Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I live in the top flat of a building with a flat roof about 24' (7.5M) x 21'
(6.5M) and 30' (9M) above ground. I need an 80M antenna to operate locally around the SE part of England. I have limitations on what I can erect. I thought of a horizontal loop about 3' (1M) above the roof, possibly with 90uH to 100uH in each of the two side legs to help it resonate on 80M. I'm not very good at modelling and could not work out how I enter a reactance across the feedpoint to balance out the large negative reactance there. The FFT plot with EZNEC looks promising. Can someone help me to work out how to feed this antenna and what reactance I should add at the feedpoint. I have some options segarding the feeder and ATU. I have an SGS SG-230 ATU which I could mount near the loop or an LDG Z-11 that I could mount near the transmitter with a balun (I have several from 1:1 to 16:1) and balanced feed to the antenna. My preferred feeder is 50 or 300 ohm balanced as they are easily concealed or alternatively coax feeder and balun at the antenna. Thanks for any help. Richard (Dick) G4BBH |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're only interested in 80m, get a good split stator loop tuning
capacitor and put it opposite the feedpoint in the loop. Make the loop out of the fattest conductor you can find. It'll basically be a big halo antenna for 80m. (maybe you could call it a magnetic loop.. i don't know if people ascribe a particular fraction of a wavelength limit on magnetic loop sizes)..You'll need a motor drive for the cap, because as modeled with 3/4" copper tubing and 3-j1200 ohms opposite the feedpoint, the 2:1 SWR bandwidth is about 15kHz. Radiation resistance is 1.85 ohms or something like that, so you'd need low loss connections for all the wires and a welded capacitor... if you do it all right, though, you'd have a good efficient radiator for local communications. Just a thought. I think this would give you better performance than trying to inductively load the legs. 73, Dan |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan
Remember that this has to be a 'stealth' antenna as I live dead center in the town with a lady councillor opposite, the town council office 75 yards away and town hall about 150 yards away. This rules out low loss copper pipe etc. Most of the small 'magnetic loop' antennas are intended for vertical use which would also stand out like a sore thumb here. The advantage of the wire loop is that many buildings here have wire around the roof to deter seagulls, that means my wire would not be conspicuous. When I modelled my 21' x 24' horizontal square loop with loading coils of about 90uH in each side leg I got a feed impedance of over 300 ohms but with -j5000 or thereabouts. The swr curved dipped nicely at 3.65 MHz to a manageable level if I used a 4:1 balun and 300 ohm line feed. I reasoned that as the natural loop resonance was between 20M band and 30M band I could link out the coils and operate those bands too, although that would means climbing up a ladder out of the rooflight rather more often than my old bones like. Richard (Dick) G4BBH |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ferrymanr wrote:
Dan Remember that this has to be a 'stealth' antenna as I live dead center in the town with a lady councillor opposite, the town council office 75 yards away and town hall about 150 yards away. This rules out low loss copper pipe etc. Most of the small 'magnetic loop' antennas are intended for vertical use which would also stand out like a sore thumb here. The advantage of the wire loop is that many buildings here have wire around the roof to deter seagulls, that means my wire would not be conspicuous. When I modelled my 21' x 24' horizontal square loop with loading coils of about 90uH in each side leg I got a feed impedance of over 300 ohms but with -j5000 or thereabouts. The swr curved dipped nicely at 3.65 MHz to a manageable level if I used a 4:1 balun and 300 ohm line feed. I reasoned that as the natural loop resonance was between 20M band and 30M band I could link out the coils and operate those bands too, although that would means climbing up a ladder out of the rooflight rather more often than my old bones like. Richard (Dick) G4BBH In 'G' land what is the concern regarding public officials and radio antennas? Here in W/K land public officials and radio antennas are not a concern. Public safety issues are a matter of local building codes. Private contracts, known as CC&Rs, are a problem. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ferrymanr wrote:
Remember that this has to be a 'stealth' antenna as I live dead center in the town with a lady councillor opposite, the town council office 75 yards away and town hall about 150 yards away. This rules out low loss copper pipe etc. Most of the small 'magnetic loop' antennas are intended for vertical use which would also stand out like a sore thumb here. It's surprising what can be done, with a bit of determination that you *are* going to get on the air. I know a ham who lives in a Listed building, which means he can hardly even paint a door without consulting the local Council's Conservation Officer. To make life interesting, he lives right next to the Council offices, and there's a perfect view into his backyard from the Conservation Officer's desk! Now that's what I'd call really living with restrictions... yet he has still found ways to get out well on 80m. (His antenna would be very unlikely to suit your situation, so there's no point in describing it in detail.) Always remember that you have rights too. With certain exceptions, most UK householders have the right to put up a garden shed without asking anybody's permission at all. A surprisingly large shed, too - with a pitched roof, the ridge could be up to 4 metres high. Check how that would apply to you. And then, if anyone objects to you using a 4m high vertical loop, ask them if they'd seriously prefer that you build a whole big shed around it? The advantage of the wire loop is that many buildings here have wire around the roof to deter seagulls, that means my wire would not be conspicuous. That would certainly be another option to explore; but whatever you do, be sure to make the best use of all your rights. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
ferrymanr wrote: Remember that this has to be a 'stealth' antenna as I live dead center in the town with a lady councillor opposite, the town council office 75 yards away and town hall about 150 yards away. This rules out low loss copper pipe etc. Most of the small 'magnetic loop' antennas are intended for vertical use which would also stand out like a sore thumb here. It's surprising what can be done, with a bit of determination that you *are* going to get on the air. I know a ham who lives in a Listed building, which means he can hardly even paint a door without consulting the local Council's Conservation Officer. To make life interesting, he lives right next to the Council offices, and there's a perfect view into his backyard from the Conservation Officer's desk! Now that's what I'd call really living with restrictions... yet he has still found ways to get out well on 80m. (His antenna would be very unlikely to suit your situation, so there's no point in describing it in detail.) Always remember that you have rights too. With certain exceptions, most UK householders have the right to put up a garden shed without asking anybody's permission at all. A surprisingly large shed, too - with a pitched roof, the ridge could be up to 4 metres high. Check how that would apply to you. And then, if anyone objects to you using a 4m high vertical loop, ask them if they'd seriously prefer that you build a whole big shed around it? The advantage of the wire loop is that many buildings here have wire around the roof to deter seagulls, that means my wire would not be conspicuous. That would certainly be another option to explore; but whatever you do, be sure to make the best use of all your rights. I would transmit on an efficient short vertical, and use a magnetic loop on Receive. For that matter any low noise receive antenna like a Flag or K9AY. I would also look at something like the Welbrooke Active loop. I wont get into the debate of "magnetic" and noise! Just go to Welbrookes web page and read some of the reviews from a EMC expert on noise and comparing the Welbrooke to 20,000 Dollar R&S EMC antennas E and H plane antennas. If W8JI and others can work DX on 160meters from an efficient mobile antenna, you should have no trouble getting out. There was a guy on 80 meters from the west coast K6MB who used to beat stations with dipoles in the 80 meter DX window with a coil loaded mobile antenna! Dont believe all the high angle low angle nonsense, the difference in real terms amounts to one deep fade. I would never feel at a disadvantage running a vertical versus a low dipole. There was a interesting article in QST by Some PA hams who used a R&S super resolution DF antenna and measured incoming arrival angles across Europe, oh how i would like to have one of those setups! They use cross loops too. Zen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|