Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The G5RV antenna can be found by googling. Anyone using this
arrangement. It uses a coax feed to balanced feed (which variously acts as radiating elements, depending on the band). The author says a balun is not needed but then describes an RF choke that sounds a lot like a balun. I am also concerned about TVI with this system. John |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
jawod wrote:
The G5RV antenna can be found by googling. Anyone using this arrangement. It uses a coax feed to balanced feed (which variously acts as radiating elements, depending on the band). The author says a balun is not needed but then describes an RF choke that sounds a lot like a balun. I am also concerned about TVI with this system. http://www.cebik.com/wire/g5rv.html http://www.vk1od.net/G5RV/ -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
jawod wrote:
The G5RV antenna can be found by googling. Anyone using this arrangement. It uses a coax feed to balanced feed (which variously acts as radiating elements, depending on the band). The author says a balun is not needed but then describes an RF choke that sounds a lot like a balun. I am also concerned about TVI with this system. John I'm not crazy about them at all. I'm not a fan of switching feedline types midroute to the antenna. This applies to other antennas as well. The G5RV was designed mainly as a 20 meter antenna. I'm not sure who decided it was the magical platform for a multiband antenna, but someone did... Someone should get a rope I think... :/ You would be much better ditching the coax and choke, and running straight ladder line, if feeding all bands with a tuner. I think coax fed antennas should see a proper match at the feedpoint of the antenna. If I'm going to use coax, I'm going to run coax the whole way. Some run the "carolina" windoms the same way pretty much.. ![]() dipoles against both of these antennas. It was fairly ugly. The simple dipole thrashed both of them handily. There is a good bit of loss in all that feedline clutter. Some bands worse than others. If you are going to run a tuner and ladder line for all band use, a simple dipole on the lowest band to be used is a fairly decent compromise. No need to add excess feedline clutter. And loss. ![]() If you use ladder line all the way, and tune carefully using the least inductance, you will have a fairly efficient system on most all the bands. Most tuners include a 4:1, but some prefer a 1:1 balun instead. MK -- http://web.wt.net/~nm5k |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
To summarise - dump it !
|
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The choke balun is used because the G5RV is fed with balanced line. They
work well, last a long time and require a tuner. I have never had any TVI with one, nor did I ever expect any. "jawod" wrote in message ... The G5RV antenna can be found by googling. Anyone using this arrangement. It uses a coax feed to balanced feed (which variously acts as radiating elements, depending on the band). The author says a balun is not needed but then describes an RF choke that sounds a lot like a balun. I am also concerned about TVI with this system. John |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If SETUP right , There the best HF I've ever used.
|
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ricke wrote:
If SETUP right , There the best HF I've ever used. Maybe the only one? :-) The G5RV, with tuner, is a pretty good 80m, 40m, 20m, and 12m antenna. If the series section is varied from 20 feet to 36 feet, it becomes a very good all-HF-band antenna. With the addition of a parallel 1000pf capacitor with the series section at 22 feet, on 75m my "G5RV" has SWR of 1.3:1 and works as well as a 75m 1/2WL dipole. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi John,
The "Center Feeded Dipole" (feeding with twin-leads) would give you better performances and no TVI. But if you prefer the G5RV do not use any balun (with magnetic stuff). In somme cases, baluns brings losses (if high SWR on the line). You may find many people that will say that their G5RV works perfectly well with a balun ..... they are lucky !!! It is better to connect the coax directly to your antenna tuner. Good luck Jean-Marc F4DRH www.barbaxoops.com "jawod" a écrit dans le message de news: ... The G5RV antenna can be found by googling. Anyone using this arrangement. It uses a coax feed to balanced feed (which variously acts as radiating elements, depending on the band). The author says a balun is not needed but then describes an RF choke that sounds a lot like a balun. I am also concerned about TVI with this system. John |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
F4DRH wrote:
Hi John, The "Center Feeded Dipole" (feeding with twin-leads) would give you better performances and no TVI. But if you prefer the G5RV do not use any balun (with magnetic stuff). In somme cases, baluns brings losses (if high SWR on the line). You may find many people that will say that their G5RV works perfectly well with a balun .... they are lucky !!! It is better to connect the coax directly to your antenna tuner. Good luck Jean-Marc F4DRH www.barbaxoops.com "jawod" a écrit dans le message de news: ... The G5RV antenna can be found by googling. Anyone using this arrangement. It uses a coax feed to balanced feed (which variously acts as radiating elements, depending on the band). The author says a balun is not needed but then describes an RF choke that sounds a lot like a balun. I am also concerned about TVI with this system. John Thanks to all for advice! It seems likely that, as I re-enter ham radio, I will be using a rig with an SO-239 plug as an output. The unit I am considering has an internal ATU. So, it would appear likely that SOME coax will be used. I've read articles that indicate a simple PVC pipe wound with 20 or so turns of coax is sufficient for a coax to dipole configuration. I guess I am trying to have a multiband dipole antenna that uses the low-loss ladder line as part of the antenna on some bands. This seems consistent with the G5RV. Any thoughts on other designs to accomplish this? Many articles seem to steer clear of series traps in the dipole. I must have TVI as a high potential concern.. Anyway THANKS! Jean-Marc: nice antenna system...your twin lead looks like coax...is it? john |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jean-Marc: nice antenna system...your twin lead looks like coax...is it? john Hi John, Here is my twin lead detail: http://www.barbaxoops.com/modules/xc...&album=7&pos=2 .... and the twin lead installed on the center feed (click on picture to enlarge): http://www.barbaxoops.com/modules/xc...&album=7&pos=4 http://www.barbaxoops.com/modules/xc...&album=7&pos=4 The antenna tuner (MacCoy): http://www.barbaxoops.com/modules/xc...&album=7&pos=0 Good luck Jean-Marc F4DRH www.barbaxoops.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |