Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 17th 06, 12:28 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
Skip Land
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ham Survey: How many Appliance Operator classes do we need after code goes away?

We have three classes now, Should we increase or decrease?


I'm thinking we can reduce the number to two license classes:

One class for VHF/UHF so those people can screw up the repeaters, and one
with a little harder test that adds HF privileges, for those that want to
screw things up world wide.

SL
  #2   Report Post  
Old June 17th 06, 12:34 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
Woody
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ham Survey: How many Appliance Operator classes do we need after code goes away?

Good God people... is everyone a bus driver or teacher??? [then again, the
mentality is that of students] What is with this troll-o-rama since school
ended????
Shouldn't you people be in Myrtle/Virginia beach or something??
sheesh.
rb


"Skip Land" wrote in message
k.net...
We have three classes now, Should we increase or decrease?


I'm thinking we can reduce the number to two license classes:

One class for VHF/UHF so those people can screw up the repeaters, and one
with a little harder test that adds HF privileges, for those that want to
screw things up world wide.

SL



  #3   Report Post  
Old June 17th 06, 01:53 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
Mustafa
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ham Survey: How many Appliance Operator classes do we need after code goes away?


"Skip Land" wrote in message
k.net...
We have three classes now, Should we increase or decrease?


I'm thinking we can reduce the number to two license classes:

One class for VHF/UHF so those people can screw up the repeaters, and one
with a little harder test that adds HF privileges, for those that want to
screw things up world wide.

SL


So which group are you in, 'cause I doubt you have the skills or
intelligence to build your own equipment...Mr appliance operator in denial.



  #4   Report Post  
Old June 17th 06, 05:36 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
Povertyhill
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ham Survey: How many Appliance Operator classes do we need after code goes away?

You can change your name that you are showing but you are still the poor
troll that just can't let go! Go play with your key or something! sheeez!
Still posting from the same IP group!


  #5   Report Post  
Old June 17th 06, 11:46 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
Zombie Wolf
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ham Survey: How many Appliance Operator classes do we need after code goes away?

ooooooh yeah, Barry O'Fuss-ass - those top posters ! they should be drawn
and quartered.

"Barry OGrady" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:34:04 GMT, "Woody"
wrote:

Good God people... is everyone a bus driver or teacher??? [then again, the
mentality is that of students] What is with this troll-o-rama since school
ended????
Shouldn't you people be in Myrtle/Virginia beach or something??
sheesh.


They certainly should not be top posting!

rb


"Skip Land" wrote in message
ink.net...
We have three classes now, Should we increase or decrease?


I'm thinking we can reduce the number to two license classes:

One class for VHF/UHF so those people can screw up the repeaters, and
one
with a little harder test that adds HF privileges, for those that want
to
screw things up world wide.

SL



Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og





  #6   Report Post  
Old June 18th 06, 12:39 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Win
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ham Survey: How many Appliance Operator classes do we need after code goes away?

For the sake of the troll... Back in the early 90s there may have
been some etiiqutte on the net, but not today. Top posting is
perfectly acceptable today. The first line is about all anyone reads
of this kind of crap, anyway.

And, these want-to be nurds that think they are hackers because they
can read a header are also full of crap. I suspect I was writing code
befoer many were born. Most could not hack me if I gave them my
password.

Give me a break.

Win, w0lz




  #7   Report Post  
Old June 18th 06, 12:47 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default one


Win wrote:
For the sake of the troll... Back in the early 90s there may have
been some etiiqutte on the net, but not today. Top posting is
perfectly acceptable today. The first line is about all anyone reads
of this kind of crap, anyway.

indeed in manay does any past the title

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] RHF Shortwave 0 January 5th 04 03:49 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 04:45 AM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 01:02 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 04:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017