Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm wanting to build a receive VHF yagi covering the marine band, that is
from 156.025 - 162.05 Mhz (6 Mhz frequency range). I want a design that maximises gain. I would have thought that what I need is a wide-band yagi, but that's all, not a very-wide band yagi. Should I be using OWA design? Or what? BTW, given the frequencies above, what is the yagi bandwith I'd require? I mean, should I be building a yagi described as having a 6Mhz bandwith? TIA. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard" wrote in message ... I'm wanting to build a receive VHF yagi covering the marine band, that is from 156.025 - 162.05 Mhz (6 Mhz frequency range). I want a design that maximises gain. I would have thought that what I need is a wide-band yagi, but that's all, not a very-wide band yagi. Should I be using OWA design? Or what? BTW, given the frequencies above, what is the yagi bandwith I'd require? I mean, should I be building a yagi described as having a 6Mhz bandwith? TIA. Futher: Some time ago I did download 4nec2, and obtained some yagi models. I would have thought that all I have to do is scale one of these models and then make corrections for the physical construction. I managed to catogorise the models thus: DJ6BV OWA SM5BSZ VK3AAU W6SA Wideband Yagi (eg such 220-4eleYagi.nec) Not sue what this design is. Wideband yagi W4NRL Yagi (eg 220-3eleYagi.nec) Not sure what this design is. One of these designs got to be wideband and maximised for gain I suppose. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:12:19 -0000, "Richard"
wrote: Futher: Some time ago I did download 4nec2, and obtained some yagi models. I would have thought that all I have to do is scale one of these models and then make corrections for the physical construction. Hi Richard, If you do this literally so (even to element thickness). Some slop is tolerable in going from one VHF frequency to another, but from HF to VHF you need to scale closely. One of these designs got to be wideband and maximised for gain I suppose. 4nec2 should resolve this - it is its purpose after all. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:45:03 -0000, "Richard"
wrote: I'm wanting to build a receive VHF yagi covering the marine band, that is from 156.025 - 162.05 Mhz (6 Mhz frequency range). I want a design that maximises gain. I would have thought that what I need is a wide-band yagi, but that's all, not a very-wide band yagi. Should I be using OWA design? Or what? BTW, given the frequencies above, what is the yagi bandwith I'd require? I mean, should I be building a yagi described as having a 6Mhz bandwith? TIA. On the receive side, I don't think you need to worry too much. If you create a yagi for the center frequency, you may find very little difference on the ends of the spectrum you want to monitor. The wider spaced the elements, the narrower the bandwidth. I don't know how much, if any, you will notice a difference at the band edges with that beam. Good luck -- 73 for now Buck N4PGW |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:12:19 -0000, "Richard" wrote: Futher: Some time ago I did download 4nec2, and obtained some yagi models. I would have thought that all I have to do is scale one of these models and then make corrections for the physical construction. Hi Richard, If you do this literally so (even to element thickness). Some slop is tolerable in going from one VHF frequency to another, but from HF to VHF you need to scale closely. One of these designs got to be wideband and maximised for gain I suppose. 4nec2 should resolve this - it is its purpose after all. All the models I have are VHF ones. Actually the bandwidth of the marine band, in terms of percentage is 6/159.025 = 3.78%. So, any beam ought to have a useble range of 3.78% at the operating frequency. (I guess though that for any particular design it's bandwith could be a producy of your personal SWR tolerance). I'm not even sure if a yagi I need is just a regular one or a wideband type. Anyway, I guess in truth, of those designs I mentioned, quite a few would be satifactory. ie: DJ6BV OWA SM5BSZ VK3AAU W6SA Wideband Yagi (eg such 220-4eleYagi.nec) Not sue what this design is. Wideband yagi W4NRL Yagi (eg 220-3eleYagi.nec) Not sure what this design is. I think perhaps I could probably go for any, (not sure about that) but folks seem to rave about DL6BV designs and I think they may have a the requied bandwith, but I'm guessing here, not being much of an antenna buff. