ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:33:20 -0700, Jim Kelley
wrote:

Isn't the elimination of the rights of property owners more of a
Socialist ideal?

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Maybe. Socialism has to do with ownership, fascism has to do with
control. Obviously there can be some overlap.

A quote from dictionary.com:

"Fascism:

A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a
dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the
opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of
belligerent nationalism and racism."

Sounds like a Homeowners Association to me. :-)

Bill, W6WRT

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:33:44 -0700, Bill Turner
wrote:

"Fascism:

A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a
dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the
opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of
belligerent nationalism and racism."

Sounds like a Homeowners Association to me. :-)

Hi Bill,

Do they subscribe to "signing statements?"

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:45:06 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote:

Hi Bill,

Do they subscribe to "signing statements?"

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Who is "they" and what is a "signing statement"?

Bill, W6WRT

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:08:43 -0700, Bill Turner
wrote:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:45:06 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote:

Hi Bill,

Do they subscribe to "signing statements?"

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Who is "they" and what is a "signing statement"?

Hi Bill,

They: the Homeowners Association
signing statement: a Fascist rewriting of a contract already entered
into.

I can anticipate a "no" in response to my question, and as such the
Homeowners Association ceases to qualify for the current state of the
Fascist art.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Jim Kelley wrote:


Bill Turner wrote:


Move away from the Fascist Homeowners Association
and get in an area where people know enough to leave each other alone!

Isn't the elimination of the rights of property owners more of a
Socialist ideal? That characterization would be a bit more consistent
with the "climate" here in this state.


You would think, wouldn't ya? Yet I find both far left and far right to
be equally meddlesome. Just different tactics.


- Mike -

Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:08:43 -0700, Bill Turner
wrote:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:45:06 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote:

Hi Bill,

Do they subscribe to "signing statements?"

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Who is "they" and what is a "signing statement"?

Hi Bill,

They: the Homeowners Association
signing statement: a Fascist rewriting of a contract already entered
into.

I can anticipate a "no" in response to my question, and as such the
Homeowners Association ceases to qualify for the current state of the
Fascist art.

Of course they aren't fascists. What they are is meddlesome groups who
find great joy in uniformity and exercising control over a group.

The original intent of such groups was keeping Bubba from parking his
'68 Marlin on blocks in the front yard, or using a toilet as a flower
planter.

What they have evolved into is a way for nosy people to squawk about
anything they don't like and now since somebody somewhere doesn't like
everything about anything, you have to get the paint color of your crown
molding approved, and can't hang clothes on a wash line in the back
yard. You can't plant a veggie garden and the plants you can plant are
from an acceptable list.

And yet There is nothing evil in such matters. It's a free country, and
if some people feel more comfy by giving up some of that freedom so that
they can get 5 grand more when they sell the place and move into the
nursing home - and give the money to said home, then let 'em have at it.
There isn't any law against stupid.

-73 de Mike KB3EIA -

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 08:54:45 -0400, Michael Coslo
wrote:

You would think, wouldn't ya? Yet I find both far left and far right to
be equally meddlesome. Just different tactics.


- Mike -

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Amen, bro.

Bill, W6WRT

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:56:53 -0400, Michael Coslo
wrote:

Of course they aren't fascists. What they are is meddlesome groups who
find great joy in uniformity and exercising control over a group.

Hi Mike,

Sounds like we've discovered the last of the proto-neocon republicans
in their natural preserve for endangered species. Amusing to
contemplate that they share the same future prospects as the Spotted
Owl - courtesy of the social engineering bulldozers coming out of the
beltway. ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Do you know of any place in Southern California that doesn't have such
restrictions?

"Bill Turner" wrote in message
...
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:20:27 -0400, Michael Coslo
wrote:

Why on earth would anyone live in one of those places? And yes there
are alternatives. I live in a development that doesn't have that that
kind of insane meddling going on. I can have a tower even, as long as it
has enough room to fall down within my yard and not hit the neighbors.

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Couldn't agree more. Move away from the Fascist Homeowners Association
and get in an area where people know enough to leave each other alone!
Your blood pressure will go down, your enjoyment of life will go up
and you might live long enough to Work All Stations.

Ok, a tad exaggerated but you get the idea.

73, BIll W6WRT

Bob Agnew wrote:
Do you know of any place in Southern California that doesn't have such
restrictions?

One probably has to move away from the left coast. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp