Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been getting a lot spam hawking this filter. My question is, do these
filters really work or are they a rip-off? 73's |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote in message news:ttSvb.81594$Dw6.389754@attbi_s02... I've been getting a lot spam hawking this filter. My question is, do these filters really work or are they a rip-off? 73's well, lets see... if they did work, they would be illegal. if you bought one and it didn't work and you wanted to complain that a product that would be illegal didn't work, who would listen? what do you think? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The filter will not get you any free HBO or Skinemax. It may block the return path on 2-way systems - it seems that people are selling anything that looks like a filter as a 'digital descrambler'. I have seen 5-13 traps, attenuator pads, AC blocks, etc being pushed as descramblers. With the return path blocked, the box will not send back pay per view 'buys' to the cable company. Sound cool? well . . . The cable companies have known about 2-way boxes not reporting their status before the filters - only difference now is that they are more hardcore in reacting, when they used to just disable PPV, now they shut off either the entire premium lineup or the entire box. When the filter user reports that the box is dead, they are told to exchange it. When it gets back to the QC lab all the PPV buys are reported and the user gets a whopping bill. "Joe" wrote: I've been getting a lot spam hawking this filter. My question is, do these filters really work or are they a rip-off? 73's -- "From spongecake to satellites, it's gotta be Krebstar" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crank up mast homebrew plans?? | Antenna | |||
Coax cable interferance? | Antenna | |||
Indoor Wireless Cable TV Transmission | Antenna | |||
50 ohm or 75 ohm cable foe dipole? | Antenna |