Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a source run for an inverted L antenna for 80m that is 43 feet
vertical and 23 feet horizontal. What would be the simplest matching network to use to produce a flat match. My primary use would be 80m low angle work at 3.7 and 3.5 Mhz, but also want to be able to use it (with a tuner, of course) for a local net at 3.97 megs. While a 1.7:1 vswr at resonance is usable, I would like to get my starting point as low as possible to maintain some sort of reasonable vswr at the band edges, for those times when I need to check into the net. By simple I mean no caps...they are not all that easy to find (in a hurry) any longer. I need power handling of 500w. My two thoughts are some sort of 1/4 wave transformer (although that's a lot of coax), or a simple toroidal transformer. Any suggestions? Core material for the toroid (including availability), turns ratio, etc? Or is a toroid a bad idea for this app? TIA, ....hasan, N0AN EZNEC ver. 3.0 Vertical over real ground 5/28/2005 6:39:29 AM --------------- SOURCE DATA --------------- Frequency = 3.71 MHz Source 1 Voltage = 29.15 V. at 0.61 deg. Current = 1 A. at 0.0 deg. Impedance = 29.15 + J 0.308 ohms Power = 29.15 watts SWR (50 ohm system) = 1.715 (75 ohm system) = 2.573 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, you can make it a little short and add a base inductor to tap to get
the high end of the band, or you can make it a little long and shorten it with a variable cap. W4ZCB "hasan schiers" wrote in message ... This is a source run for an inverted L antenna for 80m that is 43 feet vertical and 23 feet horizontal. What would be the simplest matching network to use to produce a flat match. My primary use would be 80m low angle work at 3.7 and 3.5 Mhz, but also want to be able to use it (with a tuner, of course) for a local net at 3.97 megs. While a 1.7:1 vswr at resonance is usable, I would like to get my starting point as low as possible to maintain some sort of reasonable vswr at the band edges, for those times when I need to check into the net. By simple I mean no caps...they are not all that easy to find (in a hurry) any longer. I need power handling of 500w. My two thoughts are some sort of 1/4 wave transformer (although that's a lot of coax), or a simple toroidal transformer. Any suggestions? Core material for the toroid (including availability), turns ratio, etc? Or is a toroid a bad idea for this app? TIA, ...hasan, N0AN EZNEC ver. 3.0 Vertical over real ground 5/28/2005 6:39:29 AM --------------- SOURCE DATA --------------- Frequency = 3.71 MHz Source 1 Voltage = 29.15 V. at 0.61 deg. Current = 1 A. at 0.0 deg. Impedance = 29.15 + J 0.308 ohms Power = 29.15 watts SWR (50 ohm system) = 1.715 (75 ohm system) = 2.573 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Harold, but that's not what I'm trying to do. I'm not trying to
broadband the antenna...I'm trying to simply match it...so that starting out at 1:1 instead of 1.7 : 1 will broaden the 2:1 vswr points a bit. I'm going to use a tuner on the band edges anyway. So the only question is: Simplest way (without caps) to match 29 ohms to 50 ohms at the feedpoint. ....hasan, N0AN "Harold E. Johnson" wrote in message news:q1Zle.15771$IC6.11043@attbi_s72... Well, you can make it a little short and add a base inductor to tap to get the high end of the band, or you can make it a little long and shorten it with a variable cap. W4ZCB "hasan schiers" wrote in message ... This is a source run for an inverted L antenna for 80m that is 43 feet vertical and 23 feet horizontal. What would be the simplest matching network to use to produce a flat match. My primary use would be 80m low angle work at 3.7 and 3.5 Mhz, but also want to be able to use it (with a tuner, of course) for a local net at 3.97 megs. While a 1.7:1 vswr at resonance is usable, I would like to get my starting point as low as possible to maintain some sort of reasonable vswr at the band edges, for those times when I need to check into the net. By simple I mean no caps...they are not all that easy to find (in a hurry) any longer. I need power handling of 500w. My two thoughts are some sort of 1/4 wave transformer (although that's a lot of coax), or a simple toroidal transformer. Any suggestions? Core material for the toroid (including availability), turns ratio, etc? Or is a toroid a bad idea for this app? TIA, ...hasan, N0AN EZNEC ver. 3.0 Vertical over real ground 5/28/2005 6:39:29 AM --------------- SOURCE DATA --------------- Frequency = 3.71 MHz Source 1 Voltage = 29.15 V. at 0.61 deg. Current = 1 A. at 0.0 deg. Impedance = 29.15 + J 0.308 ohms Power = 29.15 watts SWR (50 ohm system) = 1.715 (75 ohm system) = 2.573 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "hasan schiers" wrote in message ... Thanks Harold, but that's not what I'm trying to do. I'm not trying to broadband the antenna...I'm trying to simply match it...so that starting out at 1:1 instead of 1.7 : 1 will broaden the 2:1 vswr points a bit. I'm going to use a tuner on the band edges anyway. So the only question is: Simplest way (without caps) to match 29 ohms to 50 ohms at the feedpoint. ...hasan, N0AN "Harold E. Johnson" wrote in message news:q1Zle.15771$IC6.11043@attbi_s72... Well, you can make it a little short and add a base inductor to tap to get the high end of the band, or you can make it a little long and shorten it with a variable cap. W4ZCB "hasan schiers" wrote in message ... This is a source run for an inverted L antenna for 80m that is 43 feet vertical and 23 feet horizontal. What would be the simplest matching network to use to produce a flat match. My primary use would be 80m low angle work at 3.7 and 3.5 Mhz, but also want to be able to use it (with a tuner, of course) for a local net at 3.97 megs. While a 1.7:1 vswr at resonance is usable, I would like to get my starting point as low as possible to maintain some sort of reasonable vswr at the band edges, for those times when I need to check into the net. By simple I mean no caps...they are not all that easy to find (in a hurry) any longer. I need power handling of 500w. My two thoughts are some sort of 1/4 wave transformer (although that's a lot of coax), or a simple toroidal transformer. Any suggestions? Core material for the toroid (including availability), turns ratio, etc? Or is a toroid a bad idea for this app? TIA, ...hasan, N0AN EZNEC ver. 3.0 Vertical over real ground 5/28/2005 6:39:29 AM --------------- SOURCE DATA --------------- Frequency = 3.71 MHz Source 1 Voltage = 29.15 V. at 0.61 deg. Current = 1 A. at 0.0 deg. Impedance = 29.15 + J 0.308 ohms Power = 29.15 watts SWR (50 ohm system) = 1.715 (75 ohm system) = 2.573 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Twelfth-Wave transformer. QST June 1997. pp43
W4ZCB "hasan schiers" wrote in message ... Thanks Harold, but that's not what I'm trying to do. I'm not trying to broadband the antenna...I'm trying to simply match it...so that starting out at 1:1 instead of 1.7 : 1 will broaden the 2:1 vswr points a bit. I'm going to use a tuner on the band edges anyway. So the only question is: Simplest way (without caps) to match 29 ohms to 50 ohms at the feedpoint. ...hasan, N0AN |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
hasan schiers wrote:
Any suggestions? For single-band operation, an autotransformer comes to mind. Wind a coil with about 12 microhenries of inductance. Transmitter output goes to the top of the coil. Ground goes to the bottom. Tap down from the top on the coil for the antenna feedpoint. The transformation ratio is roughly equal to the square of the turns ratio. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() hasan schiers wrote: What would be the simplest matching network to use to produce a flat match. My primary use would be 80m low angle work at 3.7 and 3.5 Mhz, but also want to be able to use it (with a tuner, of course) for a local net at 3.97 megs. EZNEC ver. 3.0 Vertical over real ground 5/28/2005 6:39:29 AM --------------- SOURCE DATA --------------- Frequency = 3.71 MHz Source 1 Voltage = 29.15 V. at 0.61 deg. Current = 1 A. at 0.0 deg. Impedance = 29.15 + J 0.308 ohms Power = 29.15 watts SWR (50 ohm system) = 1.715 (75 ohm system) = 2.573 Hi hasan, If you don't want to use capacitors in your matching circuit, just shorten the antenna a couple of feet. That will add some capacitive reactance at the frequency of interest. Then you can use a shunt inductor to get a 50 ohm match. What you will really have is an "L" network with a series cap and shunt inductor. You tune the capacitor by changing the length of the radiator, and tune the inductor by adding or removing turns. An example, if you shorten the antenna until the impedance is around 29-j25 at 3.71mhz, a 2.5uH shunt inductor will give a 50 ohm match. Gary N4AST |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 May 2005 06:49:15 -0500, "hasan schiers"
wrote: This is a source run for an inverted L antenna for 80m that is 43 feet vertical and 23 feet horizontal. What would be the simplest matching network to use to produce a flat match. My primary use would be 80m low angle work at 3.7 and 3.5 Mhz, but also want to be able to use it (with a tuner, of course) for a local net at 3.97 megs. First of all, changing the match doesn't make the antenna change from a "low angle" radiator to a radiator for local work. While a 1.7:1 vswr at resonance is usable, I would like to get my starting point as low as possible to maintain some sort of reasonable vswr at the band edges, for those times when I need to check into the net. By simple I mean no caps...they are not all that easy to find (in a hurry) any longer. I need power handling of 500w. My two thoughts are some sort of 1/4 wave transformer (although that's a lot of coax), or a simple toroidal transformer. You can use a 1/4 transformer of two parallel RG-59 to get a nearly perfect match at 3.7 MHz. But, you must realize that by doing this you actually *increase* the SWR at the band edges. Any reactive solution will do the same. If you have a tuner anyway, I fail to see why you want to do this. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
a 2:1 balun should get you close.
"hasan schiers" wrote in message ... Thanks Harold, but that's not what I'm trying to do. I'm not trying to broadband the antenna...I'm trying to simply match it...so that starting out at 1:1 instead of 1.7 : 1 will broaden the 2:1 vswr points a bit. I'm going to use a tuner on the band edges anyway. So the only question is: Simplest way (without caps) to match 29 ohms to 50 ohms at the feedpoint. ...hasan, N0AN "Harold E. Johnson" wrote in message news:q1Zle.15771$IC6.11043@attbi_s72... Well, you can make it a little short and add a base inductor to tap to get the high end of the band, or you can make it a little long and shorten it with a variable cap. W4ZCB "hasan schiers" wrote in message ... This is a source run for an inverted L antenna for 80m that is 43 feet vertical and 23 feet horizontal. What would be the simplest matching network to use to produce a flat match. My primary use would be 80m low angle work at 3.7 and 3.5 Mhz, but also want to be able to use it (with a tuner, of course) for a local net at 3.97 megs. While a 1.7:1 vswr at resonance is usable, I would like to get my starting point as low as possible to maintain some sort of reasonable vswr at the band edges, for those times when I need to check into the net. By simple I mean no caps...they are not all that easy to find (in a hurry) any longer. I need power handling of 500w. My two thoughts are some sort of 1/4 wave transformer (although that's a lot of coax), or a simple toroidal transformer. Any suggestions? Core material for the toroid (including availability), turns ratio, etc? Or is a toroid a bad idea for this app? TIA, ...hasan, N0AN EZNEC ver. 3.0 Vertical over real ground 5/28/2005 6:39:29 AM --------------- SOURCE DATA --------------- Frequency = 3.71 MHz Source 1 Voltage = 29.15 V. at 0.61 deg. Current = 1 A. at 0.0 deg. Impedance = 29.15 + J 0.308 ohms Power = 29.15 watts SWR (50 ohm system) = 1.715 (75 ohm system) = 2.573 |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() For single-band operation, an autotransformer comes to mind. Wind a coil with about 12 microhenries of inductance. Transmitter output goes to the top of the coil. Ground goes to the bottom. Tap down from the top on the coil for the antenna feedpoint. The transformation ratio is roughly equal to the square of the turns ratio. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp =============================== Cec, it seldom works. You forgot to mention the most important parameter is the input impedance to the antenna. For an analysis of an inverted-L or vertical antenna, plus tuner L and C component values, download in a few seconds program ENDFEED from website below. No unzipping inconveniences. Run immediately. Easy to use. ---- .................................................. .......... Regards from Reg, G4FGQ For Free Radio Design Software go to http://www.btinternet.com/~g4fgq.regp .................................................. .......... |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
please need help with delta loop antenna better matching system than gamma match | Antenna | |||
Clemens match modelling | Antenna | |||
Gamma match question 6-meter yagi | Antenna | |||
Simple practical designing with antenna modeling programs | Antenna | |||
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna |