Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes I should know this.. However an issue has come up in my place of
work I am trying to get my head around. On a 10GHz microwave TX there is a stripline parallel to the output track that is suppose to detect forward power. Nothing strange about that. What is weird is that it appears to be roughly a half wave length (or more). The question is this. If one hangs a 1/2 wave dipole in free space I assume it receives such that current maximums are at the centre and voltage maxiums at the ends. Is this the case whether a feedline is connected or not? If I then take a stripline cct terminated at one end with a 50r resistor and a detect diode at the other and is a half wave long, what is the current/voltage distribution in this configuration. What I wonder is if it is a halfwave there may be no voltage at the detect diode input. (It could be 3/4 wavelength when one factors in pcb dielectric and end loading) Thoughts? Cheers Bob VK2YQA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Bob wrote:
If I then take a stripline cct terminated at one end with a 50r resistor and a detect diode at the other and is a half wave long, what is the current/voltage distribution in this configuration. Since the ends of the 1/2WL conductor are open circuits, standing waves on the conductor are the result. The standing wave(s) consists of the superposition of the forward wave(s) and the reflected wave(s). This is exactly why the forward and reflected waves cannot be ignored (as some gurus advise) if understanding is the goal. For a 1/2WL conductor, the standing wave has a cosine envelope with a phase near zero all along the line because the forward and reflected phasors are rotating in opposite directions. The current is obviously zero at the ends and maximum in the center. The resistor termination at one end dissipates either the forward wave or reflected wave depending upon which end it is located. The dipole at the other end rectifies the other wave. If you are measuring the forward power, the forward wave is rectified by the diode and the reflected wave is dissipated/attenuated by the resistor. I have an old Heathkit SWR meter that operates the same way. There's two pickup conductors, one for forward power and one for reflected power. In short, the resistor dissipates one of the component traveling waves thus preventing reflections while the diode rectifies the other traveling wave, thus providing a voltage proportional to that other traveling wave. Which wave is dissipated and which wave is rectified depends upon which end of the conductor the resistor and diode are located. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
With 50 Ohms at the end, I suppose the line is producing progressive waves
and not standing waves, and no matter its length 73 André F5AD http://f5ad.free.fr |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clearly in a center-fed half-wave dipole, if there is no load at the
center, the current there is quite low, and depends on the capacitance from wire end to wire end. If you short across the feedpoint, it will be resonant and the center will be a current node. In the case of coupled microstrip hybrids, maximum coupling occurs at odd multiples of 1/4 wavelength, and falls to zero at even multiples of 1/4 wavelength -- that is, at multiples of 1/2 wavelength. If you DON'T properly terminate one end of the coupled line, you'll loose directivity because of reflections at that end. I suspect that if you include the propagation velocity of the microstrip, you'll find that it's not a half-wave long. Cheers, Tom |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K7ITM wrote:
Clearly in a center-fed half-wave dipole, if there is no load at the center, the current there is quite low, and depends on the capacitance from wire end to wire end. If you short across the feedpoint, it will be resonant and the center will be a current node. Maybe you would like to rethink that, Tom. Consider a parasitic 1/2WL element on a Yagi. The currents at the ends are obviously zero. The current 1/4WL away from the zero points are the maximum current points. If you short across the feedpoint of a 1/2WL dipole, it will be resonant but the center will be a current loop (antinode), i.e. a maximum current point. The center of a *one wavelength* dipole will be a current node. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:25:32 -0600, Bob Bob wrote:
The question is this. If one hangs a 1/2 wave dipole in free space I assume it receives such that current maximums are at the centre and voltage maxiums at the ends. Is this the case whether a feedline is connected or not? Yes. If I then take a stripline cct terminated at one end with a 50r resistor and a detect diode at the other and is a half wave long, what is the current/voltage distribution in this configuration. The point of your need at work is to insure that stripline presents a 50 Ohm characteristic as an untuned line, not a resonant line. Of course, you can perform the same using a tuned line, but this seems unlikely barring new details offered by you. What I wonder is if it is a halfwave there may be no voltage at the detect diode input. (It could be 3/4 wavelength when one factors in pcb dielectric and end loading) And this would be reason why to NOT have it be a resonant line. I presume there's a ground in the vicinity for both this sniffer section and the main feed (which also needs to exhibit a characteristic Z). Such devices are generally useful over an octave range. Thoughts? This, of course, does require attention to factors such as pcb dielectric as you have already taken care of end loading with the resistor and the diode. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I earlier wrote, "If you short across the feedpoint, it will
be resonant and the center will be a current node." Belay that. Change it to, "If you short across the feedpoint, it will be resonant and the center will be a current maximum." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard, Cecil and Tom
I should explain the "problem" somewhat. The transmitter designs I believe are not very good. Perhaps they were designed to work on a different or narrower frequency and were hastily adapted by beancounters instead of designers. grin What is happening is that at a certain critical band of freqs (around 11.2GHz) the output from the detect diode is very close to zero and hence the power control (via ALC) and calibration table dont work too well. Thinking it was a design issue I actually moved the ref diode to the limit of its pads and the problem resolved itself. The effect was of course to make the sensor length electrically shorter by doing this. I was trying to establish whether I had a 1/2 or 3/4 wavelength sensor section to maybe take it up with engineering. (No doubt for another frequency I would move it in the opposite direction) I suspect there is also another issue whereby the resonant sensor section is actually absorbing more power than it should and dissipating it in the resistor. The effect of this being a loss of available output power at the SMA connector. Keep in mind that I am a production line tech rather than a designer. I am not suppose to modify things, only test and align! (Am actually an IT professional but had trouble finding that line of work!) Many thanks for your input. As usual with you gents I am going to have to work through it all slowly! To answer you specifically Richard, the PCB is a multilayer fibreglass thing with a largish ground being under both the output and sensor striplines. I was surprised that the sensor line was so long and so close when I first saw it thinking some major overcoupling might be occurring. The tracks are maybe 3mm wide and about 1.5mm (edges) apart. I am thinking also that the 50 ohm output is not being preserved as it goes past the sensor stripline. I think the freq coverage for this model is about 10.5 to 11.5GHz. Keep in mind that this really is the frist time I have seen microwave TX's up close so my gut feelings about track sizes/spacing may be way off. Cheers Bob VK2YQA |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob, VK2YQA wrote:
"The question is this. If one hangs a 1/2-wave dipole in free space I assume it receives such that current maximums are at the centre and voltage maximums at the ends. Is this the case whether a feedline is connected or not?" Yes, but you must have continuity between both halves of the dipole. If you disconnect the feedline leaving an open circuit gap in the dipole at its centre, you no longer have a 1/2-wave dipole of the same frequency. You have (2) lengths of wire and each has its first resonance at about twice the frequency of first resonance of your original dipole. Best rergards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:35:01 -0600, Bob Bob wrote:
I suspect there is also another issue whereby the resonant sensor section is actually absorbing more power than it should and dissipating it in the resistor. Hi Bob, That is why it is there, among other reasons. The effect of this being a loss of available output power at the SMA connector. This is a symptom, and should not be a cause. To answer you specifically Richard, the PCB is a multilayer fibreglass thing with a largish ground being under both the output and sensor striplines. That is as it should be. I was surprised that the sensor line was so long and so On the order of 1.5 cM? close when I first saw it thinking some major overcoupling might be occurring. The tracks are maybe 3mm wide and about 1.5mm (edges) apart. Sounds like a boilerplate design - which is to say right out of some book or App. Note. I am thinking also that the 50 ohm output is not being preserved as it goes past the sensor stripline. What does that mean? I think the freq coverage for this model is about 10.5 to 11.5GHz. Keep in mind that this really is the frist time I have seen microwave TX's up close so my gut feelings about track sizes/spacing may be way off. Check the resistor. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[question] current/voltage amplitude inducted in antenna | Antenna |