LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 14th 03, 08:07 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is what I am worried about. Stainless has about 15% the
conductivity of copper but I have seen outrageously expensive stainless
QFH antennas on some big outrageously expensive yachts that work great.


Long term, they might do better than copper, which wouldn't last as long.


.................................................. ..............

An antenna has both radiation and loss resistance.

Suppose a VHF copper dipole is 99% efficient.

If it is replaced with stainless steel which has 10 times the resistance
loss then the efficiency will fall to 90%.

Nobody will be able to detect any difference except that in 5 years time in
a marine environment the stainless steel dipole will still be working.

An understanding of ohms law is useful.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? totojepast Antenna 16 September 21st 03 07:45 PM
Helix Antennas & Delta Match Chris I Townsend Antenna 0 September 2nd 03 09:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017