Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Charlie AD5TH:
You have performed a great service by presenting the results of K5HGR's engineering and your work. Its educational value is almost beyond calculation. In this part of the world one would need to have a licensed professional engineer (PE) sign off on such a structure. Clearly, down your way one has freedom to innovate without concern for issues that we are required to consider. My goodness. I recently completed a task of a tall tower in a populated area where I had to have design work from the factory's PE, have that work reviewed by a local PE, get permission from the local municipality, have the airport sign off on the height, take soil samples so that a safe foundation could be designed, watch the fabrication of the foundation to make sure that it was done right, and on and on... Course, we do get serious wind up here and it just would not do to kill someone with a tower collapse. You sure are fortunate not to have all of the things we have to put up with and not even have to worry about wind. Do keep us posted. The whole story has yet to be revealed. 73 Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed wrote:
As far as ANY tower can be blown down.... not really true for a properly engineered and maintained structure. I saw on The National Geographic Channel yesterday where all towers left standing will be blown down when our sun explodes about five billion years from now. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charlie,
It's very obvious a lot of hard work went into that project, this makes it even harder to face criticism, but don't lose sight of the fact that it's constructive (even though it's deteriorating rapidly.) There really are numerous problems with your installation, and some will inevitably lead to catastrophic failure and potential loss of life. Be careful around that thing until you can fix it up. In the least, install dedicated anchor points set in a sizeable concrete base, shorten your top mast and get a thrust bearing up there. Put at least 1/3 of your rotatable mast below the bearing. This is by no means a complete list, but I think the majority of readers will agree it's a good place to start. Rob |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well considering he is the former AB7SL it wouldnt surprise me this is
his creation. If you do a net search on good ole charlie you will find lots of things. Including his imitating a couple of amateurs on the newsgroups to promote his spamming of the Newsgroups with the Antenna sales. I understand that 2 of them were really unhappy about that and were getting lawyers and soon after that charles disappeared from the net as AB7SL and now he has reappeared. Charles charles, when you going to learn. -- Rick Everett, Washington Remove THREAD to reply. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm Well considering he is the former AB7SL it wouldnt surprise me this
is his creation. If you do a net search on good ole charlie you will find lots of things. Keep your head down. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jun 2005 08:02:47 -0700, "Rick Scott"
wrote: Hmm Well considering he is the former AB7SL it wouldnt surprise me this is his creation. If you do a net search on good ole charlie you will find lots of things. Keep your head down. ohhhh, that guy. he used to promote w9inn's antennas, much to w9inn's irritation... bob k5qwg |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ohhhh, that guy. he used to promote w9inn's antennas, much to w9inn's
irritation... bob k5qwg Among other things yes. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.radio.amateur.dx Rick Scott wrote:
Hmm Well considering he is the former AB7SL *That* explains a lot. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Was schlechten Geschmack so berauschend macht, ist die aristokratische Wonne der Verärgerung. -- Charles Baudelaire |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mac,
We had certain constraints to work around such as available guy anchors vs. distance of tower from shack since it is a VHF installation I needed to be as close to the shack as possible for transmission line loss considerations even with 9914. Even though we have over 40 acres the tower needed to be close as hardline was not an option. I am in the country here so there is little building regulation to adhere to or approvals of construction projects. We could and still might add concreted guy anchors although they would give more interference for the mower and foot traffic in the back and front yards and that was a concern of the xyl. The tower has a very low wind load on it with those 2 small lightweight VHF antennas. I know it is very common for hams to overload their "properly engineered and maintained " towers. As far as mating 2 different brands of towers I was on a budget and had access to 45ft of what has been called "Sears" brand and 40 ft of 25g. We altered our design from an 85ft erection down to 75ft as a safety precaution during and after the installation. Yes trees do sway but as the photos show they don't sway where the guys are attached. Our insurance man has added the structure to our list of covered items in our policy so evidently it was OK for coverage. I suppose that no matter how we installed this tower and I so naively posted a photo link there are some that will berate it. TY for your civility however..seriously it was quite refreshing..... -- Charlie Ham Radio - AD5TH www.ad5th.com Deep South 2 Meter SSB Net www.deepsouthnet.net "J. Mc Laughlin" wrote in message ... Dear Charlie AD5TH: You have performed a great service by presenting the results of K5HGR's engineering and your work. Its educational value is almost beyond calculation. In this part of the world one would need to have a licensed professional engineer (PE) sign off on such a structure. Clearly, down your way one has freedom to innovate without concern for issues that we are required to consider. My goodness. I recently completed a task of a tall tower in a populated area where I had to have design work from the factory's PE, have that work reviewed by a local PE, get permission from the local municipality, have the airport sign off on the height, take soil samples so that a safe foundation could be designed, watch the fabrication of the foundation to make sure that it was done right, and on and on... Course, we do get serious wind up here and it just would not do to kill someone with a tower collapse. You sure are fortunate not to have all of the things we have to put up with and not even have to worry about wind. Do keep us posted. The whole story has yet to be revealed. 73 Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good point...guess I'll have enough time then for VUCC!!!
-- Charlie Ham Radio - AD5TH www.ad5th.com Deep South 2 Meter SSB Net www.deepsouthnet.net "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Ed wrote: As far as ANY tower can be blown down.... not really true for a properly engineered and maintained structure. I saw on The National Geographic Channel yesterday where all towers left standing will be blown down when our sun explodes about five billion years from now. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tower Resonance Breaker? | Antenna | |||
Single ground | Antenna | |||
Is lighting nuts? | Antenna | |||
PRESS RELEASE: HCDX Online Log 1.0 released | Shortwave | |||
FS: U.S. Tower TX489 MDPL 89' Telescopic tower | Equipment |