Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A loading coil thread is climaxing over on qrz.com. I have
used EZNEC to generate a graphic which shows a 3/4WL vertical and a similar 1/2WL vertical with a ~1/4WL loading coil. The loading coil is a wire helical coil containing (surprise) roughly 1/4WL of wire. The coil does a good (not perfect) job of replacing 1/4WL of wire. Many things can be gathered from observation of the current reported by EZNEC for the two antennas. The coil occupies roughly the same number of degrees of the antenna as the wire it replaces. The current at the top and bottom of the coil is roughly the same as the current at the two ends of the wire it replaces. Is the coil an exact replacement? Of course not. EZNEC says the current flowing into the bottom of the coil is 0.1168 amps and the current flowing out of the top of the coil is 0.748 amps. Say what? How can more current flow out of a coil than is flowing in? Aren't those two currents supposed to be equal? What gives? Some gurus have mistakenly treated the net current on a standing wave antenna as a lumped circuit current. The lumped circuit analysis falls apart in the presence of standing waves and the myth of equal net current in and out of a coil has been created as a result. Hint: A typical mobile antenna is a standing wave antenna and the net standing wave current reported by EZNEC doesn't much flow at all. It just, well, stands there like good little standing waves are supposed to. That standing wave pattern is illustrated in the graphic at: http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/qrzgif35.gif The two EZNEC files used to generate that graphic are available from me upon request. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Is the coil an exact replacement? Of course not. Just got an email that prompted me to expand this statement. The worst thing about replacing a piece of wire antenna with a coil is of course, the wire radiates well and the coil radiates hardly at all. But that's a compromise we are forced to live with for 75m mobile antennas. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, I will take the bait and demonstrate my ignorance:
EZNEC says the current flowing into the bottom of the coil is 0.1168 amps and the current flowing out of the top of the coil is 0.748 amps. Say what? How can more current flow out of a coil than is flowing in? Aren't those two currents supposed to be equal? What gives? I thought the power was constant, not the current. If that is the case, then IE must be constant and therefore the current must go up where the volts go down. I would appreciate the EZNEC copies because I learn easiest by examples and I am interested in how you put the comparison together. John Ferrell W8CCW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |