Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The performance of a coaxial choke inserted at the antenna end of the
feedline cannot be properly studied without knowledge of the feedline's length in wavelengths and how the feedline is terminated at the transmitter end. No two systems are the same. Choke performance depends on the condition of the system before the choke is inserted. The choking effect depends on the impedance seen by the choke looking into the outer conductor of the coaxial feedline. The input impedance of the coaxial outer conductor depends on Zo, 400 to 550 ohms, of the single-wire line, its length in wavelengths, and on the very uncertain resistance of the ground connection at the transmitter end. If the ground connection at the transmitter end is very low and the line is an odd number of 1/4-wavelengths there will be a very high impedance at the antenna end and longitudinal current will negligible. Insertion of the choke will have no effect. If the line is a whole number of 1/2-wavelengths, with a low resistance ground the input impedance of the coaxial outer conductor will also be very low and longitudinal current in the line will be at a maximum. Insertion of the choke will be very effective. With the usual random line length and on different bands, choke performance will always be completely random and unpredictable. Which explains the different opinions and arguments about whether a choke is necessary or not. Program SELFRES3 models choke behaviour. ---- .................................................. .......... Regards from Reg, G4FGQ For Free Radio Design Software go to http://www.btinternet.com/~g4fgq.regp .................................................. .......... |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:17:23 -0500, Tom Ring
wrote: Walter Maxwell wrote: snip Walt, W2DU Thank you for that, Walter. This one gets printed and goes in the binder. tom K0TAR I'm pleased that you find my data useful, Tom, Walt |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
If the line is a whole number of 1/2-wavelengths, with a low resistance ground the input impedance of the coaxial outer conductor will also be very low and longitudinal current in the line will be at a maximum. Insertion of the choke will be very effective. To complicate things a little more, the common-mode current may consist of standing waves. If the choke is installed at a current minimum point, it may have little effect. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Reg Edwards wrote: If the line is a whole number of 1/2-wavelengths, with a low resistance ground the input impedance of the coaxial outer conductor will also be very low and longitudinal current in the line will be at a maximum. Insertion of the choke will be very effective. To complicate things a little more, the common-mode current may consist of standing waves. If the choke is installed at a current minimum point, it may have little effect. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ==================================== Dear Cec, It doesn't complicate things. It merely repeats what I have already said. When the line is an odd number of 1/4-waves long and there is an (albeit indeterminate) ground at the transmitter end, then there will be a high impedance at the choke (DUE TO STANDING WAVES) and the choke will then be wasting its time. If you havn't, moons ago, already downloaded the program then do so and read the program notes. There are so many unknowns in it the results are only approximate but nevertheless sufficiently accurate for the intended purpose - which is just to demonstrate choke behaviour. The only accurate result is the calculated-from-first-principles self-capacitance of the coil on which the impedance/frequency response depends. I had checked calculations, years back, by winding many coils of various sizes and shapes, (one 7 feet long), with various numbers of turns and measuring the coils' self-resonant frequency over the HF band using hand-held instruments with coils suspended in free space from strings. I always knew the results would be useful at some time or other, never even dreaming about choke baluns. Did I ever tell you that for several years I was Head of a Measurements Standards Laboratory which I personally set up from scratch and which was in the 2nd echelon from the British National Physical Laboratory. The NPL. There were certain electrical parameters for which the laboratory was capable of making measurements more accurate than the NPL but for obvious political reasons it was not possible for the laboratory to claim such performance on calibration certificates. Some time after I had left the position on promotion, the wicked Mrs Thatcher had the laboratory dismantled and sold it off in bits because it did not produce any immediate, short-term profits. She was a chemist who went into politics. Often I still wonder what happened to the oven-enclosed battery of 12 standard Western cells. One day, if I can force myself to find the time, I may write my memoirs. I could tell you some amusing stories. ---- Yours, Reg, G4FGQ |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
When the line is an odd number of 1/4-waves long and there is an (albeit indeterminate) ground at the transmitter end, then there will be a high impedance at the choke (DUE TO STANDING WAVES) and the choke will then be wasting its time. And what I am saying is that exactly the same thing can happen NO MATTER WHAT THE LENGTH OF THE FEEDLINE if the choke is located at a current minimum point. I'm not arguing with you - just expanding upon what you said. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Speaking of useful data, what is the status of reflections III Sir?
"Walter Maxwell" wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:17:23 -0500, Tom Ring I'm pleased that you find my data useful, Tom, Walt |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:01:06 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: One day, if I can force myself to find the time, I may write my memoirs. I could tell you some amusing stories. ---- Yours, Reg, G4FGQ Please force yourself, Reg, we'd all like to hear those stories. And they should be published for all to read. Walt |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:49:21 -0400, "Fred W4JLE"
wrote: Speaking of useful data, what is the status of reflections III Sir? "Walter Maxwell" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:17:23 -0500, Tom Ring I'm pleased that you find my data useful, Tom, Walt Hi Fred, Reflections 3 is at the publisher. I don't know the current status, but thanks for asking. I'll keep the rraa up to date at it progresses. It'll also be announced on my web page at w2du.com. Walt |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Choke Balun Impedance Recommendations? | Antenna | |||
NEW - Choke Balun Program | Antenna | |||
Antenna Questions | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
How to test a balun? | Antenna |