~73' I just tied the RF ground terminal on the tuner to an old 10 AWG aluminum lightning ground wire that goes down to the electrical service entrance of my house. The ground there is a cold water pipe augmented with an 8' length of 1/2" copper pipe driven 6' into sandy/rocky ground. Since the AH-4 is supposedly capable of driving a dipole - with the tuner at the center, I think I'll try stringing up another wire as a counterpoise. Only I don't have 150' linear feet of space on my property, so the dipole will end up being a sort of a "J-pole" being fed at the center... Good thing is that I live on a harbor in Massachusetts, so as soon as the weather's better (like May? ;-( ), I should be able do drive some ground rods next to the seawall, where they'll be in sal****er-saturated sand. Hopefully they'll last a few years... I'm itching to get my IC-706Mk2G up and running HF - 2m/70cm works fine... |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:58:31 -0500, "Jon KB1HTW"
wrote: More info, Richard: I climbed up on my roof last night (from my 3rd floor balcony - always an adventure!) with a flashlight to check my RF ground - sure enough the old cable had a splice that was broken in one place (that I could find in the dark). So I fixed that. I also verified that the internal fuse of my radio (IC-706) wasn't blown (the tuner connector on the back of the radio still put out +13.8Vdc. When I plugged everything back in, I figured I'd at least be able to tune at least a couple of the bands, but I was met with - nothing. Pressing the Tune button on the radio for two seconds would do absolutely nothing - no changing mode to CW and keying for transmit, not even a short beep saying the tuner couldn't tune the long wire. Just dead. By then my wife was dragging me out for dinner, and it was too late after for any troubleshooting. And this weekend, I'll be out of town, so I won't be able to do any serious troubleshooting during daylight hours for another week and a half. Man, this is frustrating... "Jon KB1HTW" wrote in message ... Thanks for the info, but I don't think it'll work. From http://home.comcast.net/~hamlakemn/ah4/ah4.htm (great site for AH-4 info, by the way!) Hi Jon, I consulted the page you offered and given the timing diagrams I would suggest there are no issues of risetime on leading edges of the logic. The microprocessor appears to be a state machine looking at levels, not edges. Anyway, the timings are extremely long in comparison to any edge issues at these scales. Even with a mile of wire, the timing is too simple to be upset by slope. You should have (or now do) designed this and assembled it on the bench for testing in a warm place (for your sake). Replace the cable so there are NO splices anywhere (if you found one broken, that is pilot error). As for the size of wire. This will never be a problem unless you are running in the 40s of gauge. You MUST however meet the peak current demand. This is for the benefit of the 22 relays. You must confirm the average current demand meets spec too for the benefit of the control circuitry. Skip the attention being placed on the ground lead down. As long as it is long (and on the roof of a three floor home, length is sufficient) it hardly matters, RF-wise, what it ties to. The only point about it going to ground is for the sake of lightning protection (which seems a matter of luck anyway in this configuration). I see no discussion of choking either the transmission line nor the control lines on this page. This is poor coverage (or I simply scanned it too fast). This may/may not change your situation, but using them is standard procedure. Get an O'scope and tie it to the control lines and confirm the timing diagrams illustrated at the link offered. If you have no O'scope, then patch a meter across the lines and at least confirm a twitch of the needle. This won't prove much - unless there is no twitch. The timing suggests this would be long enough to overcome the ballistics of needle mass. If you have a digital VOM, and it offers AC Peak hold reading, this should resolve at least one change of state - it will not distinguish between the fail indication timing waveform and normal operation illustrated at the link however. If you have the bench talent, you could assemble a simple pulse stretcher from ICs to aid in this troubleshooting. If you are very talented, you could assemble ICs to stretch, clock, gate, and resolve the fail indication waveform. An O'scope is far simpler and by far the surest method. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon,
get your control cable choked before trying anything else. You can use a pair of split core ferrite beads. Put them close to the cable's ends to stop induced RF from getting into the circuits.706MKIIG is sensitive to that. Better then, get a larger core diameter and make as many turns as you can fit. Same thing applies when you want to extend the control's head cable. A better option would be to use a shielded cable, not TP. What happens is that your cable works as an antenna, feding RF back into the radio which may cause unpredictable results. In case of the remote control head this simply shuts the radio down when trying to key it. But you still should be able to get away with your existing TP cable if you chop the RF off at both ends. -- Regards, Ivan "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:58:31 -0500, "Jon KB1HTW" wrote: .... I see no discussion of choking either the transmission line nor the control lines on this page. This is poor coverage (or I simply scanned it too fast). This may/may not change your situation, but using them is standard procedure. ... Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Been out of town - haven't had time to try anything yet. What size chokes
