Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mikey" wrote in message ...
Troy, for 10/15 meters, it's tough to beat a directed array (i.e., a beam). To that end, you'll get the most bang for your buck from a quad. Period. If you're looking at a G5RV, look instead at a Skelton Cone. With your current transmitter/tuner combo, it will go from 10 through 80 meters, and in fact, naturally resonates somewhere in the 10/12 meter area. I haven't run any models on it myself, but others have told me that it actually shows gain on 40 and 75/80 meters. I don't have any e-files on it, but I can snaily a drawing to you if you can't find any other info on it. Of course, these are just my own opinions, and are based solely on emperical performance observations. Your mileage may vary... 73, Mike KI6PR El Rancho R.F., CA "Troy - VK2HXY" wrote Hi there ladies and gents. I have a question that has most likely come up here before, and I do apologise if this is visiting old ground. I am a novice limited license holder in Australia and pretty soon I will have access to the 10-15 and 80M bands. I would like to know what you consider as being the best all round antenna for my purpose? I have plenty of room to mount an 80M dipole antenna, although height is a problem. I can go up no more than about 50 feet. I also have a mast and rotator, so a triband yagi is also on the cards. Just looking for decent ideas here guy's. I know the question is fairly open ended, but I would like to consider all my options from those who have all the best knowledge of what works and what doesn't. To wire or not to wire? To beam or not to beam? To G5RV?????? I am running a TS-850, an MFJ 989C Tuner running 100W out of the box. Thanks very much for your time and I really appreciate your response to my questions. Warmest regards 73 de VK2HXY Troy Troy, Before you do anything check what directions will provide the most enjoyment. From where you in front and beyond Perth that would gain your attention? Same goes for the Northern territories or the interior. You could also take bands above 20 out of consideration as the 11 year cycle now provides diminishing returns. So in your particular case there is more to an antenna selection than say in Europe and the U.S. A wet noodle will only give you something to chew on and not the customary ragchew. Cheers Art |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:34:55 -0800, "Mikey" wrote:
If you're looking at a G5RV, look instead at a Skelton Cone. With your current transmitter/tuner combo, it will go from 10 through 80 meters, and in fact, naturally resonates somewhere in the 10/12 meter area. I haven't run any models on it myself, but others have told me that it actually shows gain on 40 and 75/80 meters. I don't have any e-files on it, but I can snaily a drawing to you if you can't find any other info on it. Of course, these are just my own opinions, and are based solely on emperical performance observations. Your mileage may vary... Hi Mike, Skeleton Cone???? I presume you mean Discone. Either way, and as a vertical, this would not work very well to enjoy that "paper gain." If it works at 80M (which would mean it is roughly 50 feet tall covering 8000 sq feet - about one large, or two small residential lots) would suggest its best radiation advantage for 10M is straight up. Even though Discones (or other broadband antennas) have wide matching characterisitics, their actual radiation performance varies considerable over that same span of frequency. If you expect to find significant gain, you need the discone to be significantly larger, with a significantly wide cone skirt. In other words, something on the order of an HF Horn design. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy, Toy
Best all around antenna is a center fed doublet fed with balanced TL such as transmitting twin lead, ladder line, or open wire line. Make sure that the sending end of this TL "sees" balanced source. Mine is 130 ft long fed with 300-Ohm transmitting twin lead. I use it on all bands 80 thru 10. I have also used it on 6M with my tuner straining to get a match. On 40 the theoretical gain over a dipole is said to be 1.8 dB. If you can only have one antenna, this is your best bet. 73 es gud luck, Jack K9CUN |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JDer8745 wrote:
Best all around antenna is a center fed doublet fed with balanced TL such as transmitting twin lead, ladder line, or open wire line. He asked for the best all *round* antenna. Your antenna is not round at all. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks heaps to all who have replied so far. It really is nice to see so
many people willing to share the knowledge with those less in the know. Warmest regards to all, and if anyone want's to make more recommendations, feel free. 73 de VK2HXY Troy Sydney Australia "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... JDer8745 wrote: Best all around antenna is a center fed doublet fed with balanced TL such as transmitting twin lead, ladder line, or open wire line. He asked for the best all *round* antenna. Your antenna is not round at all. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tarmo, Or, you could look at it in the opposite way. The tuner would replace the beam, tower, and rotor at a net savings of ~probably~ the price of the tuner. I wonder why people are so 'afraid' of tuners? 'Doc |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "'Doc" wrote in message ... Tarmo, Or, you could look at it in the opposite way. The tuner would replace the beam, tower, and rotor at a net savings of ~probably~ the price of the tuner. I wonder why people are so 'afraid' of tuners? 'Doc OK, how about this: I was just listening to an EA8 on 20 meters. He was S9 on the tribander, and S4 on the 75 meter antenna. Also, why have a no tune transmitter when you have to retune the antenna tuner when you change frequency. Tam/WB2TT |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tarmo, Wrote in part; Also, why have a no tune transmitter when you have to retune the antenna tuner when you change frequency. Well, lets see. 1. No tower, or room for a beam antenna. 2. Hand, wrist, and arm not broken, sprained, strained, or lazy. 3. The 'no tune' transmitter wasn't ~my~ idea. I don't mind tuning. 4. Simplifies antenna system. 5. Even if I think antennas are beautiful, neighbors don't. 6. Don't really care if 'they' hear me S-9 or S-4, as long as they hear me. Same for hearing 'them'. 7. Had a tribander. The loop did as well and in some instances better. (Do have to admit the tribander wasn't up very high.) 8. Don't have to worry about a rotor and everything associated with one. 9. And... we're talking about a "best" 'all around antenna' which implies not having several. No ~one~ antenna does everything well, there are always compromises in performance vs. simplicity. Some would rather use a tuner than have a number of antennas, some won't. I really don't think it'll make much difference either way... 'Doc |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JDer8745" wrote in message
... Howdy, Toy Best all around antenna is a center fed doublet fed with balanced TL such as transmitting twin lead, ladder line, or open wire line. Dont forget a balanced feedline radiates along the line. You may have to deal with this somehow with the Australian Communications Authority's new radiation guidelines. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
Dont forget a balanced feedline radiates along the line. If the currents are balanced, most of the photons are re-absorbed by the free electrons. OTOH, if the currents inside a coax feedline are not balanced, an unbalanced feedline radiates along the line. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Ten-tec vee beam | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |