Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It appears our remodel in our single-family home will have a number of
fluorescent light fixtures. Does anyone out there have these in your home and experience any noise that bothers your 160-10 m operation? Should a new installation and new bulbs produce very little noise? I would like to hear any experiences, including any work-arounds. Regards, Ted, K6KIM |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Brown" wrote in message om... It appears our remodel in our single-family home will have a number of fluorescent light fixtures. Does anyone out there have these in your home and experience any noise that bothers your 160-10 m operation? Should a new installation and new bulbs produce very little noise? I would like to hear any experiences, including any work-arounds. Regards, Ted, K6KIM I guess it may depend to some extent on the quality and type of fixtures/bulbs that you install. My shack is in a finished "walk-out" basement (the house is dug into the slope at the top of the hill, such that from the front it appears to be a 1-story structure, but from the back side, it's 2-story). The entire basement area, ham shack, electronics lab, office, family room, woodshop, etc. is VERY well illuminated by an array of fixtures set in the grid of a suspended ceiling. Area is about 2000 sq. ft. and there are 14 4 ft., 4-tube fixtures. I have checked and I can't see a noticable change in RX noise in the HF bands between all lights off and all lights on. If you get a tube that's starting to go, or a bad ballast, that could cause a dramatic change ... something that bodes in favor of replacing bad tubes. (Of course, my antennas are outside, away from the lighting, and the house is covered with aluminum siding for low maintenance, which may help to contain any noise from the lighting ... YMMV, depending on such shielding, antenna placement relative to the lighting, etc.) 73, Carl - wk3c |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:43:17 GMT, "Carl R. Stevenson"
wrote: I guess it may depend to some extent on the quality and type of fixtures/bulbs that you install. Doesn't really matter much. Most noise optimized tubes are really audio noise issues. My shack is in a finished "walk-out" basement (the house is dug into the slope at the top of the hill, such that from the front it appears to be a 1-story structure, but from the back side, it's 2-story). The entire basement area, ham shack, electronics lab, office, family room, woodshop, etc. is VERY well illuminated by an array of fixtures set in the grid of a suspended ceiling. Area is about 2000 sq. ft. and there are 14 4 ft., 4-tube fixtures. I have checked and I can't see a noticable change in RX noise in the HF bands between all lights off and all lights on. If you get a tube that's starting to go, or a bad ballast, that could cause a dramatic change ... something that bodes in favor of replacing bad tubes. (Of course, my antennas are outside, away from the lighting, and the house is covered with aluminum siding for low maintenance, which may help to contain any noise from the lighting ... YMMV, depending on such shielding, antenna placement relative to the lighting, etc.) 73, Carl - wk3c Hi All, My situation is very similar to Carl's, and my experience is very much like his as well. I went a little further to provoke problems to confirm all sources of noise within my home. The first was to establish a noise baseline (done at various times of day and night and time of year, across the many bands) by using my rig on battery power (it is actually always battery powered, but employs a floating charger) with the charger and all accessories disconnected and ground removed (no ground loops). I also throw the main breaker. There are any number of hidden power loads that you cannot disable or otherwise isolate. One of the most egregious examples is the doorbell transformer that in older homes can turn into an S9 noise generator that will plague many "experts." That was Step One. There is not much point in going to Step Two if you cannot isolate sources. Many succeed however, through weeks of hair pulling and a magical connection (or break) that could also kill them. Step Two is to throw the breaker back on. If this seems a huge chore of having you go through the house resetting clocks, let me console you with the evidence that that end of the gene pool has been thinned out considerably by the twice annual event of daylight savings and the invention of the digital clock. Survivors of that Darwinian task can now take another noise reading (again observing the list of times and frequencies already mentioned). Step Three (this is a progression back toward your conventional shack design) is to start adding loads to the house circuit. Again, take readings (you need not note times as you are now introducing correlated noise). Remove power from all such loads. Step Four is to add back your conventional ground (that is, the ground through which power, not RF arrives). This introduces the possibility of a ground loop. Repeat Step Three. Step Five is to add back your conventional accessories. This too introduces the possibility of a ground loop. Repeat Step Four (which recursively repeats Step Three, of course). All told, this should result in a grid of readings with several dozen (maybe 100) data points. This will take far less time than trying to solve a noise problem that persists for more than a day (and possibly on the WRONG day). Any one of these tests could result in the appearance of noise. Sometimes this is correlated to the last addition of a load, but as tantalizing as that is, it too refuses cure (and you cannot live without that load). Such problems then need to be isolated as to being over the air, or through conduction. Over the air problems are often fixed by Carl's observation of having the antenna away from the house. More telling is the addition of a choke BalUn at all feed points (even those remote from the house, this is especially true for long wavelengths). Problems of conduction are in fact ground loop based. You are sharing the same circuit as the noisy load. I have fluorescents above my station, and dimmers on every incandescent bulb in my house and yet I suffer very little noise arriving by conduction (and find it perturbs over the air by 3 or 4 dB above baseline before I go turn off that light I rarely do that because atmospherics and remote noise often overwhelm this local contribution). A simple way to confirm this noise path is to break it by powering your equipment off another circuit (circuit meaning the wire path to a separate breaker at the distribution panel). This can make 10-60 dB difference for dimmers alone (or the other killer, the fish tank heater). Simply employ a sufficiently long extension cord so that you do not change your shack configuration (which would also force another baseline evaluation). The single next greatest contributor of noise is through peripheral, accessory connections. The lighted Daiwa SWR meter has a lump you plug into the wall. Both the lump and the connection are potential problems if you disregard them and one or the other turns out to be the problem. It is easy to disregard such an inconsequential item, so to are computers with modems the third most common source of ground loop. If you wish to preserve those accessories, buffer your power through an isolation transformer with a faraday shield connection. Connecting the shield is also not obvious (there are reasons to connect it to the sink, there are reasons to connect it to the source - but never both). My battery charger is so buffered. Well, these are the heavy hitters of noise. There are more, but their application becomes a matter of simple logic and practice when you have a basis. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a four foot two bulb flourecent in my shack. I have a random wire
antenna running within 3 feet of it. No problem at all. "John Brown" wrote in message om... It appears our remodel in our single-family home will have a number of fluorescent light fixtures. Does anyone out there have these in your home and experience any noise that bothers your 160-10 m operation? Should a new installation and new bulbs produce very little noise? I would like to hear any experiences, including any work-arounds. Regards, Ted, K6KIM |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a four foot two bulb flourecent in my shack. I have a random wire
antenna running within 3 feet of it. No problem at all. "John Brown" wrote in message om... It appears our remodel in our single-family home will have a number of fluorescent light fixtures. Does anyone out there have these in your home and experience any noise that bothers your 160-10 m operation? Should a new installation and new bulbs produce very little noise? I would like to hear any experiences, including any work-arounds. Regards, Ted, K6KIM |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|