Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
It seems that my location boasts 60 to 110 mph winds on a regular basis. I had put up a 1/4 wavelength 20m vertical with 1/8 wavelength radials elevated at 7 feet, with rope guys... and the wind blew it apart like so much tin foil! Does anyone know of a decent commercial design for less than $1000 for a free standing 30 to 40 foot support that can take this darn wind??? Thanks, The Eternal Squire |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It begs the question, what was it made of? It must have been very thin metal
to blow apart only 16 feet, guyed by ropes. Please enlighten us. wrote in message oups.com... Hi, It seems that my location boasts 60 to 110 mph winds on a regular basis. I had put up a 1/4 wavelength 20m vertical with 1/8 wavelength radials elevated at 7 feet, with rope guys... and the wind blew it apart like so much tin foil! Does anyone know of a decent commercial design for less than $1000 for a free standing 30 to 40 foot support that can take this darn wind??? Thanks, The Eternal Squire |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ground system:
5 foot of 1 inch diameter galvanized iron pipe, halfway stuck in ground with concrete. 1 inch diameter galvanized coupler 5 foot of 1 inch diameter galvanized pipe 1 inch to 3/4 inch copper reducer 1 foot of 3/4 inch copper pipe 4 tees: 3/4 inch thru vs 1/2 inch out, soldered lengthwise along copper pipe. an 8 foot length of 1/2 inch copper pipe soldered into each tee tees are reinforced above and below radials with a hose clamp coax shield connected to top of copper pipe Radiator: 10 feet of 3/4 inch diameter copper pipe 9 foot carbon fiber fishing rod, handle epoxied and inserted into pipe a wire is attached to copper pipe and run up to end of rod. Hot end of coax connected to bottom of copper pipe Ground system and Radiator are connected in-line with a PVC twist shaft coupler designed for 3/4 inch pipe, weather sealed with epoxy. A gap of 1 inch between pipes inside the coupler is filled with styrofoam to prevent contact. Rope guys are econnected to the top part of the shaft coupler, as the middle of the shaft coupler is predicted to be weakest point. Sure enough, a continuous wind in excess of 60 mph vibrated the shaft coupler into 2 pieces despite the guys, the radiator then collided with a radial, knocking a radial out of alignment and ripping apart a hose clamp. I suspect the wind is going to finish the job overnight. Sigh, The Eternal Squire |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dude it's 60-100 mph wind! You're gonna have to shell out bucks to make
anything that can stand up to that for any length of time. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Hi, It seems that my location boasts 60 to 110 mph winds on a regular basis. I had put up a 1/4 wavelength 20m vertical with 1/8 wavelength radials elevated at 7 feet, with rope guys... and the wind blew it apart like so much tin foil! Does anyone know of a decent commercial design for less than $1000 for a free standing 30 to 40 foot support that can take this darn wind??? Thanks, The Eternal Squire I use a fishing rod with a wire centre conductor for 40 metres band (33`without guys), with a 5` mounting pole buried in the ground ....you ought to see that mother bend ...... hasn`t fallen or blown down yet!!! ;-) Lee.......G6ZSG..... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Hi, It seems that my location boasts 60 to 110 mph winds on a regular basis. I had put up a 1/4 wavelength 20m vertical with 1/8 wavelength radials elevated at 7 feet, with rope guys... and the wind blew it apart like so much tin foil! Same kind of location here, wide open to the Irish Sea.... but that wasn't a big antenna, and with the guys it certainly should have stayed up. You're missing something here. Typical ham antenna structures are a mixture of over-design and weak spots, so maybe you should look at the wreckage in more detail and try to learn something from it. OK, I just read your second posting and pulled this back from the outbox. From the top downwards... * Fishing rod good. Carbon fibre not good (possibility of losses and detuning compared with plain fibreglass; definite loss of money compared with plain fg). * Copper pipe not good in these long lengths. Ask yourself why everyone else uses aluminium. * PVC pipe coupler not good... well, that you know. * Again, copper pipes not good for radials. Copper pipe tees not good for supports. If the top part hadn't fallen down, those pipe tees would probably have been next to go. * 3/4-in copper for your main support mast is a big mistake. The heavy radials flopping up and down create a huge leverage at this point, so that copper will be rapidly work-hardening and well on its way to breaking (may well have done so by your morning). * In your wind conditions, 1-in galvanized pipe is way too small for the lower part of your mast. The only thing that kept it from snapping is that something else broke first. * Were your guys helping to reduce the bending forces at the point where the coupling snapped... or helping to concentrate them? In your particular case, I'd bet the latter. The big lesson is that the construction of a copper J-pole for 2m will not scale up to 20m wavelengths... basically because copper tubing is a poor structural material, and as the model-makers say, "You can't scale Nature." When you increase the scale by 10x, you have to use different structural materials and techniques. Again, ask yourself why everyone else uses larger tubing for masts; uses aluminium, not copper; and doesn't use small, soft plastic plumbing fittings. Have a look at HF antenna construction in the antenna handbooks and catalogues, and do what they do... because there's a reason for it. Does anyone know of a decent commercial design for less than $1000 for Hang on now - that would be spending money to *avoid* learning something. a free standing 30 to 40 foot support that can take this darn wind??? One option that's surviving very strong winds here is a tapering fibreglass pole. I'm using a Spiderbeam telescopic pole that is almost 40ft high and strongly made: www.spiderbeam.net/english/pole.php The pole is tied to a very solid clothes-line post at about 7ft, and also guyed at about the 30ft level to prevent the worst of the swaying. In very strong winds it bends into an alarming S-shape, but by the nature of fibreglass it also springs back again. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had put up a 1/4 wavelength 20m vertical with 1/8 wavelength
radials elevated at 7 feet, with rope guys... and the wind blew it apart like so much tin foil! It decided to blow it down so you could rebuild it with the proper length radials... ![]() use those? They are fairly useless on an elevated ground plane. The decoupling of the feedline will be poor, and probably lots of rf in the shack. Needs 1/4 wave radials to work correctly. As far as the wind, you need to build a little stouter... Normally, a short 16 ft radiator should be easy to keep up, even with 60 mph winds. Shouldn't fall down if it was guyed. My 40 m ground plane was 32 ft tall, mounted at 36 ft. Nearly 70 ft tall at the top. Only my mast was guyed. No guys were used on the radiator. I used a telescoping metal mast which shrunk down to a very thin size as it neared the top. Was quite flexible. In heavy storms, it would nearly blow sideways, but it never hurt it, and it always popped back up straight after the wind left. That particular antenna cost nothing..Made from an old butchered up 5/8 wave CB antenna as the base radiator, and then extended with extra tubing. Was looking at your 2nd post, and notice the details. Not exactly the recipe for a solid antenna...You would be better off using an old butchered CB antenna, etc. The cushcraft AR-10 makes a good platform for verticals also. It's a 16-18 ft 1/2 wave antenna for 10m. If you use only the radiator, and redesign the feed, thats a decent quicky 20m 1/4 wave vertical. The old heavy duty 5/8 CB antennas are good to use also. They have heavy duty bases that are often reinforced. Thats what I use for my tall 40m antenna, and never had a problem, but I did strengthen by adding extra tubing , inside the tubing. IE: double wall... Copper is pretty soft, and shouldn't be used for anything that needs real strength. MK |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, pure aluminium is even softer and far more ductile than
copper and is useless as a construction material. But some grades of copper/aluminium alloy, known in the UK as Duraluminum or just Dural, have properties approaching carbon steel and are corrosion resistant. Light in weight. Easily machined and extruded. Maintain a good appearance. High electrical conductivity. More expensive than steel. They are used, for example, for ladders and scaffold poles. When used for tubular rigid dipoles and antenna masts they collapse under high winds only because the wall thickness is too thin. Commonly used for radio chassis and sheet metal roofs. But NOT pure aluminium, just a few percent of copper. ---- Reg. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message . com... wrote: It seems that my location boasts 60 to 110 mph winds on a regular basis. I had put up a 1/4 wavelength 20m vertical with 1/8 wavelength radials elevated at 7 feet, with rope guys... and the wind blew it apart like so much tin foil! I use 2x(2"x4"s) fastened together for a 4"x4" support and 1/4WL wire radials as ground-plane/guy-wires. The vertical section is assembled from 6' telescoping aluminum sections following the beam element design guidelines in the ARRL Antenna Book. The top 8.5' is a stainless steel CB whip. It has withstood wind gusts of about 100 mph. As others have said, copper is a poor choice for a 20m vertical. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
HF Vertical design(s) | Antenna | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna |