Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's a figure at the bottom of
http://www.tpub.com/neets/book10/42.htm that shows current distribution on an antenna. Is there some book or source that describes how figures B and C and produced? I'm guessing that one starts with an open ended transmission line, and looks at how the E and B fields are distributed along it. Then one peels the open end back until the two lines are pointing away from one another. One then ends up with E fields pretty much in a plane directed from one point on one side of the wire to the similar point on the other wire. Similarly the B fields encircle each wire. On one side they have a CC direction and the other a CC direction (looking in the direction of the current). As a separate item, it would also seem that for a transmission line that is open ended the current flowing in one wire induces a current to flow in the opposite direction in the other wire. That is the current flows in the one wire because it does so by induction rather than it being physically part of the other wire. Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet -- "I often quote myself - it adds spice to my conversation." - George Bernard Shaw Web Page: home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
W. Watson wrote:
There's a figure at the bottom of http://www.tpub.com/neets/book10/42.htm that shows current distribution on an antenna. Is there some book or source that describes how figures B and C and produced? A lot of authors of antenna and electromagnetics texts avoid the issue. There's a decent analysis in King, Mimno, and Wing, _Transmission Lines, Antennas, and Waveguides_. The problem is much more difficult when the antenna is longer than a half wavelength or when the wire diameter becomes significant. In those cases, a much more complex calculation is necessary, with only approximate results being available from closed form solutions. Numerical solution of a triple integral equation is the method usually used. That approach is necessary when there are nearby current-carrying conductors, since that alters the current distribution in ways which are usually too complex for other methods. A brief discussion of several methods of approaching the problem can be found in Sec. 14.11, "The Cylindrical Antenna Problem", in Jordan and Balmain, _Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems". I'm guessing that one starts with an open ended transmission line, and looks at how the E and B fields are distributed along it. Then one peels the open end back until the two lines are pointing away from one another. One then ends up with E fields pretty much in a plane directed from one point on one side of the wire to the similar point on the other wire. Similarly the B fields encircle each wire. On one side they have a CC direction and the other a CC direction (looking in the direction of the current). Using a transmission line as an analogy for antenna operation works just well enough to be dangerous. While it's a way to get an intuitive understanding of antenna operation, taking it too far can lead to some erroneous conclusions. One fundamental limitation is that classical analysis of a transmission line depends on the assumption that no radiation occurs, and that's certainly not the case for an antenna. As a separate item, it would also seem that for a transmission line that is open ended the current flowing in one wire induces a current to flow in the opposite direction in the other wire. That is the current flows in the one wire because it does so by induction rather than it being physically part of the other wire. Yes, that's correct. If you assume that the entire field from one wire couples to the other, which is strictly true for coax and approximately true for twinlead, it follows from Ampere's law that the current on one wire must be equal and opposite that on the other. This assumption of field coupling isn't true for an antenna, although coupling does indeed exist and it does have a profound effect on the currents. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
W. Watson wrote: There's a figure at the bottom of http://www.tpub.com/neets/book10/42.htm that shows current distribution on an antenna. Is there some book or source that describes how figures B and C and produced? A lot of authors of antenna and electromagnetics texts avoid the issue. There's a decent analysis in King, Mimno, and Wing, _Transmission Lines, Antennas, and Waveguides_. The problem is much more difficult when the antenna is longer than a half wavelength or when the wire diameter becomes significant. In those cases, a much more complex calculation is necessary, with only approximate results being available from closed form solutions. Numerical solution of a triple integral equation is the method usually used. That approach is necessary when there are nearby current-carrying conductors, since that alters the current distribution in ways which are usually too complex for other methods. A brief discussion of several methods of approaching the problem can be found in Sec. 14.11, "The Cylindrical Antenna Problem", in Jordan and Balmain, _Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems". I'm guessing that one starts with an open ended transmission line, and looks at how the E and B fields are distributed along it. Then one peels the open end back until the two lines are pointing away from one another. One then ends up with E fields pretty much in a plane directed from one point on one side of the wire to the similar point on the other wire. Similarly the B fields encircle each wire. On one side they have a CC direction and the other a CC direction (looking in the direction of the current). Using a transmission line as an analogy for antenna operation works just well enough to be dangerous. While it's a way to get an intuitive understanding of antenna operation, taking it too far can lead to some erroneous conclusions. One fundamental limitation is that classical analysis of a transmission line depends on the assumption that no radiation occurs, and that's certainly not the case for an antenna. As a separate item, it would also seem that for a transmission line that is open ended the current flowing in one wire induces a current to flow in the opposite direction in the other wire. That is the current flows in the one wire because it does so by induction rather than it being physically part of the other wire. Yes, that's correct. If you assume that the entire field from one wire couples to the other, which is strictly true for coax and approximately true for twinlead, it follows from Ampere's law that the current on one wire must be equal and opposite that on the other. This assumption of field coupling isn't true for an antenna, although coupling does indeed exist and it does have a profound effect on the currents. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Thanks very much for the comments. They were helpful. I managed to find "Neets Module 10-Introduction to Wave Propagation, Transmission Lines, and Antennas", a Naval Electrical Engineering book on the web at Neets Module 10-Introduction to Wave Propagation, Transmission Lines, and Antennas. It comes close to giving this subject a pretty reasonable treatment. A pretty fair intro. It gets to the point on a number of items pretty quickly. I think the modules are $3.00 each. They can be purchased on the web, but probably through the Govt. Printing Office. The whole set of Navy manuals is described at http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/. I've seen that diagram on occasion and it has somewhat baffled me, but at least now I have some insight into what's going on. The most recent occurrence was Carr's fourth edition of "Practical Antennas Handbook". These diagrams all appeared out of nowhere as though they were quite obvious to the reader. I got the book through Amazon and have about 10 days on a 30 day period to return it, which I think I will. Unfortunately, Carr died a few years ago, so there will be no new changes to it. It is tempting to look at his software CD for the book to see what antenna design tools are on it. I think I'll resist the temptation though. It would be interesting to know what some sort of total package looked like. I'm curious if there's some general design tool, or it's just a bunch of programs for different antennas. It would be interesting to know if one can start from some general set of requirements and the program would lead the designed to the appropriate design. Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet -- "I often quote myself - it adds spice to my conversation." - George Bernard Shaw Web Page: home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
W. Watson wrote:
I'm guessing that one starts with an open ended transmission line, and looks at how the E and B fields are distributed along it. It's a standing-wave antenna. That means there is a forward wave and a reflected wave. The forward current adds to the reflected current all up and down the dipole. The magnitude of the reflected current arriving back at the feedpoint is approximately 90% of the forward current and are assumed to be approximately equal by Kraus. The forward current and reflected current are very close to being in phase at the feedpoint. The forward and reflected current are equal in magnitude and 180 degrees out of phase at the tip of the dipole. The feedpoint impedance of a 1/2WL dipole is approximately (|Vfor|-|Vref|)/(|Ifor|+|Iref|). The angle of the reflected current is close to equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to the forward current at any point along the dipole so the angle of the net current is very close to zero degrees. The net current pictured on that web page is a standing current wave with the same basic shape as in a 1/4WL open-circuit stub. That current distribution is illustrated in any antenna book, including Kraus and Balanis. It's also in my 15th edition ARRL Antenna Book. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
W. Watson wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: W. Watson wrote: There's a figure at the bottom of http://www.tpub.com/neets/book10/42.htm that shows current .... snip I've seen that diagram on occasion and it has somewhat baffled me, but at least now I have some insight into what's going on. The most recent occurrence was Carr's fourth edition of "Practical Antennas Handbook". These diagrams all appeared out of nowhere as though they were quite obvious to the reader. I got the book through Amazon and have about 10 days on a 30 day period to return it, which I think I will. Unfortunately, Carr died a few years ago, so there will be no new changes to it. It is tempting to look at his software CD for the book to see what antenna design tools are on it. I think I'll resist the temptation though. It would be interesting to know what some sort of total package looked like. I'm curious if there's some general design tool, or it's just a bunch of programs for different antennas. It would be interesting to know if one can start from some general set of requirements and the program would lead the designed to the appropriate design. How about that? I read further into the book and found a whole chapter on the software on the CD. Another quick romp through the book tells me that (I'm inferring this.) that what most of it is about is describing antennas and where they might be used. It looks like a potential catalog of such designs to try out on the software. I don't think that's necessarily the reason why the book was written, but it makes it appealing. I don't see anywhere that all the designs offered could be investigated with the software on the CD. Roy, perhaps you have an answer for the last statement. I see that one of your programs is included. Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet -- "I often quote myself - it adds spice to my conversation." - George Bernard Shaw Web Page: home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
W. Watson wrote:
How about that? I read further into the book and found a whole chapter on the software on the CD. Another quick romp through the book tells me that (I'm inferring this.) that what most of it is about is describing antennas and where they might be used. It looks like a potential catalog of such designs to try out on the software. I don't think that's necessarily the reason why the book was written, but it makes it appealing. I don't see anywhere that all the designs offered could be investigated with the software on the CD. Roy, perhaps you have an answer for the last statement. I see that one of your programs is included. Sorry, I know nothing of the book, except I vaguely recall Joe mentioning that he was including the EZNEC demo program with a book. If you're interested in modeling various antenna designs, consider the _ARRL Antenna Book_. On its CD are several hundred EZNEC models of various antennas discussed in the book, plus a special version of EZNEC which can be used to analyze them (http://eznec.com/eznec_arrl.htm). The Antenna Book models can also be used with any standard (non-demo) version of EZNEC. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
swr question | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Reactive musings | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna |