Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Had an experienced Ham claim that rotating an HF yagi in the elevation plane
would give significant signal gain on some signals. Never heard of such a thing Comments please -- CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be ! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
why wouldnt it?
if you raise the directed end of the antenna you are changing the angle of radiation so you would effect the performance of the antenna also effective if you live on a mountain top and want to work the valley if you didnt lower the antenna it would shot right over there heads you aim the antennas Az direction with good effect so why wouldnt elevating the antenna has similar effect? Caveat Lector wrote: Had an experienced Ham claim that rotating an HF yagi in the elevation plane would give significant signal gain on some signals. Never heard of such a thing Comments please |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The simple way to find out is to model it on Eznec/4nec2 etc...
In my mind a HF yagi will never be quite high enough and there will be multiple lobes at differing takeoff angles. Changing the boom angle to the horizontal will tend to change where these lobes point so one would experience a change in gain to stations at specific distances. How much difference I dont know because I dont have a handle on how critical the refraction angle is through the ionosphere. Cheers Bob VK2YQA Caveat Lector wrote: Had an experienced Ham claim that rotating an HF yagi in the elevation plane would give significant signal gain on some signals. Never heard of such a thing Comments please |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dennis Kaylor wrote:
also effective if you live on a mountain top and want to work the valley if you didnt lower the antenna it would shot right over there heads you aim the antennas Az direction with good effect so why wouldnt elevating the antenna has similar effect? I know a ham who raises and lowers his motorized tower in order to vary his take-off-angle for maximum S-meter reading on the receive end - low for domestic, high for DX. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gee Cecil! I have just been convinced that there is nothing you can do to an
antenna to improve communication! I am now content with the notion that propagation controls communication and nothing you can do to an antenna to change that TOA ....Grin Art "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Dennis Kaylor wrote: also effective if you live on a mountain top and want to work the valley if you didnt lower the antenna it would shot right over there heads you aim the antennas Az direction with good effect so why wouldnt elevating the antenna has similar effect? I know a ham who raises and lowers his motorized tower in order to vary his take-off-angle for maximum S-meter reading on the receive end - low for domestic, high for DX. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Gee Cecil! I have just been convinced that there is nothing you can do to an antenna to improve communication! I am now content with the notion that propagation controls communication and nothing you can do to an antenna to change that TOA ....Grin Just ran a 2-element 20m beam at a height of ten feet and got a TOA of 55 degrees. Ran it at a height of 100 feet and got a TOA of 10 degrees. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But all of the R.F fell down in the same place after
hitting the ionasphere Right? Art ![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... wrote: Gee Cecil! I have just been convinced that there is nothing you can do to an antenna to improve communication! I am now content with the notion that propagation controls communication and nothing you can do to an antenna to change that TOA ....Grin Just ran a 2-element 20m beam at a height of ten feet and got a TOA of 55 degrees. Ran it at a height of 100 feet and got a TOA of 10 degrees. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
F.A. New Emoto EV-700X Elevation Rotor / Bargain | Swap | |||
Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
Antenna Rotor Control Burnt Up | Boatanchors | |||
Antenna Rotor Control Burnt Up | Swap |