Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want needinfo on the type of cores do I need to use with RG58 and RG 214
to make a choke type BALUN at 2m. I am building a vertical dipole out of 1 inch al tubing. coax will pass through the bottom half othe dipole with the sheild fastend at the middle of the bottom piece and cneter conductor fastened to the top piece of al. Initial test indicate I have RF on the shield and need some decoupling. Winding the coax into a coil certainly helped but this has prevented me from placing the antenna in a fiberglass tube the way I had planned. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jimmie D" wrote:
I want needinfo on the type of cores do I need to use with RG58 and RG 214 to make a choke type BALUN at 2m. I am building a vertical dipole out of 1 inch al tubing. coax will pass through the bottom half othe dipole with the sheild fastend at the middle of the bottom piece and cneter conductor fastened to the top piece of al. Initial test indicate I have RF on the shield and need some decoupling. For single band operation, a simple decoupling stub or sleeve will probably work. This is discussed in the ARRL Antenna Book. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jimmie D wrote:
I want needinfo on the type of cores do I need to use with RG58 and RG 214 to make a choke type BALUN at 2m. I am building a vertical dipole out of 1 inch al tubing. coax will pass through the bottom half othe dipole with the sheild fastend at the middle of the bottom piece and cneter conductor fastened to the top piece of al. Initial test indicate I have RF on the shield and need some decoupling. Winding the coax into a coil certainly helped but this has prevented me from placing the antenna in a fiberglass tube the way I had planned. For the RG58, each Steward HFB143064-300 (sorry for the ridiculous link length): http://www.steward.com/web_part_no.a...=HFB143064-300 provides about 180 ohms choke impedance. Each slightly longer and in a lower frequency ferrite, 28B0591-200: http://www.steward.com/web_part_no.a...rt=28B0591-200 provides about 500 ohms choke impedance. For the RG214, each Steward HFB259128-100: http://www.steward.com/web_part_no.a...=HFB259128-100 provides about 120 ohms of choke impedance. Each 28B1020-100: http://www.steward.com/web_part_no.a...rt=28B1020-100 provides about 300 ohms of choke impedance. You will have to string these on the coax before terminating it. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Popelish wrote:
For the RG58, each Steward HFB143064-300 (sorry for the ridiculous link length): http://www.steward.com/web_part_no.a...20Board%20Leve l%20and%20Cable%20Core%20Products&family=Ferrite% 20Cores%20for%20Cables% 20-%20%20Wiring%20Harnesses%20-%20Connectors&product=High%20Frequency%20 Solid%20Ferrite%20Cores%20for%20Round%20Cables&pr ogroup=1.%20Round%20and %20Cylindrical%20Cores&part=HFB143064-300 provides about 180 ohms choke impedance. TinyURL.com is a great resource for condensing very long web links that might become broken in transit. You only need to copy-and-paste the long URL into their web page, and "TinyURL" does exactly what it says. The above example comes right down to: http://tinyurl.com/n6bt9 -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() How do you figure the lower "coaxial sleave" dimentions. My project is converting/cutting down a old model PD83 (Phelps Dodge brass skirt coaxial, aprox 50mHz) to 2 meters. And I did use the ferrite bead on the J pole to cancel out the RF on the coax, but do not know which core specs. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Will" wrote:
How do you figure the lower "coaxial sleave" dimentions. It's usually 1/4WL long. The theory is to turn that 1/4WL of feedline into a transmission line where the currents on the outside of the original shield are balanced by the inside shield on the sleeve which balances the antenna currents. It functions over a certain single bandwidth. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 18:29:11 GMT, "Cecil Moore"
wrote: .... What's with the HTML format Cecil? Owen -- |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Owen Duffy" wrote:
What's with the HTML format Cecil? I've switched over from Netscape to Outlook Express and have no idea what I am doing. I can't seem to get Outlook Express to compose anything in Courier fixed font. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message .net... "Jimmie D" wrote: I want needinfo on the type of cores do I need to use with RG58 and RG 214 to make a choke type BALUN at 2m. I am building a vertical dipole out of 1 inch al tubing. coax will pass through the bottom half othe dipole with the sheild fastend at the middle of the bottom piece and cneter conductor fastened to the top piece of al. Initial test indicate I have RF on the shield and need some decoupling. For single band operation, a simple decoupling stub or sleeve will probably work. This is discussed in the ARRL Antenna Book. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Would be difficult to incorporate into my design |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jimmie D" wrote in message . .. I want needinfo on the type of cores do I need to use with RG58 and RG 214 to make a choke type BALUN at 2m. I am building a vertical dipole out of 1 inch al tubing. coax will pass through the bottom half othe dipole with the sheild fastend at the middle of the bottom piece and cneter conductor fastened to the top piece of al. Initial test indicate I have RF on the shield and need some decoupling. Winding the coax into a coil certainly helped but this has prevented me from placing the antenna in a fiberglass tube the way I had planned. Thanks all, found what I was looking for at Wireman. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Program - Coaxial Choke | Antenna | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Boatanchors | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment | |||
New program - Coax Choke | Equipment |