Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:13:02 -0400, Jon Teske
wrote: I stand corrected: according to http://www.radioing.com/museum/tx4.html, the Ranger II was made from 1961 to 1965. I didn't know the class D citizen's band was that old. William The Citizen Radio Service began in 1947, and the first Class D Citizen Band licenses were issued on September 11, 1958. Not sure when they were discontinued. There was some sort of Citizens service throughout the 50's as you say, but it wasn't on 11 meters, or at least not on what had been the 11 meter ham band. That's true. The original Citizen Band prior to the one we know today was on 460 to 470 Mhz, and there were two licenses. A and B. The problem with that was that there was very little equipment that could operate at those frequencies. That was when the FCC took the 11-meter band away from the amateur radio operators and started the 11-meter Citizen Band with the Class D license in 1958. Dick - W6CCD -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoffrey S. Mendelson ) writes:
Actually CB was quite popular by the late 1960's The sunspot peak of 1968-69 helped a lot. The band was pretty dead (thankfully) due to low MUF during the early 1960s. .... Martin VE3OAT |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Potter wrote:
The sunspot peak of 1968-69 helped a lot. The band was pretty dead (thankfully) due to low MUF during the early 1960s. When I said popular, I was refering to the operation within the U.S. law (which was and is very different than the rest of the world) which prohibits "skip" operation. Most of the useage at that time was still families keeping in touch, aid to motorists, etc. Almost overnight during the truker's strike it became the home of what seems like a bunch of 12 year old's with walkie-talkies. At one time there was a reasonable license fee (about $10 a year). Then the FCC raised it to $25 to help keep usage low. Someone sued complaining that it was unreasonable and won. The FCC then started issuing free licenses as compensation for their overcharging. Then they started allowing temporary call signs ("K" your initials and your zip code) so mine would have been at the time "KGSM19120", I even had a license with a real call sign, but I've long since lost it and forgoten the call. I wonder if there are CB callbooks from the 1970's and 1980s? I'm no longer in the U.S. anyway but I believe if you were issued a call, you can still use it if you want to. Eventually, it became too much trouble and expense to issue free licenses to people who never used them anyway, so they issued a blanket license to anyone on U.S. soil. Possibly someone else can fill in the exact time line. As for outside of the U.S. it still flourishes as a no-code no-test amateur radio service. In the E.U., there are few restrictions on what you can do, including less limitations on transmitters, FM, and packet operation. There are even a few European websites devoted to using CB to "improve the radio art" e.g. experimental antennas. The U.K. had a 927 mHz CB service which was canceled when the frequencies were assigned to GSM cell phones. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 Fax ONLY: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: Martin Potter wrote: The sunspot peak of 1968-69 helped a lot. The band was pretty dead (thankfully) due to low MUF during the early 1960s. When I said popular, I was refering to the operation within the U.S. law (which was and is very different than the rest of the world) which prohibits "skip" operation. Not at all. It just mandates a certain power input to the finals. During REALLY GOOD conditions, 4 watts will get you plenty of skip. I don't remember 1968, but I remember 6 meter cross-country stuff with milliwatt CW outputs in 1979. And the NEXT cycle coming up is going to be even better. Note that Class D wasn't all there was. There was Class C which allowed pulse modulation in the 26 MHz range for remote control, and Class A citizens band which was AM in the 450 MHz range. I don't recall what Class B was. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Not at all. It just mandates a certain power input to the finals. At one time it DID mandate something like "local communications only". I can't remember the exact wording, so I leave it in quotes. Note that Class D wasn't all there was. There was Class C which allowed pulse modulation in the 26 MHz range for remote control, and Class A citizens band which was AM in the 450 MHz range. I don't recall what Class B was. I had a class C and D license. The difference was ticking a box on the application. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 Fax ONLY: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:26:01 -0400, Jon Teske
wrote: Since I never operated CB except for one short contact in my carpool mate's car to show him how it worked, I was not intimately familiar with CB rules. I seem to remember thought that there were regulation which prohibited even attempting to make a contact of over 200 miles (or so) even if conditions permitted this. I seem to remember that this was one of the ways to attempt to rein in the use of powerful amplifiers that many CBers used (of course the prohibition of the sale of amps capable of operation in that range, including those intended for ham use, was another FCC mandate.) Anyone know more about that? FCC rules 95.412(9) prohibit communications or attempts at communication with stations more than 250 km or 155.3 miles away. Dick - W6CCD I don't know the licensing requirements, but I think that there is also a frequency or frequencies at 72 MHZ available for radio control of models in addition to 26MHz; and, 50 MHz if one is a licensed amateur. Anyone up on that? Jon W3JT -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:21:29 -0700, Dick wrote:
FCC rules 95.412(9) prohibit communications or attempts at communication with stations more than 250 km or 155.3 miles away. Is that still in effect? The rule died here in .ca with the license requirement. That was what, around 20 years ago? __ Gregg |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:01:37 -0700, geek
wrote: On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:21:29 -0700, Dick wrote: FCC rules 95.412(9) prohibit communications or attempts at communication with stations more than 250 km or 155.3 miles away. Is that still in effect? The rule died here in .ca with the license requirement. That was what, around 20 years ago? __ Gregg That was taken from the latest Part 95 posted on the FCC website. So yes, it is still in effect in the U.S. Dick - W6CCD -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The rule died here in .ca with the license requirement. That was what,
around 20 years ago? Except for communicating with other stations on any channel and having to use a call sign, most of the original rules are still in effect, ie. no high power, no talking over 150 miles, etc. Now they say the blanket license covers all legally operating stations. If you're operating illegally then it's considered to be operating without a license. Fine, $10,000 per day, per offense. Ron |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Date of manufacture for CB radio | CB | |||
Date of manufacture for CB radio | Policy | |||
Johnson Ranger | Equipment | |||
Johnson Ranger | Equipment | |||
FS: E.F. Johnson Ranger | Boatanchors |