would you recommend? I can stop by RatShack on the way home, or possibly detour up to HRO in Salem, NH... Isn't the 706 supposed to use something like 300mW for tuning? Shouldn't this be under the threshold for RF interfering with the tuning control lead? I mean, if I can send Ethernet frames at a rate of 1Gb/s down a Cat 5 cable error free, you'd think I wouldn't have trouble with 300msec pulses... Jon "Ivan Makarov" wrote in message ... Jon, get your control cable choked before trying anything else. You can use a pair of split core ferrite beads. Put them close to the cable's ends to stop induced RF from getting into the circuits.706MKIIG is sensitive to that. Better then, get a larger core diameter and make as many turns as you can fit. Same thing applies when you want to extend the control's head cable. A better option would be to use a shielded cable, not TP. What happens is that your cable works as an antenna, feding RF back into the radio which may cause unpredictable results. In case of the remote control head this simply shuts the radio down when trying to key it. But you still should be able to get away with your existing TP cable if you chop the RF off at both ends. -- Regards, Ivan "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:58:31 -0500, "Jon KB1HTW" wrote: ... I see no discussion of choking either the transmission line nor the control lines on this page. This is poor coverage (or I simply scanned it too fast). This may/may not change your situation, but using them is standard procedure. .. Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:09:14 -0500, Jon KB1HTW wrote:
I need to extend the control cable for my AH-4 tuner. I have lots of Cat 5 Ethernet cable. The four leads to the tuner are Key, Start, +13.8Vdc, and Ground. I initially hooked up each to each of the four pairs in the Ethernet cable (i.e., Key to Blue/Blue-White). My thinking was parallel each pair so I have less current loss, but I think I blew the capacitance out of the water and the Key/Start pulses are getting smeared along the 100+ foot run. What's the best way to wire things up so to the twisted pairs so any RFI gets nulled out? Ground to each of the 4 White leads, and Key to say Blue, Start to Green, and +13.8V to Orange? That way each twisted pair would have a "signal" and ground. Or I could use the Brown for Ground, and connect the AH-4 factory cable's shield to the four white leads. Which is the preferred route for minimizing RFI or cable capacitance affecting the Start/Key pulse signals? Jon - KB1HTW Try using a shielded 4 conductor cable. All the stuff about ferrites is good but if you can prevent pickup in the first place, that is better. Also try ferrite beads on the ICOM interface control wires inside the tuner. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I have much used an AH-4 tuner in conjunction with an Icom IC-735 transceiver for 5 or 6 years or more. On all bands 160 to 10m. The tuner has always been located at the base of various end-fed antennas. The tuner control unit has always been bolted, as intended, to the side of transceiver. The transceiver has been used in three different rooms, at different times, in the house with varying lengths of control cable and coax running through 1" holes in brick walls. The control cable to the tuner has varied in length and distance from a few feet to about 30 feet. The system has always worked fine. No chokes, ferrites or anti-RFI measures have ever been used. No RFI has been experienced. No faults have occurred except that one dial lamp in the IC-735 has failed and I'm too old to fix it. The length of control cable has been varied simply by inserting a length of unscreened, thin-wire, pvc-sheathed cable, 5/16" diameter, using soldered joints and an open-to-the-air tag strip. At present there is an excess length of control cable, of unknown length, which is strewn around the floor, partly coiled up, at the back of a long bench. But no TVI. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Had time last night only to take the tuner down off the roof and put it
inside my shack, just inside the window. Extended the long wire another 60+ feet using insulated 14AWG stranded speaker wire running across the roof from the original wire's anchor point on one edge, down to the window, so now it's 135'+. RF ground is now a 45` length of the same 14AWG wire running anong the deck and ground. Opened up the tuner and verified that I have supply sufficient voltage at the tuner (13.7Vdc). Placed sleeved ferrite cores on both the radio end and the tuner end of the control cable. Tried tuning at 40/20/17/6m - still not working. It's a killer when I can only work on it 20 minutes at a time. Hopefully Saturday or Sunday I can try a bit more focused troubleshooting, assuming the coming Nor'easter isn't too bad. I thought I'd try making it drive a balanced dipole (if I can pick up some 450 ohm ladder line this week), 75' each leg. They won't be straight, more like a J with the tuner at the mid-point. "Ivan Makarov" wrote in message ... Jon, get your control cable choked before trying anything else. You can use a pair of split core ferrite beads. Put them close to the cable's ends to stop induced RF from getting into the circuits.706MKIIG is sensitive to that. Better then, get a larger core diameter and make as many turns as you can fit. Same thing applies when you want to extend the control's head cable. A better option would be to use a shielded cable, not TP. What happens is that your cable works as an antenna, feding RF back into the radio which may cause unpredictable results. In case of the remote control head this simply shuts the radio down when trying to key it. But you still should be able to get away with your existing TP cable if you chop the RF off at both ends. -- Regards, Ivan "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:58:31 -0500, "Jon KB1HTW" wrote: ... I see no discussion of choking either the transmission line nor the control lines on this page. This is poor coverage (or I simply scanned it too fast). This may/may not change your situation, but using them is standard procedure. .. Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|