Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
c schrieb:
Hello All, I have comparisation information from 20 different Diamond antennas (verticals). For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz. Compare the gain and the length. All information is to see in a nice chart! http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics). 73's Cor That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht ... c schrieb: Hello All, I have comparisation information from 20 different Diamond antennas (verticals). For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz. Compare the gain and the length. All information is to see in a nice chart! http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics). 73's Cor That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! Please be a bit creative yourself. And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... Rene |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rene schrieb:
That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! just one example: you see with first glance that the claimed gain figures are much to high, how can an antenna 30% longer than a halfwave show 3dbs of gain and 1/4 Lambda more yields in another 1,5db more gain? Please be a bit creative yourself. I have always been... And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Rene Peter |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been a Netscape user for almost 8 years. I refuse to use IE!!
I spent years writing HTML based web pages in HTML!! And, I always Beta tested my pages against all available browsers. The current software for designing web sites is compliant with the Bill Gates world, but, the world is bigger than Bill Gates. Deacon Dave, W1MCE Peter Völpel wrote: Rene schrieb: That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! just one example: you see with first glance that the claimed gain figures are much to high, how can an antenna 30% longer than a halfwave show 3dbs of gain and 1/4 Lambda more yields in another 1,5db more gain? Please be a bit creative yourself. I have always been... And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Rene Peter |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Shrader wrote:
I have been a Netscape user for almost 8 years. I refuse to use IE!! I spent years writing HTML based web pages in HTML!! And, I always Beta tested my pages against all available browsers. The current software for designing web sites is compliant with the Bill Gates world, but, the world is bigger than Bill Gates. Deacon Dave, W1MCE Right Dave, And that page failed the W3C makeup validation just from the beginning... Peter,DF3KV |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht ... Rene schrieb: And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Yes. I know that. It has a nice religious feel around it, bashing Microsoft. Rene |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve KA4TMB" schreef in bericht ... "Dave Shrader" wrote in message news:gMaSa.97008$N7.12123@sccrnsc03... I have been a Netscape user for almost 8 years. I refuse to use IE!! Dave, the context of "I refuse", is nothing more than an attitude adjustment problem. ;-) I spent years writing HTML based web pages in HTML!! And, I always Beta tested my pages against all available browsers. I've written HTML-based web pages also. And of course I always Beta test my pages as well. However "all available browsers" includes only two: NS and IE. My final tests always come out correct when testing with IE. Usually there is some little quirk with NS. That is the reason for the statement at the bottom of the page, "This site best viewed with Internet Explorer", and includes a graphic link to MS if you want to download the IE browser. You can view the web pages with NS if you want, but the "disclaimer" is there for a reason. The guidelines that govern what nomenclature is used to make up HTML code has some differences between NS and IE. Until both companies agree on the same actual code, there will always be problems - unless you know *both* variants of HTML programming. The current software for designing web sites is compliant with the Bill Gates world, but, the world is bigger than Bill Gates. Yes, it is. But not by much :-) Deacon Dave, W1MCE Ordained Minister Steve, KA4TMB Really Ordained, or jus because I wrote Microsoft bashing has (for some people) a nice religious feeling? Rene |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve KA4TMB" schreef in bericht ... "Rene" wrote in message ... "Steve KA4TMB" schreef in bericht ... Ordained Minister Steve, KA4TMB Really Ordained, or jus because I wrote Microsoft bashing has (for some people) a nice religious feeling? Rene Ordained, really. But trust me, I have done enough Microsoft bashing (complaining?) in my time. Ever since MS-DOS 1.0 came out. I just couldn't resist Deacon Dave's signature. :-) I normally never use my "title" on the Internet or on the air (ham radio). I'm just... Steve Yes. I don't use any title too. I am an elder in our church and a MSc. Bye, Rene PD1ALD |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Peter,
I saw again your negative comments. Renember my diamond info is based on dBi, 2,15 less and you get dbd. Do you think diamond want to risk there name to put some false gain numbers on the antenna? If a antenne does not do what it is expect to do we can claim the money back. Do you realy think diamond would take that risk? Why do you think diamond has verry expensive measure equipment? Im wondering were your homepage is, I asume everything must be perfect on your homepage. So maybe you done a lot of work too (like i did), so there might be some intresting info? (let us know!). I saw it wasn't ready on qsl.net server. Cor "Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht ... c schrieb: Hello All, I have comparisation information from 20 different Diamond antennas (verticals). For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz. Compare the gain and the length. All information is to see in a nice chart! http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics). 73's Cor That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello All,
Sorry for the netscape users. I used netscape browser many years back, Im glad with the microsoft browser. Netscape gave me some problems with some goverment page's (wich microsoft ie doesn't). Netscape does not know all the html code's like the fixed function in the background sentence (and many more). These fixed command is verry famous in the internet world. But do not worrie netscape comes with updates they are always a littlebit later than microsoft! Cor |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna |