Richard Clark wrote:

: The British Empire must, as one would expect, have an Emperor, and
: particularly a British Emperor. If we scan the list of Royals over
: time, certainly Britain had an Emperor (Carausius) during the Roman


i think ( 80% sure-ish) you'll find that
ONE of the lesser known titles of
HRH QE II is EMPEROR

"Fred W4JLE" wrote:

: We, or more correctly our forefathers, were patriots as far as we were
: concerned, revolutionists, ingrates, and other labels as perceived by the
: British oppressors.

exactly my point.

some of the countries of TODAY who seem to POLICE THE WORLD
were themselves CREATED as a result of acts of TERRORISM.

Some of these countries ACTUALLY CELEBRATE the results of
this TERRORISM on some day during the year.

A topic usually IGNORED.

"ZZZZPK "

wrote in message ...
Richard Clark wrote:

: The British Empire must, as one would expect, have an Emperor, and
: particularly a British Emperor. If we scan the list of Royals over
: time, certainly Britain had an Emperor (Carausius) during the Roman


i think ( 80% sure-ish) you'll find that
ONE of the lesser known titles of
HRH QE II is EMPEROR

Not since 1947.

--
73

Gerry G0RTN
Vanity Page at http://www.gerrylynch.co.uk

Another one is "The Great Parasite Of Windsor"

"ZZZZPK "

wrote in message ...
Richard Clark wrote:

: The British Empire must, as one would expect, have an Emperor, and
: particularly a British Emperor. If we scan the list of Royals over
: time, certainly Britain had an Emperor (Carausius) during the Roman


i think ( 80% sure-ish) you'll find that
ONE of the lesser known titles of
HRH QE II is EMPEROR

"Gerard Lynch" wrote:


: Not since 1947.

i wasnt referring to ''over here''

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:40:02 +0100, Walt Davidson
wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:56:44 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

For a police state to exist, the first step is
to disarm the citizens.

The citizens in this country have never been armed, and in fact even
hand-guns for sport use were recently outlawed.

73 de G3NYY

OK. For a police state to exist, the second step is saturation
video surveillance of the downtown area of your capital.

The third step is to destroy the public library system through
non-judicially-supervised, on-demand, secret surveillance.

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:37:51 GMT, "Tom Donaly"
wrote:

Fred W4JLE wrote:
Actually $1.76 as of today, but used to be worth $2.40.
Any country too politically correct to call a terrorist a terrorist is not
long for the world.


Tis a real shame the spawn of a great people that endured so much with the
"stiff upper lip" are a bunch of wimps!

"Polymath" wrote in message
...


Pound, Money = sort of like a dollar, but twice as valuable and more

robust.




Anyone who underestimates the toughness, tenacity, and resilience of the

... for which, read -- dogged intransigence in defense of
imperialism.

British people is a fool. The Irish Republican Army waged a terrorist
campaign against London for years

... until?

without having any effect
whatsoever on British resolve. While I'm no fan of the British,
I'd like to see some of our whining, sweat-drenched, paranoid
patriots make a stab at doing even half as well.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:15:45 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:31:59 -0500, (Richard
Harrison) wrote:

The white house is dense. The U.S. has been spending 8 billion a year
just to improve Iraqi infrastructure so foreigners might invest in a
place with no law and order. The infrastructure is in desparate need of
repair from war, sabotage, crime, and neglect.

Hi Richard,

As acknowledge by the white house, this Trillion dollar sink hole is
putting money down the toilet by buying bullets to protect against
suicide bombers (hasn't worked - ever - this has been going on since
Nobel invented dynamite).

Simple resolution with that same Trillion dollars that WOULD solve
things would be to set up shop next door to the guys strapping sticks
of TNT to the Iraqi's vests. Instead, offer to strap packs of $100
for every stick of dynamite they might have lined up for.

Let's say that they would come out looking like a Chia Pet with
$50,000 glommed onto them.

We could do this with every man, woman, and child in all of Iraq.

What makes you think we'll figure this out for Iraq when we
can't dope out that a couple thousand worth of meaningful pre-natal
care would save thousands in prisoner maintenance down the road at
home.



It won't happen, of course, because there is no will to win the war -
only to fight one. Except for those who have something better to do
with their lives (indirect quote of the draft dodger who shunned
military service to run this corporate franchise called the Pentagon).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:01:20 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote:



Clearly there is absolutely no will to win. There is every will to
balance this war on the back of men in uniform though and to rob the
treasury to pay contractors 5 to 10 times as much to do the same work
of a qualified grunt, who has to train these clowns and then take an
RPG while watching their backs.

A lot of the "security contractor" thing is a charade anyway.
Before the stop-loss insanity, many of the qualified smart grunts and
their officers bailed out of the military and formed, or went to work
for, the "contractors" for the larger salaries. Then we have the gall
to express horror when these "civilians" are targeted. They've only
changed uniforms.




The draft dodgers and goldbricks that inhabit the administration never
learned the lessons of Vietnam - they had more important things to do
with their life when other men in uniform were preserving freedom and
Democracy and standing against the Communist menace.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 at 22:55:41, wrote:

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:37:51 GMT, "Tom Donaly"
wrote:

Anyone who underestimates the toughness, tenacity, and resilience of the
British people is a fool. The Irish Republican Army waged a terrorist
campaign against London for years

... until?


You Americans got a taste of terrorism in your own back yard and lost
interest in funding Irish Republican terrorists.

It's a shame it took so long.