Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can one in theory still transmit if rain
water creates a bridge across the driven element, or even also to 'ground'? A DC short circuit but not a RF short circuit? Or is it just salt water that is worrisome? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:06:25 +0800, Dan Jacobson
wrote: Can one in theory still transmit if rain water creates a bridge across the driven element, or even also to 'ground'? A DC short circuit but not a RF short circuit? Or is it just salt water that is worrisome? I have a multi-band dipole, similar to the fan-dipole. A couple of weeks ago the rain coated my antenna and bridged the gap between center and shield on my coax. My antenna went from matching 80, 40 and 20 to matching 12 and 17. This was short lived, but it lasted long enough for my friend and I to get a good laugh. Typically, without the ice, the weather shifts the center of resonance on my antennas. Sometimes it kills the use of a band or in case of 80 meters, it shifts from the SSB to CW (or visa versa). I threw this antenna up in a hurry and added to it off and on over time. It was supposed to be temporary so I didn't use a balun or weatherproof the so-called cobra-head, which is really only a piece of PVC with three holes drilled in it and the center to one wire and the coax to the other. I also have a properly built 20 meter antenna where I ran the coax into a PVC t-connector and the wires connect at points several inches away so there is no water bridge and the coax stays dry. -- 73 for now Buck N4PGW |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:06:25 +0800, Dan Jacobson
wrote: Can one in theory still transmit if rain water creates a bridge across the driven element, or even also to 'ground'? A DC short circuit but not a RF short circuit? Or is it just salt water that is worrisome? Hi Dan, Water is an insulator, and a very good dielectric. It would make for a very good method for building high valued capacitors (displacing inferior oil), but for one remarkably aggressive characteristic. Water will disassociate many things (act as a solvent or simply as a transport). As such it quickly degrades its dielectric characteristic when in contact with nature. If you were to insert two probes to measure its initial conductivity (presuming you start with distilled, de-ionized water), you would find it easily in the megOhms if you could measure that high in the first place. However, the simple immersion of the probes (depending on their material and time immersed) will lead to increasing that conductivity - such is the aggressive nature of water. Nature is rarely that pristine, so to dwell on de-ionized rain offers its own comedy of failed expectation. So, that is the long way of saying you are on the greasy skids of seeking an all-inclusive answer except to simply offer: don't trust one. Decades of experience, however, yield practical answers. Look at insulator materials and construction geometries. Largely, these two are well tailored to shed water and increase surface area for a fixed length. If you are worried about salt water, visit a marine supplier who sells electrical/RF equipment (hard to imagine they would by shy of examples). These rather simple items reveal how few find water worrisome after their installation. Now, if you want the warm snuggly feeling of data to two or three places, the theory to back it up, and allusions to wave mechanics (be they water or RF). Time and space will enlarge in this forum to allow that easily. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The short answer is that water won't cause any problem, and even salt
water probably won't (except corrosion). When water bridges across a driven element or to the boom (not by any means the same as the Earth), you've put a high value resistor and capacitor across the driven element or from the element to the boom. Pure water is a good insulator but acts also like a lossy capacitor at RF; rain water on an antenna will have some dissolved minerals so that reduces the shunt R. The feedpoint impedance of a beam is quite low, so all you've done is put a high value of impedance across a low value. The change is therefore very small. This holds for half wave dipoles, quarter wave verticals, and most other common antennas, too. A few antenna types have high impedances at the feedpoint, like an electrically short whip, or a full wavelength dipole. Although I don't know of any rigorous tests, I don't think even these are commonly bothered much by water. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Dan Jacobson wrote: Can one in theory still transmit if rain water creates a bridge across the driven element, or even also to 'ground'? A DC short circuit but not a RF short circuit? Or is it just salt water that is worrisome? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The most common problem is if water gets into the traps (if your horizontal
antenna has them) Some traps have drain holes and they should be oriented so the drain hole is downwards A friend had them upwards and the SWR would go way out of sight when it rained, so he was off the air until the traps dried out. We changed them, no problems even in a downpour -- Caveat Lector (Reader Beware) Help The New Hams Someone Helped You Or did You Forget That ? "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... The short answer is that water won't cause any problem, and even salt water probably won't (except corrosion). When water bridges across a driven element or to the boom (not by any means the same as the Earth), you've put a high value resistor and capacitor across the driven element or from the element to the boom. Pure water is a good insulator but acts also like a lossy capacitor at RF; rain water on an antenna will have some dissolved minerals so that reduces the shunt R. The feedpoint impedance of a beam is quite low, so all you've done is put a high value of impedance across a low value. The change is therefore very small. This holds for half wave dipoles, quarter wave verticals, and most other common antennas, too. A few antenna types have high impedances at the feedpoint, like an electrically short whip, or a full wavelength dipole. Although I don't know of any rigorous tests, I don't think even these are commonly bothered much by water. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Dan Jacobson wrote: Can one in theory still transmit if rain water creates a bridge across the driven element, or even also to 'ground'? A DC short circuit but not a RF short circuit? Or is it just salt water that is worrisome? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've noted rain sometimes shift antenna tuning a little bit. But, no big
problem. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan,
It depends on how 'clean' the water is, but in general, there shouldn't be much (if any) changes that can't be compensated for (retune). the biggest problem is that it makes you sound like your under water...(-)(o) 'Doc |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had 2 Comet base loaded 2 meter mobile antennas degrade after a
year or so apparently due to condensation inside the so called sealed base coil. I've now drilled a small weep hole near the bottom in the second one and it seems to be drying out and working again. There is no such thing as a sealed container outside. You need a small hole to let the water out. Water will always get in by condensation. Mark |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
Understanding Shortwave Radio Listening and Antenna Design and Construction | Shortwave | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner |