Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in message
No doubt you were "prevented." They couldn't hear you! I would tend to believe this account. Small vertical antennas next to the ground with no radials, will be just a tad better than a dummy load on that band. MK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark
I do believe that where the feed point is will make all the difference in the world. A similar feed point up in the air but feeding colinear verticals even tho they may be truncated will blow that thought away! Regards Art "Mark Keith" wrote in message om... Richard Clark wrote in message No doubt you were "prevented." They couldn't hear you! I would tend to believe this account. Small vertical antennas next to the ground with no radials, will be just a tad better than a dummy load on that band. MK |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
" Art Unwin KB9MZ" wrote in message news:9LFJb.49578$I07.153955@attbi_s53...
Mark I do believe that where the feed point is will make all the difference in the world. A similar feed point up in the air but feeding colinear verticals even tho they may be truncated will blow that thought away! Regards Art I doubt it. I use fairly large antennas on that band and still don't come close to many of the "big strappers" on that band. I've got a full size inv L, about 45 ft vertical, and also a 42 ft top loaded vertical. The top loading consists of four 60 ft wires. Current up the vertical section is nearly constant on that antenna. I bet that simple antenna will truncate your short collinear verticals in any direction, and even it's nothing to really get excited about. MK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Measuring radiation resistance | Antenna | |||
RF radiation detector | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |