Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
I have owned the book for about 15 years and now I am hearing aout errors. does anyone have a list of them? AB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nobody's books or publications are bibles.
Not even Terman's or B.L & E's. ---- Reg |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Reg Edwards wrote: Nobody's books or publications are bibles. Not even Terman's or B.L & E's. ---- Reg Nobody's books or publications are bibles.\ What are we supposed to believe? It would take many years to verify all that has been printed over the last 100 years. If I am a ham and I wish to put up an antenna, what should I do? Surely not refer to to the Bibles. Gary N4AST ========================================== Nobody understands the bibles without a great deal of study. They are full of mistakes anyway. Most of them were written just to make a living. Its easy to understand what THAT leads to. Just put up some wire and you will learn more in a few hours of listening and transmitting than a lifetime of reading about it. ---- Reg. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fully admit my antenna programs are not bibles.
They are merely my idea of how things can be modelled. In general they are well inside the ball park. They serve their intended purpose. What better quality can you ask for? I am a Fellow of the British Institute of Quality Asurance but I don't brag about it. ---- Reg. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
An interesting point of view. I have been participating in a Bible
Study program for the last three years based on the Old Testament and the New Testament. One of the more important things I have learned is that there are many inconsistencies and cases of ambiguity. We are fortunate in all cases that someone was willing to sit down and put the documents together so that we could enjoy the benefits of their studies! If Terman made an error, I can forgive him. My copy is older than I am... Sometimes a published error is what it takes to get the right answer. BTW, thanks for all the programs Reg. I am learning a lot from them! On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 22:59:52 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards" wrote: Nobody's books or publications are bibles. Not even Terman's or B.L & E's. ---- Reg John Ferrell W8CCW |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Richardson k6mheatadelphia wrote:
Including Reg's factoids. Hey Danny, I think you need to reset your clock. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 22:59:52 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: Nobody's books or publications are bibles. Not even Terman's or B.L & E's. Indeed, Reg. It's always struck me as rather annoying that there are more errors in books on electronics than in any other published subject _bar none_ to my knowledge. I can think of no text book that is entirely error-free with the _possible_ exception of Art of Electronics. Most of the errors in radio & electronics tomes are related to ambiguous authoring, but there is a regrettably large number of outright errors (examples calculations or fundamental misunderstanding on the part of the writer) that are utterly poisonous snake oil to the unwitting and unguided student. Chris Bowick's 'RF Circuit Design' springs to mind here! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 22:59:52 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: Nobody's books or publications are bibles. Not even Terman's or B.L & E's. ---- Reg Including Reg's factoids. Danny |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Out of curiosity, what are some examples of error's in Bowick's book? I've
probably passed right by them. Then again, I miss a lot of obvious things. I slept till 1pm on Sept 11, 2001 -- I had no idea what was going on that day. Robert "Paul Burridge" k wrote in message ... On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 22:59:52 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards" wrote: Nobody's books or publications are bibles. Not even Terman's or B.L & E's. Indeed, Reg. It's always struck me as rather annoying that there are more errors in books on electronics than in any other published subject _bar none_ to my knowledge. I can think of no text book that is entirely error-free with the _possible_ exception of Art of Electronics. Most of the errors in radio & electronics tomes are related to ambiguous authoring, but there is a regrettably large number of outright errors (examples calculations or fundamental misunderstanding on the part of the writer) that are utterly poisonous snake oil to the unwitting and unguided student. Chris Bowick's 'RF Circuit Design' springs to mind here! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Of Asteroids and Dinosaurs | Policy | |||
New Smith Chart Program - "SmartSmith" | Antenna | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Could This Be The Solution? | Policy | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |