Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many posts under the drifted thread "1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna" give
various views on the physics of generating the maximum safe load power from an RF amplifier. To those posters I present this reality. Modern, solid-state FM broadcast transmitters WITHOUT TUNING OR OTHER ADJUSTMENT will produce their full rated output power into a 50 ohm load at any frequency in the 88-108MHz FM broadcast band, and with ~uniform, and high PA efficiency (80% or better, typically). These transmitters have no resonant circuits in their entire RF chain except for their output lowpass/harmonic filter. It is possible to slew the tx freq from one end of the band to the other in the time it takes for the exciter to lock up on the new frequency (a second or two). This reality seems at odds with many of the declarations made in this NG, and perhaps may inspire some posters to further research their opinions and theories. RF Visit http://rfry.org for FM transmission system papers. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very briefly, what's the point of your apparently scary message.
|
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Richard,
You may have meant this to go to a different group, But I must point out the resonant circuits in the output of the exciter. Usually the exciter has an output lowpass/harmonic filter. But you knew this anyway ![]() "Richard Fry" wrote in message ... Many posts under the drifted thread "1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna" give various views on the physics of generating the maximum safe load power from an RF amplifier. To those posters I present this reality. Modern, solid-state FM broadcast transmitters WITHOUT TUNING OR OTHER ADJUSTMENT will produce their full rated output power into a 50 ohm load at any frequency in the 88-108MHz FM broadcast band, and with ~uniform, and high PA efficiency (80% or better, typically). These transmitters have no resonant circuits in their entire RF chain except for their output lowpass/harmonic filter. It is possible to slew the tx freq from one end of the band to the other in the time it takes for the exciter to lock up on the new frequency (a second or two). This reality seems at odds with many of the declarations made in this NG, and perhaps may inspire some posters to further research their opinions and theories. RF Visit http://rfry.org for FM transmission system papers. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
Many posts under the drifted thread "1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna" give various views on the physics of generating the maximum safe load power from an RF amplifier. To those posters I present this reality. Modern, solid-state FM broadcast transmitters WITHOUT TUNING OR OTHER ADJUSTMENT will produce their full rated output power into a 50 ohm load at any frequency in the 88-108MHz FM broadcast band, and with ~uniform, and high PA efficiency (80% or better, typically). These transmitters have no resonant circuits in their entire RF chain except for their output lowpass/harmonic filter. It is possible to slew the tx freq from one end of the band to the other in the time it takes for the exciter to lock up on the new frequency (a second or two). This reality seems at odds with many of the declarations made in this NG, and perhaps may inspire some posters to further research their opinions and theories. RF Visit http://rfry.org for FM transmission system papers. Read the book _Radio Frequency Transistors Principles and Practical Applications_, by Norm Dye and Helge Granberg. At some point in the book, they go to great lengths dealing with "matching" the input and output of transistors and how to effect broadband matching schemes. They even mention some transistors that are manufactured in such a way as to be internally matched over a particular range of frequencies. It doesn't hurt to read books by guys who know what they're talking about. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Doe" wrote:
You may have meant this to go to a different group, No, this is the group with the "1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna" thread I referenced, and all the statements under it about matching RF amps and loads across different bandwidths. But I must point out the resonant circuits in the output of the exciter. Usually the exciter has an output lowpass/harmonic filter. The practice in top-of-the-line FM systems these days is to use a harmonic filter on the exciter output only if/when it is used as a low-power transmitter directly on the air. Otherwise that filter is redundant, and can reduce the performance of the exciter by a small amount. RF |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So what IS your point?...
Joe W3JDR "Richard Fry" wrote in message ... "John Doe" wrote: You may have meant this to go to a different group, No, this is the group with the "1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna" thread I referenced, and all the statements under it about matching RF amps and loads across different bandwidths. But I must point out the resonant circuits in the output of the exciter. Usually the exciter has an output lowpass/harmonic filter. The practice in top-of-the-line FM systems these days is to use a harmonic filter on the exciter output only if/when it is used as a low-power transmitter directly on the air. Otherwise that filter is redundant, and can reduce the performance of the exciter by a small amount. RF |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"W3JDR" wrote
So what IS your point?... __________________ To show by example that circuits and transmitters exist with capabilities said to be impossible by some posters to this newsgroup. RF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: ICOM 746PRO W/ MATCHING PS-125 POWER SUPPLY | Swap | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Equipment | |||
FS: ICOM 746PROW W/ MATCHING PS-125 POWER SUPPLY | Swap | |||
FS: ICOM IC-746PRO W/ MATCHING PS-125 POWER SUPPLY | Equipment | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |