Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Craig wrote:
intends etching the antenna onto a printed circuit board and in a subsequent E-mail he asked whether the width of the foils should be the same as for regular rod elements. Warning -- the following is reasoned guesswork before my second cup of coffee... Since it is not really the width of the rod elements that is important, but rather the surface area (derived from the circumference 2*pi*r), I would think that the width of the foils on the pc board should correspond to the circumference of the rod elements, and should be calculated as Diameter*pi |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read about PCB strip antennas years back. From what I recall (subject to
correction of course) the bandwidth of the device is a function of strip width (to a limit of course.) Also, if the strip is too narrow, the antenna impedance will be skewed. I suppose that's due to the velocity factor of the etched conductor. It's been quite a while since I've read up on any of this so my menory of it might be severly distorted and if so, please accept my apologies. An hour of surfing and searching should yield more than enough info. Cheers, Pat |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder if the velocity factor, i.e. length, in the dipole would be
affected by the dielectric constant of the PCB? I know that in microstrip transmission lines the Vf is inversely proportional to the square root of the dielectric. This would be an antenna with two different dielectrics; one, air: second PCB. An alternative to etching the antenna, leaving copper for the antenna, would be to etch the antenna away leaving the remainder of the copper and tuning it as a 'Slot' antenna. This might have promise! Deacon Dave, W1MCE + + + Craig wrote: A passing acquaintance of my wife's has E-mailed me for assistance with calculating the element lengths for a UHF dipole he wishes to build. I gave him the required information, however, he apparently intends etching the antenna onto a printed circuit board and in a subsequent E-mail he asked whether the width of the foils should be the same as for regular rod elements. In any event, in my very limited experience, I've never heard of etching antennas onto a circuit board. Is this really possible, and if so, can I direct him to a suitable web site with more info. Craig |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Shrader" wrote in message ... I wonder if the velocity factor, i.e. length, in the dipole would be affected by the dielectric constant of the PCB? Absolutely. Also the loss factor. I know that in microstrip transmission lines the Vf is inversely proportional to the square root of the dielectric. This would be an antenna with two different dielectrics; one, air: second PCB. Yes ![]() An alternative to etching the antenna, leaving copper for the antenna, would be to etch the antenna away leaving the remainder of the copper and tuning it as a 'Slot' antenna. This might have promise! Monopole, Yagi, LPDA and Patch are all commonly done on pcb material. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Impedance of a printed circuit board antenna? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |