Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards" wrote in
: Error correction : They need be rotateable only through about 90 (ninety) degrees. This is to ensure an antenna can always be directed towards maximum signal even when there are 3 or 4 plastic guy ropes from the top of the loop which can prevent a complete rotation Rotation is probably not an option here as it has to sit on an apartment balcony. There will be some ground clutter, too, from the balcony railing. But that may not be as debilitating as it looks because the whole business is 10m up and any currents in the aluminum balcony railing tend to add to the radiation, though the pattern can become moot. -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 May 2006 23:26:10 GMT, Dave Oldridge
wrote: I did some modelling and the difference between 1/2 inch and 2 inch pipe is really only 6db and I can get nice flexible 1/2 inch pipe. Hi Dave, Only 6dB, hmmm? Considering the following: I'm thinking more on the lines of switching capacitors in and out. the switch contact resistance will probably swamp out any perceived efficiency gain achieved by added pipe diameter. You may be lucky and have them fuse themselves closed - luck could run the other way and they fuse open. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 May 2006 21:27:35 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote: On Fri, 12 May 2006 23:26:10 GMT, Dave Oldridge wrote: I did some modelling and the difference between 1/2 inch and 2 inch pipe is really only 6db and I can get nice flexible 1/2 inch pipe. Hi Dave, Only 6dB, hmmm? Considering the following: I'm thinking more on the lines of switching capacitors in and out. the switch contact resistance will probably swamp out any perceived efficiency gain achieved by added pipe diameter. You may be lucky and have them fuse themselves closed - luck could run the other way and they fuse open. Even if they don't fuse (gee Richard, its only ~100A RMS loop current at 10W EIRP (assuming Rr of about 0.001 ohms)... but it will be hard to achieve such high EIRP), it is some more loss resistance to drive efficiency even lower. I wondered about the effectiveness of the switching arrangement given the very narrow bandwidth of the antenna, it might take a hundred discrete tuning combinations to effectively cover the 80m / 75m band. Owen -- |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Effective Height of Vertical Antenna | Antenna | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
Antenna height vs roof height | Antenna | |||
Some help with Dipole Height | Antenna | |||
US MW STATIONS - FCC TOWER HEIGHT RULES | Shortwave |