Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:43:00 -0400, Buck wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 06:17:35 -0700, Wes Stewart wrote: On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:08:46 -0400, Buck wrote: [snip] In other words, a 6 element beam of some given element spacing has a (number from the air) gain of 6db. A twelve element version with twice the boom length will be in the ballpark of 12 db gain. You want to rethink this? I've always figured 2.5 - 2.6 dB increase for each doubling of the boom length (or array size) for practical purposes. That's pretty close. I don't know the exact numbers and my numbers are just ballpark. yours may very well be more accurate. I haven't tried modeling for accuracy, just what I remember reading about antennas. If you build a 2 lambda antenna and a 4 lambda antenna, they the 4 will have about the same gain as a pair of 2 lambda antennas phased, which is about, but not necessarily exactly double the gain of one antenna. give or take 1/2 db, what is that to signal strength anyway? Quite a bit on an EME path. BTW, going from 6 dB to 12 dB isn't a two times increase. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
Ian, I have plotted the data in VE7BQH's table, along with a polynomial (1) curve fit and also the function given by K0TAR for comparison. The plot is at http://www.vk1od.net/lost/VE7BQHYagiGain.htm . It would be dangerous to assume the fit function applies much below the limits plotted. Owen -- Owen, I will try and dig out the original spreadsheet I used. It will be problematic to use, since it's not compatible with anything Microsoft, and there's nothing alse anymore. tom K0TAR |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 06:17:35 -0700, Wes Stewart
wrote: On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:08:46 -0400, Buck wrote: [snip] In other words, a 6 element beam of some given element spacing has a (number from the air) gain of 6db. A twelve element version with twice the boom length will be in the ballpark of 12 db gain. You want to rethink this? I've always figured 2.5 - 2.6 dB increase for each doubling of the boom length (or array size) for practical purposes. Wes, that is pretty consistent with the fit to the VE7BQH collation which gives me 2.64dB for doubling of the boom length (for a long yagi ( 2 - 8 wavelengths) with sufficient elements). Alternatively, 1dB increase for each 30% increase in boom length. Owen -- |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:31:10 -0700, Wes Stewart
wrote: On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:43:00 -0400, Buck wrote: On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 06:17:35 -0700, Wes Stewart wrote: On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:08:46 -0400, Buck wrote: [snip] In other words, a 6 element beam of some given element spacing has a (number from the air) gain of 6db. A twelve element version with twice the boom length will be in the ballpark of 12 db gain. You want to rethink this? I've always figured 2.5 - 2.6 dB increase for each doubling of the boom length (or array size) for practical purposes. That's pretty close. I don't know the exact numbers and my numbers are just ballpark. yours may very well be more accurate. I haven't tried modeling for accuracy, just what I remember reading about antennas. If you build a 2 lambda antenna and a 4 lambda antenna, they the 4 will have about the same gain as a pair of 2 lambda antennas phased, which is about, but not necessarily exactly double the gain of one antenna. give or take 1/2 db, what is that to signal strength anyway? Quite a bit on an EME path. BTW, going from 6 dB to 12 dB isn't a two times increase. you are right. A 6 element antenna to a twelve element antenna or double boom size is about 3 db gain, double power. Sorry. -- 73 for now Buck N4PGW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|