Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is what I am worried about. Stainless has about 15% the
conductivity of copper but I have seen outrageously expensive stainless QFH antennas on some big outrageously expensive yachts that work great. Long term, they might do better than copper, which wouldn't last as long. .................................................. .............. An antenna has both radiation and loss resistance. Suppose a VHF copper dipole is 99% efficient. If it is replaced with stainless steel which has 10 times the resistance loss then the efficiency will fall to 90%. Nobody will be able to detect any difference except that in 5 years time in a marine environment the stainless steel dipole will still be working. An understanding of ohms law is useful. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? | Antenna | |||
Helix Antennas & Delta Match | Antenna |