Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 7th 06, 08:58 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
jimg
 
Posts: n/a
Default 160m antenna

Hi. I'm looking for more creative ideas. I live in a typical suburban
setting. I have a 100' oak tree out back with a clear base of 65' on
to one side; 75' to the other. I've EZNEC'd a variety of antennas from
center fed (ladder line) inverted vee resonant at about 2.4MHz. Moved
to offset fed versions which works over more bands but still not quite
a low enough swr to load with a palstar balanced tuner on 160. Moved
on to a 'triangle' antenna made by adding a wire base to the inverted
vee about 2-' off the ground. Now I've got enough length, but the swr
is squirrely on all abnds because of the interaction of the short legs
(I guess it's a short delta with only the driven element.). So, it
appears I'll have to wait until the kids graduate and a move to the
countryside is in order.
I know it won't work as well as a wavelength loop with a huge mesh
metal fence counterpoise, but it would be nice to try and ragchew on
160m while the sunspot cycle is zilch. Any weird topologies come to
mind? And still let me load up 80/40m?
jimg
Oregon
USA
  #2   Report Post  
Old February 7th 06, 12:57 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default 160m antenna

Be careful when modeling antennas with offset feed. It's very difficult
to prevent common mode current flow on the feedline of offset feed
antennas. You might be able to keep the common mode current down to a
reasonable level with a couple of good current baluns spaced about a
quarter wavelength apart, but otherwise the feedline will be an
important part of the antenna and needs to be included in the model.
You'll have to include the whole conductive path to the Earth in order
to get good accuracy, and this path might not be easy or possible to
determine.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

jimg wrote:
Hi. I'm looking for more creative ideas. I live in a typical suburban
setting. I have a 100' oak tree out back with a clear base of 65' on
to one side; 75' to the other. I've EZNEC'd a variety of antennas from
center fed (ladder line) inverted vee resonant at about 2.4MHz. Moved
to offset fed versions which works over more bands but still not quite
a low enough swr to load with a palstar balanced tuner on 160. Moved
on to a 'triangle' antenna made by adding a wire base to the inverted
vee about 2-' off the ground. Now I've got enough length, but the swr
is squirrely on all abnds because of the interaction of the short legs
(I guess it's a short delta with only the driven element.). So, it
appears I'll have to wait until the kids graduate and a move to the
countryside is in order.
I know it won't work as well as a wavelength loop with a huge mesh
metal fence counterpoise, but it would be nice to try and ragchew on
160m while the sunspot cycle is zilch. Any weird topologies come to
mind? And still let me load up 80/40m?
jimg
Oregon
USA

  #3   Report Post  
Old February 7th 06, 01:09 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Larry Gauthier \(K8UT\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default 160m antenna

Jim,

Have you thought about going vertical? I'm lucky enough to have room for a
160m dipole, but also have created a shunt-fed 160m vertical from my
existing tower. The vertical is barely adequate for "local" QSOs but
outperforms the dipole beyond several hundred miles.

I also notice that Cushcraft has just released a commercial 160m shortened
vertical (30-36 feet). I have not seen any reviews of this antenna yet --
and would generally prefer to build-it-myself -- but there may be some
characteristics of the antenna that you could employ.

-larry
K8UT
"jimg" wrote in message
...
Hi. I'm looking for more creative ideas. I live in a typical suburban
setting. I have a 100' oak tree out back with a clear base of 65' on
to one side; 75' to the other. I've EZNEC'd a variety of antennas from
center fed (ladder line) inverted vee resonant at about 2.4MHz. Moved
to offset fed versions which works over more bands but still not quite
a low enough swr to load with a palstar balanced tuner on 160. Moved
on to a 'triangle' antenna made by adding a wire base to the inverted
vee about 2-' off the ground. Now I've got enough length, but the swr
is squirrely on all abnds because of the interaction of the short legs
(I guess it's a short delta with only the driven element.). So, it
appears I'll have to wait until the kids graduate and a move to the
countryside is in order.
I know it won't work as well as a wavelength loop with a huge mesh
metal fence counterpoise, but it would be nice to try and ragchew on
160m while the sunspot cycle is zilch. Any weird topologies come to
mind? And still let me load up 80/40m?
jimg
Oregon
USA



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grounding Steve Rabinowitz Shortwave 31 December 14th 05 06:26 AM
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? RHF Shortwave 5 November 6th 05 05:52 AM
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) RHF Shortwave 15 September 13th 05 09:28 AM
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna RHF Shortwave 1 January 24th 05 10:37 PM
LongWire Antenna Jim B Shortwave 5 March 2nd 04 10:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017