Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember reading about very substantial increases in lifetime for
tubes shrouded in black, heat-radiating shields. I have an early series R-390A, I don't care about keeping it pristine, and I want to introduce all the official service mods, + a few more aimed at improving reliability. Its tube shields are all unpainted. I am tempted to paint them black, using engine type heat resistant paint, but there are some unknowns. ___________________________________________ - Are "proper" black shields so due to black-anodization treatment or a paint layer? Are they blackened BOTH inside and outside? - Is engine paint appropriate? (Most types are said to improve heat radiation). - Should one paint shields both outside and inside sauf the electrical contact area? (I could e.g theorize that on the inside all transmission is by direct heat transfer through glass-metal and air-metal contact, not going to improve with a paint layer). Are "proper" shields blackened both inside and outside? - Would the same reasoning hold for at least the _top_ dustcover of a radio? ___________________________________________ To do a proper job I should first check for temperature changes at the tube surface in the bare/bare, bare inside / painted outside, and painted/painted cases, but I am sure there is some knowledge floating around about this, enough to skip the experimental bit. Hints, o brethren? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Sep 2006 03:38:00 -0700, SpamHog wrote in . com:
I remember reading about very substantial increases in lifetime for tubes shrouded in black, heat-radiating shields. I have an early series R-390A, I don't care about keeping it pristine, and I want to introduce all the official service mods, + a few more aimed at improving reliability. Its tube shields are all unpainted. I am tempted to paint them black, using engine type heat resistant paint, but there are some unknowns. ___________________________________________ - Are "proper" black shields so due to black-anodization treatment or a paint layer? Are they blackened BOTH inside and outside? - Is engine paint appropriate? (Most types are said to improve heat radiation). - Should one paint shields both outside and inside sauf the electrical contact area? (I could e.g theorize that on the inside all transmission is by direct heat transfer through glass-metal and air-metal contact, not going to improve with a paint layer). Are "proper" shields blackened both inside and outside? - Would the same reasoning hold for at least the _top_ dustcover of a radio? ___________________________________________ To do a proper job I should first check for temperature changes at the tube surface in the bare/bare, bare inside / painted outside, and painted/painted cases, but I am sure there is some knowledge floating around about this, enough to skip the experimental bit. Hints, o brethren? I _think_ I remember that the black is from anodizing, but I Could Be Wrong. The best tube shields are the IERC shields with the inner contact fingers to maximize heat transmission from the envelope to the shield. I Seem To Recall that The Fine Manual for the 390 and the 390A says to run with the dustcovers off where possible. Yep, I was right. In The Field and Depot Maintenance Technical Manual, TM_11-5820-358-35, I find this: 4. Checking Unpacked Equipment ... e. Remove the top and bottom dust covers by removing the 16 screws (TM 11-5820-358-10) and lockwashers that secure the covers to the main frame. f. Inspect the subchassis on the upper and lower decks of the receiver for' loose connectors, loose tube shields, and broken tubes as follows: ... (2) If the receiver is to be used in a fixed installation, remove the shields from all tubes (fig. 2 and 3) except V201 through V206, V505, and V701. (3) Unless extremely dusty conditions are expected, do not replace the dust covers. (4) Do not replace the dust covers if the receiver is to be installed in Cabinet CY- 979/URR or Cabinet CY-917/URR. So you may be able to save a fair amount on tube shields. A fan to cool the rig down also is A Very Good Idea. My humble opinion is that the bottom side of the 390A needs the fan more than the top does, as the heat tends to rise and get trapped underneath. -- Mike Andrews, W5EGO Tired old sysadmin |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although the finned heat shields are excellent at moving heat away from a
particular tube, they do not remove the heat from the cabinet. Heat still remains in the cabinet. The best long term solution is to remove the heat from the cabinet. Often, this involves a fan running at reduced speed (for the sake of noise). Some of the modern small computer fans would do wonders. That may require cutting holes in cabinets. Some people are not willing to do that. Little things can help. Reducing the line voltage fron 122 volts to 110 or 115 will reduce heat a bit.. Even a cabinet that encourages natural convection flow will help. Regarding the tube shields themselves, shiny material causes the heat to be reflected back to the tube. So, black inside and outside can help - even if painted. Having the black finned material between the shield and the tube can help. You can purchase an infrared heat sensor and measure the temperature of the tubes. Also measuring the temperature of the case will tell you if you are making progress. I have found that reducing the internal temperature of equipment that tends to run warm has greatly increased the reliability and reduced tube replacement to a minimum. 73, Colin K7FM |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
COLIN LAMB wrote:
Although the finned heat shields are excellent at moving heat away from a particular tube, they do not remove the heat from the cabinet. Heat still remains in the cabinet. The best long term solution is to remove the heat from the cabinet. Often, this involves a fan running at reduced speed (for the sake of noise). Some of the modern small computer fans would do wonders. That may require cutting holes in cabinets. Some people are not willing to do that. Little things can help. Reducing the line voltage fron 122 volts to 110 or 115 will reduce heat a bit.. Even a cabinet that encourages natural convection flow will help. Regarding the tube shields themselves, shiny material causes the heat to be reflected back to the tube. So, black inside and outside can help - even if painted. Having the black finned material between the shield and the tube can help. You can purchase an infrared heat sensor and measure the temperature of the tubes. Also measuring the temperature of the case will tell you if you are making progress. I have found that reducing the internal temperature of equipment that tends to run warm has greatly increased the reliability and reduced tube replacement to a minimum. 73, Colin K7FM The A number 1 thing to do to reduce the heat in a R390/390A is to turn off the ovens. -Chuck |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Often, this involves a fan running at reduced speed
Try wiring two "whisper" fans in series. Even quieter than a whisper :-) Common sense tells me that anything which moves air over the chassis will be much more effective than some marginal change in the covering of tube shields. Phil Nelson |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you guys!
Colin: Heat still remains in the cabinet. True.I find rather amazing how many old design types, esp. for consumer tube gear, were oblivious to heat. I think ppl had a "machinery" or "engine" paradigm in mind. If stove and charcoal iron are hot, why not a radio? WRT boatanchors, I always tried to improve ventilation, with a suspicion that in so doing I might move frequency-defining parts off the expected temperature range, but the '390 seems to me quite well temperature compensated. When Collins folks were designing this, bitter cold in Korea must have been a fresh memory. Right now that radio is coverless, perched mid-air on a rack-on-wheels. I run a room fan aimed at it, and the difference in temperature is very remarkable. The previous owner, I2FZX (sk) used it for decades with covers on, sitting almost directly on a surface, with an HRO-500 right on top, and never had problems with it. Maybe the HRO did. Longer term, I plan to put it in a desktop wooden cabinet, stacked with some SSB/synchro-AM device and a speaker (and a thermometer??), with plenty of forced airflow. I am considering flowing air from the bottom - out the lower side holes - into the upper side holes - out the top - sucked out the back by a bank of slowed-down, underfed 120mm fans. I also want to do the ss-rectifier mod, and introduce a NTC resistor for inrush current limiting, both of which will cut heat. _____ Back to the original question, I'll do some experiments with engine paint and a meat thermometer. If it's good for telling if meat is cooked, it may help avoid cooking tubes. :-) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() SpamHog wrote: I remember reading about very substantial increases in lifetime for tubes shrouded in black, heat-radiating shields. That may be true for tubes that run really hot, but most of the tubes in a R-390A are running at modest power levels, except maybe for the rectifier tubes and the audio output tubes. They're all running at well under 100 degrees C, cool enough to touch. That's many many multiples of 10 degrees C away from their limit. So I wouldnt worry about it. I have an early series R-390A, I don't care about keeping it pristine, and I want to introduce all the official service mods, + a few more aimed at improving reliability. Its tube shields are all unpainted. I am tempted to paint them black, using engine type heat resistant paint, but there are some unknowns. ___________________________________________ - Are "proper" black shields so due to black-anodization treatment or a paint layer? Are they blackened BOTH inside and outside? - Is engine paint appropriate? (Most types are said to improve heat radiation). - Should one paint shields both outside and inside sauf the electrical contact area? (I could e.g theorize that on the inside all transmission is by direct heat transfer through glass-metal and air-metal contact, not going to improve with a paint layer). Are "proper" shields blackened both inside and outside? - Would the same reasoning hold for at least the _top_ dustcover of a radio? ___________________________________________ To do a proper job I should first check for temperature changes at the tube surface in the bare/bare, bare inside / painted outside, and painted/painted cases, but I am sure there is some knowledge floating around about this, enough to skip the experimental bit. Hints, o brethren? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: 36 tube sockets & 39 tube shields from R-390A | Equipment | |||
FA: 36 tube sockets & 39 tube shields from R-390A | CB | |||
FA: 36 tube sockets & 39 tube shields from R-390A | Shortwave | |||
"Pebble-Grain Black" Cabinet Paint: Still Available? | Boatanchors |