Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I prune the driven element on my 6m 3el quad for best
swr, do I have to do anything to the reflector or director? -- 73's de Ken KG0WX - Kadiddlehopper #11808, Flying Pigs #-1055, Grid EM17io, FT-857D, AL-84, Elecraft XG2, 4SQRP Tenna Dipper, Heath GD-1B |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
no
"Ken Bessler" wrote in message news:%Gyig.40099$4H.35436@dukeread03... If I prune the driven element on my 6m 3el quad for best swr, do I have to do anything to the reflector or director? -- 73's de Ken KG0WX - Kadiddlehopper #11808, Flying Pigs #-1055, Grid EM17io, FT-857D, AL-84, Elecraft XG2, 4SQRP Tenna Dipper, Heath GD-1B |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Bessler wrote:
If I prune the driven element on my 6m 3el quad for best swr, do I have to do anything to the reflector or director? For beams, the desired radiation pattern is usually more important than minimum SWR. Using EZNEC, I've seen a 4:1 SWR yield the desired pattern where at the minimum 1.5:1 SWR point the F:B ratio was terrible. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message . com... Ken Bessler wrote: If I prune the driven element on my 6m 3el quad for best swr, do I have to do anything to the reflector or director? For beams, the desired radiation pattern is usually more important than minimum SWR. Using EZNEC, I've seen a 4:1 SWR yield the desired pattern where at the minimum 1.5:1 SWR point the F:B ratio was terrible. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp I did model this antenna with EZNEC but I forgot to take into account the fact that the wire used is insulated. I think that screwed up the resulting antenna. Maybe? Would an insulating jacket reduce the VF of the wire? I've accounted for everything else, wire gauge/loss, ant height, type of ground, etc. Ken KG0WX |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Bessler" wrote in message news:O3Dig.40117$4H.36191@dukeread03... "Cecil Moore" wrote in message . com... Ken Bessler wrote: If I prune the driven element on my 6m 3el quad for best swr, do I have to do anything to the reflector or director? For beams, the desired radiation pattern is usually more important than minimum SWR. Using EZNEC, I've seen a 4:1 SWR yield the desired pattern where at the minimum 1.5:1 SWR point the F:B ratio was terrible. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp I did model this antenna with EZNEC but I forgot to take into account the fact that the wire used is insulated. I think that screwed up the resulting antenna. Maybe? Would an insulating jacket reduce the VF of the wire? I've accounted for everything else, wire gauge/loss, ant height, type of ground, etc. Ken KG0WX OK now I'm really starting to think I should prune my reflector and director - here's a quote from the ARRL Antenna Book 2003, page 12-4: "In practice, it has been found that the length around the loop should be approximately 3.5% greater than the self-resonant length if the element is a reflector, and about 3.0% shorter than the self-resonant length if the parasitic element is a director." I built my 6m quad with a 240.64" driven element which I had to trim 6" to get the SWR where I wanted it (low end of 50mhz). My reflector is 246.64" and my director is 233.41". Help? Do I trim or not? I have done some tests with the ant up and I'm noticing my F/B ratio is not as good as the EZNEC model predicted (30.62 db predicted, I'm seeing maybe 2-3db) Ken KG0WX Always learning...... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ken Bessler wrote: Help? Do I trim or not? I have done some tests with the ant up and I'm noticing my F/B ratio is not as good as the EZNEC model predicted (30.62 db predicted, I'm seeing maybe 2-3db) The Handbook means the self-resonant frequency with no other elements around. They do NOT mean compared to the size of the driven element. A driven element can move higher or lower in frequency as you add other elements, depending on the tuning of the other elements. I usually do all my F/B tuning first, and then SWR last. By the way, I HOPE you have a balun at the feedpoint. Without a balun at the feedpoint, the F/B can be seriously diminished. 73 Tom |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Ken Bessler wrote: Help? Do I trim or not? I have done some tests with the ant up and I'm noticing my F/B ratio is not as good as the EZNEC model predicted (30.62 db predicted, I'm seeing maybe 2-3db) The Handbook means the self-resonant frequency with no other elements around. They do NOT mean compared to the size of the driven element. A driven element can move higher or lower in frequency as you add other elements, depending on the tuning of the other elements. I usually do all my F/B tuning first, and then SWR last. By the way, I HOPE you have a balun at the feedpoint. Without a balun at the feedpoint, the F/B can be seriously diminished. 73 Tom I have about 8 turns of coax at the feedpoint. Is that good enough or do I need a 1:1 balun also? Thanks for the help! Ken KG0WX |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Bessler wrote:
I did model this antenna with EZNEC but I forgot to take into account the fact that the wire used is insulated. I think that screwed up the resulting antenna. Maybe? Would an insulating jacket reduce the VF of the wire? Yes, most of us have been bitten by that bug in our thinking. Exactly the same thing happened to me with "My Favorite Loop Antenna" on my web page. If I remember correctly, the insulated effect is around 3% on VF. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message . com... Ken Bessler wrote: I did model this antenna with EZNEC but I forgot to take into account the fact that the wire used is insulated. I think that screwed up the resulting antenna. Maybe? Would an insulating jacket reduce the VF of the wire? Yes, most of us have been bitten by that bug in our thinking. Exactly the same thing happened to me with "My Favorite Loop Antenna" on my web page. If I remember correctly, the insulated effect is around 3% on VF. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Thanks for the info, Cecil - I just got back in the shack from trimming all 3 elements. The SWR is now pretty close to what EZNEC predicted. I can't tell if I've got any pattern on SSB because 6 is wide open and full of contesters. There is a beacon 80 miles away that I'm hearing and I'll try to see what kind of pattern I have receiving that. Ken KG0WX |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|