Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
. . . I've often thought of modelling a mobile loaded whip in a computer program. Input data would include body dimensions and height above ground. With a lot of patience you could do it with an EZNEC type of program. Many people have done it with EZNEC. At HF, all that's necessary is a pretty crude outline, except in the close vicinity of the antenna where currents can change more rapidly. At VHF and above a much finer wire grid model is necessary. But as others have pointed out, a lot of modern cars aren't covered by a solid metal shell. So it might be difficult for these cars to figure out just what external and internal metallic parts will be carrying the current and therefore need to be included in the model. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, I don't know any more about the antenna than you do, and
hopefully less (since it sounds like you're intending to make use of it). I suggest you contact the vendor for application help. Most manufacturers are glad to provide it. Roy Lewallen, W7EL redhat wrote: Thanks for your reply. what about this patch antenna http://rocky.digikey.com/WebLib/Toko...K1575MS50T.pdf it has a feed pin at the center, the ground is the whole area around the pin , they say it has an adhesive tape for ease in mounting to the ground plane , is this adhesive tape a good conductor so that it connects the antenna ground to the circuit's ground or what? so,in the pcb design should i make a rectangular copper area under this antenna connected to the ground? Regards, Redhat |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Reg Edwards wrote: With mobile verticals what is ALWAYS forgotten about is that the car body is just as much a part of the radiating system as the antenna. I've always considered the vehicle body as a funny looking large diameter elevated radial. :-) That (a single fat radial) might be a reasonable model if the antenna is mounted at one end of the vehicle. If it's at the center of the top, the antenna is more like an asymmetrical dipole, with the "antenna" being one half and the vehicle being a much fatter lower half. In that case the car will produce a substantial vertically polarized field -- perhaps more than the "antenna". Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
That (a single fat radial) might be a reasonable model if the antenna is mounted at one end of the vehicle. My screwdriver is mounted in my GMC pickup trailer hitch hole. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Wes Stewart wrote: On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:57:21 -0000, (Dave Platt) wrote: Similar issues are likely to exist in recent-model cars which have a lot of fiberglass or other composite-plastic panels and structure. Back in the good old days, I was the proud owner of a 1956 Corvette, one of only 3467 built and along with the '57s, the prettiest ones ever buit. (damn I wish I had that car back). As are all Corvettes, it was fiberglass. all corvettes were not fiberglass! The soft top was stored under a flip up hatch behind the seats and there were two toggle clamps that secured the rear of the top when it was up. These penetrated the hatch cover so that it was possible to snake a vertical whip through them. I used a 17" aluminum transcription disk (common in broadcast stations of the day) with the coating stripped off for a ground plane under the hatch. Best DX using a Heathkit "Twoer" was from the driveway of a friend in Tempe, AZ back to another friend in Tucson; about 100 miles. This wasn't long after QST magazine had breathlessly reported that the "difficult path" between Tucson and Phoenix had been bridged. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:19:29 GMT, ml wrote:
In article , Wes Stewart wrote: On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:57:21 -0000, (Dave Platt) wrote: Similar issues are likely to exist in recent-model cars which have a lot of fiberglass or other composite-plastic panels and structure. Back in the good old days, I was the proud owner of a 1956 Corvette, one of only 3467 built and along with the '57s, the prettiest ones ever buit. (damn I wish I had that car back). As are all Corvettes, it was fiberglass. all corvettes were not fiberglass! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ OK, I'm calling bull**** on this one. What production Corvette was not GRP (glass reinforced polyester) or other non-metallic composite? R The soft top was stored under a flip up hatch behind the seats and there were two toggle clamps that secured the rear of the top when it was up. These penetrated the hatch cover so that it was possible to snake a vertical whip through them. I used a 17" aluminum transcription disk (common in broadcast stations of the day) with the coating stripped off for a ground plane under the hatch. Best DX using a Heathkit "Twoer" was from the driveway of a friend in Tempe, AZ back to another friend in Tucson; about 100 miles. This wasn't long after QST magazine had breathlessly reported that the "difficult path" between Tucson and Phoenix had been bridged. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Russ wrote:
OK, I'm calling bull**** on this one. What production Corvette was not GRP (glass reinforced polyester) or other non-metallic composite? I know very little about this, but a few months ago I was fascinated by a half hour program about the history of the Corvette on public TV. (It's one of a series.) Turns out that the first couple of 'vettes weren't muscle cars at all, but gutless wonders with a small engine and two-speed automatic transmission -- it took a while to evolve. I don't recall for sure, but think it's likely those were metal. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy:
You are right on target, I would have to ask my dad, but back around 1960 he had a 1956 vet (if I remember the year correctly--it was a 4 speed--again, if I remember correctly--that is really pressing my memory though--could easily be wrong)... it was an all aluminum body (sure about that), had a big engine, stick shift, and he never got out of second gear in town... however, it did NOT seem gutless to me... nor him as I remember it... he could have had a larger engine placed it it though... he had it for many years... sold it in the 70's for way more than he bought it for!!! ... he claims it was the only car he ever got a ticket in, and more than one... John "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Russ wrote: OK, I'm calling bull**** on this one. What production Corvette was not GRP (glass reinforced polyester) or other non-metallic composite? I know very little about this, but a few months ago I was fascinated by a half hour program about the history of the Corvette on public TV. (It's one of a series.) Turns out that the first couple of 'vettes weren't muscle cars at all, but gutless wonders with a small engine and two-speed automatic transmission -- it took a while to evolve. I don't recall for sure, but think it's likely those were metal. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
Turns out that the first couple of 'vettes weren't muscle cars at all, but gutless wonders with a small engine and two-speed automatic transmission -- it took a while to evolve. I don't recall for sure, but think it's likely those were metal. Don't know about the body but it had virtually the same 6 cyl engine and transmission as my uncle's 1955 Chevy Bel Aire. Chevy introduced the V8 (350 in^3?) in 1956 and that's when it went into the Corvette and into all those Chevys that broke all the records that year. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
You are right on target, I would have to ask my dad, but back around 1960 he had a 1956 vet ... however, it did NOT seem gutless to me... The Corvette was introduced in 1955 with Chevy's old straight six engine. I remember it in a Mike Hammer movie, "Kiss Me Deadly". The 1956 models got that first short stroke V8 which was the grandfather of the engine in my daughter's 2003 Chevy Tahoe. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Antenna | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
ground plane for a magnetic mount cellular antenna | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
This product any good? | Scanner |