Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was the whole point. 7700 is out of band.
Tam/WB2TT |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was the whole point. 7700 is out of band.
Tam/WB2TT Yeah, but its two wavelengths, it should probably perform at least as good or better on 40 than it does on 80?? It would most certainly have a lower angle of radiation. Again, I'm no electrical engineer, but I've always been led to believe that the bigger the antenna the better...it should certainly resonate efficiently on 10-80, in theory anyway..in the same way that a full wave is better than a half wave or a quarter wave. See: http://www.ku4ay.net/loop.html and http://www.cebik.com/atl1.html which are just a few of the sites discussing these fine antennas.. Steve kb8viv |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve,
You are right about the gain. I ran EZNEC on the 75 meter loop, and the gain at 40 m is about 3db more than on 75. However, it is not resonant in band. I got an impedance at 3850 of 40 + j5. Impedance at 7700 of 69 +j1, and impedance at 7300 of 18 + j87 (That is an SWR of 10). Gets worse below 7300. There is enough feedline and wire loss in the real world antenna that the SWR measured from the shack is about 5:1 on 40 m. Tam/WB2TT "Desmoface" wrote in message ... That was the whole point. 7700 is out of band. Tam/WB2TT Yeah, but its two wavelengths, it should probably perform at least as good or better on 40 than it does on 80?? It would most certainly have a lower angle of radiation. Again, I'm no electrical engineer, but I've always been led to believe that the bigger the antenna the better...it should certainly resonate efficiently on 10-80, in theory anyway..in the same way that a full wave is better than a half wave or a quarter wave. See: http://www.ku4ay.net/loop.html and http://www.cebik.com/atl1.html which are just a few of the sites discussing these fine antennas.. Steve kb8viv |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are right about the gain. I ran EZNEC on the 75 meter loop, and the gain
at 40 m is about 3db more than on 75. However, it is not resonant in band. I got an impedance at 3850 of 40 + j5. Impedance at 7700 of 69 +j1, and impedance at 7300 of 18 + j87 (That is an SWR of 10). Gets worse below 7300. There is enough feedline and wire loss in the real world antenna that the SWR measured from the shack is about 5:1 on 40 m. Yeah, the rig's not gonna see a 50 ohm impedence, no question about that...It's a compromise I guess...I'll let you know how it does though, I'll be hanging wire this weekend for my 80 meter full wave horizontal loop...but if L. B. Cebik, W4RNL endorses em - thats good enuf for me hehe...he's sort of an antenna guru... Steve kb8viv |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tarmo Tammaru wrote:
You are right about the gain. I ran EZNEC on the 75 meter loop, and the gain at 40 m is about 3db more than on 75. However, it is not resonant in band. I got an impedance at 3850 of 40 + j5. Impedance at 7700 of 69 +j1, and impedance at 7300 of 18 + j87 (That is an SWR of 10). Gets worse below 7300. But notice the subject line compares 40m and 80m, not 75m. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:30:49 -0500, wrote:
Hi group, just wondering.... can I take a 40M delta loop and add an 80M dipole to it? Will there be interaction? SWR problems? Mark W4UDX Hi Mark and All, your Idea of adding a dipole to you 40 meter loop is not a great way to go.. there will be interaction between the dipole and the loop. that will cause you problems on both bands.. The better approach would be to feed the loop with open wire through a good balanced tuner and feed it on both bands.. on 80m for a 40 m loop you may have to open the loop opposet from the feed point . If you have room however to put up a 80 Meter horizontal loop and feed it with Open wire ( Ladder Line) it will play very well on all bands 80-10m. Remember a Horizontal loop will get better take off angel as you move up in frequency. a vertical loop gets worse as you move up in frequency. (that is higher take off angles) I used a 160M horizontal loop here for many years .. until a storm took down too of the trees used for support. But it was a good all round antenna. 73 Dave kc1di P.S. you may want to read up on loops here's a good place to start. http://www.cebik.com/vdelt.html http://www.cebik.com/atl1.html http://www.cebik.com/fdim/fdim5.html |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark,
On 40meters, adding an 80 meter dipole to the 40 meter loop won't 'mess' things up much. It'll change the radiation pattern, make it sort of directional, kinda. No big deal. But, on 80 meters, the 40 meter loop acts like a 1/2 wave 'short' between the two halves of the dipole. SWR goes up close to around 500:1, the transmitter is looking at something on the order of '300R - 2500J'. Not too good, and as for the lower radiation angle, it really doesn't make a lot of difference at that point. 'Doc PS - The 'numbers' are approximate, "close enough for 'gum-ment' work"... |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
'Doc wrote:
Mark, On 40meters, adding an 80 meter dipole to the 40 meter loop won't 'mess' things up much. It'll change the radiation pattern, make it sort of directional, kinda. No big deal. But, on 80 meters, the 40 meter loop acts like a 1/2 wave 'short' between the two halves of the dipole. SWR goes up close to around 500:1, the transmitter is looking at something on the order of '300R - 2500J'. Not too good, and as for the lower radiation angle, it really doesn't make a lot of difference at that point. Doc, ask yourself - why would the 80m signal rather flow into an impedance of 300-j2500 than into an impedance of 70+j0? Answer: it wouldn't. An 80m 1/2wl dipole in parallel with a 40m 1wl loop is a perfectly acceptable configuration as far as feedpoint impedances go. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil, "Horse hockey"! Try it and see what happens. Didn't say model it...try it. 'Doc |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a 40 meter loop inside my 80 meter loop and have been running it for
3 years without any problems. Both antennas are flat (no SWR) and there appears to be little to no interaction between the antennas. 73, Lee - K1NT wrote in message ... Hi group, just wondering.... can I take a 40M delta loop and add an 80M dipole to it? Will there be interaction? SWR problems? Mark W4UDX |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna | |||
Snap-on choke hurts shielded loop | Antenna |