Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had a 20 meter dipole about 65 feet over the house. The antenna had
a flat swr on 14.336 where I often hang out. On the low end, it was too high to use below 14.020 so I only lost use of a portion of the extra portion without a tuner. (flat defined as according to the 706 MKII internal meter.) This evening I cut a pair of wires 4.5 feet long each. I added them to the 20 meter connection center connection at the coax and let them hang about 8 inches below the 20 meter wire. I also changed coax from cable-tv coax to RG-8 foam. I rearanged the antenna just a little with also allowed for an additional 10 feet of height. I now have a 20/6 meter dipole at about 75 feet high with the legs pointed almost exactly east and west.. 20 meters is now flat at 14.030 and the top edge of the band is only 1.3:1. The 6 meter dipole turned out to be flat on 50.1. So far, I am quite happy with the antenna. I am having a 6 meter QSO as I write this. (The other party loves to talk and hasn't unkeyed for at least 5 full minutes.) Based on our current conversation, It appears that my next antenna will be a loop. Comments are welcome, Thank you, -- 73 for now Buck N4PGW |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a good example of the ham spirit of experimentation.
A different antenna design might start with someone saying "I wonder how it would work if I made this change.".. I tried a different style once - multiple home-made coils on a long antenna - I need to revisit that experiment now that I have the MFJ Antenna Analyzer. "Buck" wrote in message ... I had a 20 meter dipole about 65 feet over the house. The antenna had a flat swr on 14.336 where I often hang out. On the low end, it was too high to use below 14.020 so I only lost use of a portion of the extra portion without a tuner. (flat defined as according to the 706 MKII internal meter.) This evening I cut a pair of wires 4.5 feet long each. I added them to the 20 meter connection center connection at the coax and let them hang about 8 inches below the 20 meter wire. I also changed coax from cable-tv coax to RG-8 foam. I rearanged the antenna just a little with also allowed for an additional 10 feet of height. I now have a 20/6 meter dipole at about 75 feet high with the legs pointed almost exactly east and west.. 20 meters is now flat at 14.030 and the top edge of the band is only 1.3:1. The 6 meter dipole turned out to be flat on 50.1. So far, I am quite happy with the antenna. I am having a 6 meter QSO as I write this. (The other party loves to talk and hasn't unkeyed for at least 5 full minutes.) Based on our current conversation, It appears that my next antenna will be a loop. Comments are welcome, Thank you, -- 73 for now Buck N4PGW |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Based on our current conversation, It appears that my next antenna
will be a loop. Comments are welcome, Ok...Live a little...Build a yagi for 6m...Will smoke the dipoles and loops, etc...I built a 3 el NBS yagi all from hard drawn copper tubing. I think it cost about $20 or so for the tubing...I built it all one piece using a torch to weld the elements to the copper boom. The elements are 1/2 inch. The boom , 1 inch I think... Actually on 6m, anything is probably ok...But my 706 does not like big wire antennas. Brings in too much HF signals, and trashes the receiver..Using the yagi, it's pretty clean. You'd probably see the same thing, being you are using the same radio...Mine is a mk2g, but 6m is probably the same appx circuit...Myself, I don't see a loop really being much better than a dipole..There won't be any mistake switching to a yagi... ![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The trouble with a 2 or more element yagi is it has to be rotatable.
Simple dipoles and loops do not. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We did some
experimenting and discovered he gains one s-unit by using the beam pointed at me vs using the 80 meter loop. Not unusual really...The big HF antennas have quite a bit of gain in some directions...Some other direction, it might be a dud though...Wonder how much gain his "log" has...Most are fairly average, being they are covering a pretty wide range. On the other hand, my 3 el is set up for maximum gain..About 9.4 dbi, or about 7.25 or so dbd. He may have that much gain, if he has quite a few elements. I'm probably getting more bang per buck per pound of metal, at that one frequency...I often talk off the back and sides.. I don't have a rotor. If I need to turn it, I have to go out and "armstrong" the mast...So I note the skip trends at the time, and turn it that way. Usually east in the early day. Often later, as the skip drifts west, I'll end up swinging it around in the evening. Most lately is E skip...Here at this qth, the HF antennas have gain also, but they are fairly unusable due to the trashing of the receiver. On the 706, the yagi really cleans it up. This is probably worth more here, than the transmit gain. My usual parallel dipole setup for the low bands is resonant on 6m pretty close. I don't even need a tuner , if I remember right...I'm sure it's got some pretty good gain in some directions. But the beam still smokes it overall. I actually don't get on there all that much, as I usually don't notice the band openings, and have been busy also...But all the people I've worked so far gave me really good reports. I did do a f/b test with it , right after I built it, and it seemed to jive with the model almost exactly. Or as far as I could tell with my limited, means of measurement...The beam is an exact copy of the NBS yagi in elnec/eznec. MK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Handy Shortwave Chart | Info | |||
Handy Shortwave Chart | Info | |||
Handy Shortwave Chart | Info | |||
Handy Shortwave Chart | Info | |||
Handy Shortwave Chart | Info |