Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to work out a design for a linear loaded off center fed vertical
dipole for 75M (perhaps will work multiband as well?) using linear loading in an "S" configuration, i.e: feedpoint I-----------------------------------()-------------I I I I----------------------------------I I------------I I I -----------------------------------I I------------- Which per my reading should let me design a 75M vertical that is only 60% of the length of a conventional radiator. A recent article in QST showed the successful use of 450 ohm ladder line with interwoven 3rd wire as a conveient way to build this sort od linearly loaded design. In attempting to model this design in EZNEC, I do not seem to get the loading effect and shorter length of the radiators to achieve resonance, nor do I get the feedpoint impedance lowering that is described for this sort of loading. I was hoping that the OCFD design would allow direct feed through a choke balun without having to deal with impedance transformations. with either an excessively low center feed impedance (with loading) or the typical ~200 feedpoint impedance and 4:1 balun required with the OCFD design at about 1/3 distance from one end. Any thoughts or prior experience to share? Steve KQ4WB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
sorry, the diagram came out mangled on the post. the idea is a derivative
of the construction used in "The K4VX linear loaded dipole for 7 MHz" QST, July 2002, pages 40-42. Thanks Steve On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:25:44 -0400, Steven R. Jones wrote: I want to work out a design for a linear loaded off center fed vertical dipole for 75M (perhaps will work multiband as well?) using linear loading in an "S" configuration, i.e: feedpoint I-----------------------------------()-------------I I I I----------------------------------I I------------I I I -----------------------------------I I------------- Which per my reading should let me design a 75M vertical that is only 60% of the length of a conventional radiator. A recent article in QST showed the successful use of 450 ohm ladder line with interwoven 3rd wire as a conveient way to build this sort od linearly loaded design. In attempting to model this design in EZNEC, I do not seem to get the loading effect and shorter length of the radiators to achieve resonance, nor do I get the feedpoint impedance lowering that is described for this sort of loading. I was hoping that the OCFD design would allow direct feed through a choke balun without having to deal with impedance transformations. with either an excessively low center feed impedance (with loading) or the typical ~200 feedpoint impedance and 4:1 balun required with the OCFD design at about 1/3 distance from one end. Any thoughts or prior experience to share? Steve KQ4WB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:25:44 -0400, "Steven R. Jones"
wrote: In attempting to model this design in EZNEC, I do not seem to get the loading effect and shorter length of the radiators to achieve resonance, nor do I get the feedpoint impedance lowering that is described for this sort of loading. Hi Steve, This may well be due to its inability to resonate as advertised. This is not an infrequent complaint. One compelling contradiction is seen in the description of the antenna as being 60% of the conventional length; and the illustration of the antenna built in thirds which would suggest it is 33% of conventional length. Simple errors such as this lead to massive failures in expectation. This leads us to the observation that if you can erect a 1/6th wavelength vertical, what do you stand to gain with this spaghetti design that would put it ahead so much further? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Current across the antenna loading coil - from scratch | Antenna | |||
Unequal dipole legs on shortened antenna | Antenna | |||
vertical dipole? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |