Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 24th 03, 06:44 AM
Xtx99
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem??

I'm finally getting ready to make the jump from 2m/70cm to an old Kenwood
TS-520SE which I purchased several years ago. My available antenna space is
very limited, and I'm therefore looking at a Van Gorden PD-4010 parallel dipole
(10/20/15/40, 66 feet long) or a Van Gorden "Shorty" Dipole (160-10 with
antenna tuner). The maximum run I have is about 70 feet (and I'll probably use
about 75 feet of RG-8). Unfortunately the dipole must run about 15 feet off
ground level and one half of the dipole would have to be run about a foot from
the side of a wooden house. Approximately 10 feet higher than the dipole on
the side of the house is a rain gutter (probably aluminum). Would this be a
problem? (high swr, etc.) Any suggestions are appreciated.
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 24th 03, 09:11 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 24 Nov 2003 05:44:26 GMT, (Xtx99) wrote:

I'm finally getting ready to make the jump from 2m/70cm to an old Kenwood
TS-520SE which I purchased several years ago. My available antenna space is
very limited, and I'm therefore looking at a Van Gorden PD-4010 parallel dipole
(10/20/15/40, 66 feet long) or a Van Gorden "Shorty" Dipole (160-10 with
antenna tuner). The maximum run I have is about 70 feet (and I'll probably use
about 75 feet of RG-8). Unfortunately the dipole must run about 15 feet off
ground level and one half of the dipole would have to be run about a foot from
the side of a wooden house. Approximately 10 feet higher than the dipole on
the side of the house is a rain gutter (probably aluminum). Would this be a
problem? (high swr, etc.) Any suggestions are appreciated.


Hi OM,

Actually, your problems is no less common than many, and they do quite
well. This doesn't mean that it will be cake walk, however.

One antenna that attempts to be all bands must invariably disappoint
somewhere. Given the proximity of ground, issues of being within 1
foot of your house doesn't really add any more problems. Getting
higher should be a goal (why does your gutter have the 10 foot
advantage?) rather than further away.

Yes, being close to the house can present possible problems, but
trying first is quicker than worrying forever. If it does, reduce the
size of the dipole. Small dipoles have loss (all things considered),
but not so much to deafen or mute your signals. You can force your
truncated dipole to perform, or turn it into a top-loaded vertical
(drive both sides of the transmission line at the drop, against a
modest radial field). Same investment in time, money, and real-estate
and you move past the problem when and if it arises.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 26th 03, 01:11 AM
Steve Silverwood
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
says...
I'm finally getting ready to make the jump from 2m/70cm to an old Kenwood
TS-520SE which I purchased several years ago. My available antenna space is
very limited, and I'm therefore looking at a Van Gorden PD-4010 parallel dipole
(10/20/15/40, 66 feet long) or a Van Gorden "Shorty" Dipole (160-10 with
antenna tuner). The maximum run I have is about 70 feet (and I'll probably use
about 75 feet of RG-8). Unfortunately the dipole must run about 15 feet off
ground level and one half of the dipole would have to be run about a foot from
the side of a wooden house. Approximately 10 feet higher than the dipole on
the side of the house is a rain gutter (probably aluminum). Would this be a
problem? (high swr, etc.) Any suggestions are appreciated.


Given the choice between the two, I would go with the PD-4010 antenna.
I've used that one before and it's a good one. You have some
difficulties in the physical constraings you specified, but not
insurmountable. String it up and give it a go. Run fairly low power
for starters, avoid going above 10 or 15 watts if you can -- my guess is
you're in a fairly crowded neighborhood or you wouldn't have such
physical limitations, so throttle back to low power and see if you
encounter any interference reports before cranking it up to the full
100w that the 520 will do.

--

-- //Steve//

Steve Silverwood, KB6OJS
Fountain Valley, CA
Email:

Web:
http://home.earthlink.net/~kb6ojs_steve
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 11:22 PM
Pls comment on this dipole Steve Antenna 6 October 15th 03 01:08 AM
shortened dipole loaded Jerry Antenna 11 October 2nd 03 01:57 AM
10m dipole and tuner G. Doughty Antenna 11 September 25th 03 04:05 AM
Comet VA30 (base loaded tri-band dipole 40/15/10) PA3HHO Antenna 2 September 1st 03 08:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017