Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dennis Kaylor wrote: what i dont understand is if you guys dont like the deed restrictions you are legally free not to sign the deed and move to another area why should the federal government step in and tell some city or housing community that the CONTRACT you knowingly and willing signed is worthless you guys and your wives all want the nice classy neighborhoods and gated communities with the fine trimmed lawns and lexus in every driveway but you think your special cause you want to have an outside antenna well how would you feel if your next door neighbor paintes his house the most aful shade of slime yellow you ever saw? you would be down to the community meeting griping your heads off so either live with the contract your signed or move Dear HOA's COPS, NO, it's not time to move. It's time to get sneaky and stealthy with your antennas, find me if you can. But there isn't a darn thing you can do about it as long as it's not in the public's eye. By the way, my Dish Networks dish is going up. Thank you FCC for making them LEGAL. But is was going up regardless, just like the others have in this housing plan with such antenna restrictions. HOA's that restricted antennas made cable the only way your could receive any tv stations. That was illegal from the start. As I have said, I am moving into such a housing plan. "WE" don't own a lexus or similar vehicle and I haven't seen one in the plan. The majority of people there seem to be down to earth everyday nice people, until you get to the HOA Cops, which every housing plan with HOA restrictions of any kind has. Normal people who reside in a nice house isn't going to paint their house some weird color, park junk vehicles, let their grass turn to weed or put up gigantic towers and antennas, etc.. By the way, I haven't signed any such agreement when I bought the house. I do know that such HOA "BS" does exist just to please the people residing there that doesn't trust their neighbors. They are the ones that should move. "TRUST" is the word. I did some checking and the first house sold in the plan was to a nice family (mechanic) with two children. He/they have an immaculate looking yard and house. He is a scanner enthusiast and has his antennas located in his attic, aside from his dish which is located on the back of roof. Where there's a will there is a way. "God Bless America" for the freedoms we still have. Have a positive day. |
#72
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... What Ed is saying is: If you enjoy a hobby that requires an antenna or anything outside your home forget it, buckle down to raising fish and sell the radio hobby stuff. That will be the day I turn my home over the HOA Cops, agreement or not. If homeowners keep buckling down to these people next thing you will be paying their mortgage and taxes. Go Bless America for the freedoms our proud veterans fought for. A very good example of the viewpoint of a rogue who tries to cloak her improprieties in the blood of patriots and the silk of religion. The fundamental civility of our society is based on our ability to enter into contracts. We promise something and the other party promises something. A contract is simply a permanent record of the defined promises. You are expected to uphold your promises. What I am saying is quite simple; if you don't like the terms of a contract, then don't enter into it. Ed WB6WSN |
#73
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message hlink.net... "Ed Price" wrote: Read the rest of the ruling. It defines that the antenna may be located only in your private area (patio, balcony), not in the public or mutually owned areas (roof, outside wall). This makes it none too helpful for apartment and condo dwellers. Accept it; there are some hobbies that are incompatible with high-density dwellings. How does that chance anything I said, Ed? I said nothing about apartment and condo dwellers, and nothing about antenna location. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ It doesn't change anything you said. I posted my comments to amplify and clarify your (and earlier poster's) comments, not as a refutation. Try not to view everything as a challenge. Ed WB6WSN |
#74
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Normal people who reside in a nice house isn't going to paint their
house some weird color, park junk vehicles, let their grass turn to weed or put up gigantic towers and antennas, etc.. Hams are not normal people, they want gigantic towers and antennas. |
#75
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is right .... put up the bigest antenna as high as you can get it.
If it stays up more than 6 months then it was not big or high enough! Willee "Ralph Mowery" wrote in message ... Normal people who reside in a nice house isn't going to paint their house some weird color, park junk vehicles, let their grass turn to weed or put up gigantic towers and antennas, etc.. Hams are not normal people, they want gigantic towers and antennas. |
#76
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ralph Mowery wrote: Normal people who reside in a nice house isn't going to paint their house some weird color, park junk vehicles, let their grass turn to weed or put up gigantic towers and antennas, etc.. Hams are not normal people, they want gigantic towers and antennas. Ralph, just what is your ham call??? |
#77
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dennis Kaylor" wrote:
what i dont understand is if you guys dont like the deed restrictions you are legally free not to sign the deed and move to another area why should the federal government step in and tell some city or housing community that the CONTRACT you knowingly and willing signed is worthless (snip) Dennis, either you don't live in a town like this or CC&Rs simply haven't reached your community yet. The major industry in this town is tourism. Because of that, any house built within the last twenty years has a CC&R antenna restriction. Even worse, real estate agencies, hoping to cash in on the tourist trade, have purchased most of the older properties, adding CC&Rs antenna restrictions to those. At this point, unless one is willing to move twenty to thirty miles outside the area, CC&Rs antenna restrictions have become an almost inescapable fact of life. Perhaps you consider that acceptable. However, I don't happen to think people should have to move miles away from work, schools, or shopping, just to have an antenna. And, indeed, many people are not going to do so - which means they will simply have to give up radio as a hobby or recreation instead. you guys and your wives all want the nice classy neighborhoods and gated communities with the fine trimmed lawns and lexus in every driveway but you think your special cause you want to have an outside antenna (snip) Obviously CC&R antenna restrictions haven't reached your community yet. We're not just talking about gated communities or luxury properties. In this area, these restrictions can be found on even the cheapest properties. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#78
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Price" wrote:
It doesn't change anything you said. I posted my comments to amplify and clarify your (and earlier poster's) comments, not as a refutation. Try not to view everything as a challenge. Perhaps I did respond defensively, but your "read the rest of the ruling" comment suggested there was something in the rest of the ruling which should have my attention (a conflict with what I wrote, perhaps). But, as stated, I saw no conflict (or anything else that would specifically modify what I wrote). Regardless, no big deal - a simple misunderstanding. It happens. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#79
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ralph Mowery wrote: Normal people who reside in a nice house isn't going to paint their house some weird color, park junk vehicles, let their grass turn to weed or put up gigantic towers and antennas, etc.. Hams are not normal people, they want gigantic towers and antennas. Ralph, just what is your ham call??? KU4PT and I have been a ham for over 30 years. I don't have a gigantic tower beacuse I am on a small lot and also don't have the money to put up one like I would like to have. I do have a 40 foot tower and also a shorter ,maybe about 12 ot 15 feet, with my OSCAR antennas on them. I just installed two more 20 feet towers with a 10 foot pipe on them about 140 feet apart to hold up an 80 meter dipole. No trees so to speak of in the yard. |
#80
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anytime I hear that statement I just right of the person saying it as an
idiot. I haven't been wrong on that one yet. "WilleeCue" wrote in message .. . The great American spoof is "home ownership". If you ever think you really "own" your home just stop paying money for it and see what happens! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|