Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there anyway to down tilt the signal on horizontally polarized omni slot
antenna? I would like to add 1-3 degrees of downtilt. Matt |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Matt" wrote: Is there anyway to down tilt the signal on horizontally polarized omni slot antenna? I would like to add 1-3 degrees of downtilt. Matt Mount the antenna upside down....... Me |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it's a single element, how in the world will you ever measure it
accurately enough to KNOW what the up-or-down tilt is? That is, the directionality of a simple half-wave dipole just isn't enough to matter when you get down to a couple of degrees. In freespace you MIGHT be able to measure things that closely if you were extremely careful, but over practical ground, I don't believe you have any hope. If it's multiple vertically-stacked elements, then arrange the feed so their currents are shifted in phase a small amount from element to element. A back-of-the-envelope picture and some simple trig should tell you just how much phase shift you should have between adjacent elements. Cheers, Tom |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd also think that physically tilting the antenna that much might not
be too much of a trick, and it should give you the tilt you need. As Tom says, it must have a tremendously narrow elevation pattern if you're going to see any significant change with that small amount of tilt. Roy Lewallen, W7EL K7ITM wrote: If it's a single element, how in the world will you ever measure it accurately enough to KNOW what the up-or-down tilt is? That is, the directionality of a simple half-wave dipole just isn't enough to matter when you get down to a couple of degrees. In freespace you MIGHT be able to measure things that closely if you were extremely careful, but over practical ground, I don't believe you have any hope. If it's multiple vertically-stacked elements, then arrange the feed so their currents are shifted in phase a small amount from element to element. A back-of-the-envelope picture and some simple trig should tell you just how much phase shift you should have between adjacent elements. Cheers, Tom |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, let me just post this at the bottom. RCA made a line of VHF TV transmitting antennas which were a slot arrays.
The only one I managed to get close to before it became airborne and clamped a thousand or more feet in the air was for channel 9. It was 80 feet long (2 - forty foot sections) and was constructed exactly as Tom, K7ITM suggested, the phase of the feed of each element was progressively changed, in this case, to effect 1.5° of downtilt. I would suggest contacting RCA TV antenna engineering for their design parameters, but they seem to have gone somewhere. -- Crazy George The attglobal.net address is a SPAM trap. Please change that part to: attdotbiz properly formatted. "Matt" wrote in message ... Is there anyway to down tilt the signal on horizontally polarized omni slot antenna? I would like to add 1-3 degrees of downtilt. Matt |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:04:47 -0600, Crazy George wrote:
Well, let me just post this at the bottom. RCA made a line of VHF TV transmitting antennas which were a slot arrays. The only one I managed to get close to before it became airborne and clamped a thousand or more feet in the air was for channel 9. It was 80 feet long (2 - forty foot sections) and was constructed exactly as Tom, K7ITM suggested, the phase of the feed of each element was progressively changed, in this case, to effect 1.5° of downtilt. I would suggest contacting RCA TV antenna engineering for their design parameters, but they seem to have gone somewhere. -- Crazy George The attglobal.net address is a SPAM trap. Please change that part to: attdotbiz properly formatted. "Matt" wrote in message ... Is there anyway to down tilt the signal on horizontally polarized omni slot antenna? I would like to add 1-3 degrees of downtilt. Matt We had 1 degree of down-tilt on the RCA Slot antenna for Channel 11. Unfortunately I got the task of Replacing Slot covers on the antenna which at the time was 15 years old. The antenna was retired 2 years ago, it was 33 years old... I was 21, and stupid enough to climb a 1000' tower. -- Korbin Dallas The name was changed to protect the guilty. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Crazy George" wrote:
Well, let me just post this at the bottom. RCA made a line of VHF TV transmitting antennas which were a slot arrays. The only one I managed to get close to before it became airborne and clamped a thousand or more feet in the air was for channel 9. It was 80 feet long (2 - forty foot sections) and was constructed exactly as Tom, K7ITM suggested, the phase of the feed of each element was progressively changed, in this case, to effect 1.50 of downtilt. _______________ The antenna described above is the RCA "Traveling Wave" design. Without beam tilt for the situation described, it has an omni, horizontal plane RMS gain of ~17.2X (~12.4dBd) . The beam width within the 3dB points on its elevation pattern is about 3.2 °. If this antenna was placed with its radiation center 1,500 feet above smooth earth, the radio horizon would be 0.59° below the horizontal plane, so using beam tilt would raise field strength there. The 1.5° value stated above exceeds that, but there may have been good reasons for it. Adding beam tilt to an antenna with a very broad elevation pattern, and installed on a short tower is a waste of time and money, however. RF (RCA Broadcast Field Engineer, 1965-1980) Visit http://rfry.org for FM transmission system papers. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for checking in, Richard.
Please refresh my admittedly fuzzy memory from 40+ years ago. Did they (RCA) not adjust the phase delay by using different lengths of dielectric in the inside between adjacent sets of slots? Allowing one size (per channel) of radiator, but allowing selection of downtilt after machining of the exterior. Or was that Dielectric's design? And, that particular antenna never worked to expectations, and I always said I thought it had too much tilt. And indeed it had an extremely strong signal on the ground near the tower. Much more than any other installation I ever visited. P1-9-1324 back then. -- Crazy George The attglobal.net address is a SPAM trap. Please change that part to: attdotbiz properly formatted. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The interior of the VHF TW antenna essentially is a 50 ohm center conductor
against the ID of the pylon. Beam tilt is done by the location of the slots on the pylon. The useful part of the elevation pattern of these antennas is made very smooth (no sharp nulls), and it produces fairly uniform fields near the ground from close to the tower base on out toward the radio horizon. The antenna was designed by RCA (Gibbsboro), and the design and production facilities for it were acquired from them by Dielectric when RCA folded in the mid-1980s. As for the effects of beam tilt, Figure 1 in paper #9 at http://rfry.com gives a graphical representation and discussion of what can be expected. P1-8-3246 (1950s). RF |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Fry" wrote
As for the effects of beam tilt, Figure 1 in paper #9 at http://rfry.com gives a graphical representation and discussion of what can be expected. _______ Sorry, the * CORRECT * URL that should show above is http://rfry.org . RF |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
Understanding Shortwave Radio Listening and Antenna Design and Construction | Shortwave | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
Antenna down tilt in pattern | Antenna |