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard I dont have any *one* Yagi design to recommend for your 160 MHz application. But, I sure do like playing with Yagis. I have a few questions about your design plan for this antenna. The gain from a 3 or 4 element Yagi isnt more than you could get from a omniazimuth colinear array, and I suppose you will prefer vertical polarizathion. Jerry "Richard" wrote in message ... "Richard" wrote in message ... I'm wanting to build a receive VHF yagi covering the marine band, that is from 156.025 - 162.05 Mhz (6 Mhz frequency range). I want a design that maximises gain. I would have thought that what I need is a wide-band yagi, but that's all, not a very-wide band yagi. Should I be using OWA design? Or what? BTW, given the frequencies above, what is the yagi bandwith I'd require? I mean, should I be building a yagi described as having a 6Mhz bandwith? TIA. Futher: Some time ago I did download 4nec2, and obtained some yagi models. I would have thought that all I have to do is scale one of these models and then make corrections for the physical construction. I managed to catogorise the models thus: DJ6BV OWA SM5BSZ VK3AAU W6SA Wideband Yagi (eg such 220-4eleYagi.nec) Not sue what this design is. Wideband yagi W4NRL Yagi (eg 220-3eleYagi.nec) Not sure what this design is. One of these designs got to be wideband and maximised for gain I suppose. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard" wrote I'm wanting to build a receive VHF yagi covering the marine band, that is from 156.025 - 162.05 Mhz (6 Mhz frequency range). I want a design that maximises gain. I would have thought that what I need is a wide-band yagi, but that's all, not a very-wide band yagi. Should I be using OWA design? Or what? BTW, given the frequencies above, what is the yagi bandwith I'd require? I mean, should I be building a yagi described as having a 6Mhz bandwith? TIA. Richard, if you live in an area plagued by pager-interference to the marine-band, you may notice real improvement by a narrow-band yagi. I used to use a wide-band yagi for marine but abandoned it due to its impracticality in trying to cover 300 degrees of traffic from my station location. Even so, with its large front to back separation and fairly narrow directional gain, it did help reduce pager-interference. 73, Jack Painter Virginia Beach, Virginia |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry Martes" wrote in message news:FbsRd.2283$QQ3.1420@trnddc02... Richard I dont have any *one* Yagi design to recommend for your 160 MHz application. But, I sure do like playing with Yagis. I have a few questions about your design plan for this antenna. The gain from a 3 or 4 element Yagi isnt more than you could get from a omniazimuth colinear array, and I suppose you will prefer vertical polarizathion. Jerry Actually maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree. Maybe a co-linear is the way to go. I live about 70 miles from the sea, but maybe a good co-linear is as good as a 4 element yagi. I can receive a marine station from my location, and there is some marine traffic originating from canal boats about 30 miles away. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard" wrote in message ... "Jerry Martes" wrote in message news:FbsRd.2283$QQ3.1420@trnddc02... Richard I dont have any *one* Yagi design to recommend for your 160 MHz application. But, I sure do like playing with Yagis. I have a few questions about your design plan for this antenna. The gain from a 3 or 4 element Yagi isnt more than you could get from a omniazimuth colinear array, and I suppose you will prefer vertical polarizathion. Jerry Actually maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree. Maybe a co-linear is the way to go. I live about 70 miles from the sea, but maybe a good co-linear is as good as a 4 element yagi. I can receive a marine station from my location, and there is some marine traffic originating from canal boats about 30 miles away. Richard Since you have complete control of the performance specifications for this is an antenna you can build almost any Yagi and try it. A 6 db colinear array could be difficult by comparison 70 miles is quite a long didtance for that kind of communication. I hope you are located well above sea level. Jerry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Changing design frequency of K2RIW 432 MHz yagi | Antenna | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
Call for a *practical* design for a 5 or 6 element wideband yagi using a hertz dipole as DE | Antenna | |||
Lightweight yagi antennas as a design philosphy | Antenna | |||
Compact Yagi Design for VHF????????????????????????? | Antenna |