Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, all.
I thought I would anchor the the known (by me) history of my BC348R receiver... and share it with any interested parties in this group. Any updates and/or corrections will be gratefully received. Warning: long post...! Cheers Roger __________________________________ A BC348R history "We are only the temporary custodians of our collectibles..." Anon. Early history 1943: RC348R S/N 16743 was built by Belmont Radio under a large contract with the US Army Air-force. It was delivered to the San Antonio air-force base and likely installed in a B-series bomber (B24, B25, B26... no information on this.) Subsequently, S/N 16743 may have flown thousands of hours in WW2 to who knows where... Britain, Germany, China, Pacific islands campaign? We know it was not the Doolittle raid or it would be scratched up a bit! 1945: Continued US service in peace and local wars... could have been anywhere... Europe, Asia, Korea, US home front? Whatever happened to that aircraft and her crews, S/N 16743 survived without a scratch. 1960's (speculation) Aircraft was decommissioned and S/N 16743 put in storage or sold surplus to, I suspect, someone in aviation or avionics. It was used in receive-only mode at some point since the power socket jumpered where the "mute-receive/transmit" switch is wired. Some time afterwards it was taken to the town of Shawinigan, Quebec, Canada. My history Early 1970's: I got his unit in the early 1970's. I lived in Montreal and had recently got my private pilots licence. My air transport pilot friend, John Ainsworth, said there was a couple of surplus "aircraft radios" in an FBO's office at the Shawinigan airport, that we could buy "as is". He closed the deal at CDN$50 for them both (almost the same as US$50 back then.) I flew John up in a Cherokee PA-28-140 to pick them up (still have the logbook entry.) They were both "R" models and were alleged to have come out of decommissioned US Army Air-force B25's or B26's, but I have forgotten the details. We put them in the back seats of the Cherokee (checked the weight and balance!) and flew back to Montreal. John took one and I took the other, SN16743. I have no idea what happened to John's BC348 and since then we have lost touch. Mid 1970's For a while my unit was a static display, I was too busy to look into getting it working. A year or so later I got around to restoration - it did not seem to need much visually. Everything was there, including the dynamotor. Someone had bridged pins 2 and 6 of the power plug so it had been at least tried out on receiver-only mode, i.e. no transmitter hooked up. Of course, I needed a 28 VDC power supply so I built one... but not very well, I'm afraid! I built a regulated P/S using a series regulator transistor (a T-03 based OC28, IIRC) and a zener diode in the classical circuit after a transformer and FW rectifier. I made two mistakes, one easy to fix the other nearly fatal. The easy one: the base current of the OC28 at full load was too high for the zener, so I added an extra transistor as a current amplifier (IIRC, as an emitter follower after the zener.) Problem solved. The second, and more serious, mistake was using a power transfomer with too high a secondary voltage. I had purchased a 250 VA Hammond transformer that had a 40 VAC secondary with the notion of having enough volts to drop across the series regulator transistor. Of course, there were too many volts and it got too hot! (it had a decent heat sink, too.) I tried various work arounds, e.g. using choke input (but I did not have the right choke, it was too small), and series resistors ahead of the regulator - but they got too hot. Finally, I put a separate wirewound resistor in the 120 VAC lead to the MT and adjusted it so that only 3 volts or so was dropped across the OC28 at about 1.5 amps... about 4.5 watts in the OC28. It worked but was a nasty kluge to my mind. I actually put the ww resistor in a separate porcelain jam jar away from the chasis, always meaning to put it on posts top-side later.... never got around to it. Anyway, we got power! Back to the radio... I took it down to our then country place near Magog, Quebec, planning to put up a decent SW antenna... in the meantime I strung a longish wire out of the window to a nearby pine tree. Radio worked on all bands but the dynamotor was quite noisy so I did not listen much. Then I got distracted from the project and the BC348 stayed unused for over 15 years... 1999: Fast forward forward. We wanted to divest ourselves of property in a potentially "separatist Quebec" and get out (should have done this in 1976, or at least in the 1980's... never mind!) We sold the country place and stored the radio in our Montreal townhouse. In 1999 my wife and I moved to Thornhill, north of Toronto (what a relief!), since I had been offered a great job as VP Engineering with a company in North York (Toronto) just south of the 401. Radio was moved, of course, along with tons of other stuff, but that's another story. Put the BC348 in storage again. 2007: Eight years went by and I spent time on other things, including my engineering work, restoring commercial tube radios, building tube amplfiers, skeet shooting and relearning the piano. Circa 2007 the BC348 at last got onto my "do list" as "test tubes and refurbish". In the Spring of 2007 I actually did something about it! I had already searched out manuals and schematics on the 'net, so the first task was to test all the tubes. All tested "good" to "very good". Then, fix that bloody P/S! The regulator was not needed. The BC348 takes a nearly fixed current of about 1.25 amps at 28 VDC so a choke input P/S properly designed would do the job. Fortunately, I now had the right choke to hand so I simply gutted the old P/S and brewed up a simple unregulated unit. It worked fine with very minor fixed resistor voltage correction. Now to the radio... It was, of course still working. I used a matching transformer from the 300 ohm "Low" phones output to an 8 ohm loudspeaker but the sound quality was very bad and power very low (designed for phones.) To keep the radio original, I fitted a small commercial radio OPT (6550 ohms to 4 ohms) into the chassis (not much room, you have to be very creative with space.) Using a spare 6 ohm LS this matched the 6K6GT o/ p tube quite well. The old OPT was left in, of course, for future change back to original. I wired the 4 ohm secondary to the jack sockets to one of the original phone jacks so that I could plug in a 4 to 6 ohm speaker. It all worked perfectly, lots of audio power now, around 2 watts. Now for the important part... I wanted to bypass the dynamotor so that it would not wear out - it was too noisy anyway. But I did not want to remove it from the chassis as it could get lost over the next 200 plus years... (This note will be kept with the radio, inside the chassis.) I disconnected the 5 dynamotor leads from the dynamotor terminal strip and connected them to a new 4 terminal strip (one point is common), carefully mounted under the chassis near the dynamotor - there's not much room, I used standoffs and two new holes (allowed!) I connected this terminal strip to a 4 wire cable to the external P/S's. This cable is actually a 3 wire plus insulated shield cable (shield, red, black and white.) Red goes to what was dynamotor B+; black goes to what was dynamotor B minus (NOT chasssis, it's NOT the same - check the schematic, you "smell a rat" when you see the 6K6 cathode is connected to ground); shield goes to chassis and white goes to pin 2 of the 6K6 output tube (NOT to the old 28 VDC + as there is a resistor ("76-A") that drops the 28 volts to 25.2 VDC for the series parallel tube heaters. For the B+ I used a Heathkit regulated power supply set to 200 VDC (up to 220 is OK.) The heaters are in series-parallel across the 28 VCD supply with resistor "76-A" to drop 2.8 volts and another one to even out the 6K6 heater's 0.4 amps and the other tubes' 0.3 amps. PIn 2 of the 6K6 is at 25.2 volts above chassis so I used a 24 VAC HVAC control transformer to run the heaters - AC is fine for this, no hum at all. That's about it to date., No alignment done - it seems good enough for now. No paper caps replaced yet as all voltages across them are normal. It receives on all bands but I don't have an outside antenna (no space.) I plan to take it over to a ham friend's house shortly and try it on his 160 foot "long" wire to see what it will do. So, some more history has been preserved for posterity... It's an honour to own... correction: to have temporary custody, of an original piece of equipment used by those brave men of the US Army Airforce in WW2... somewhere under the atmospherics of today's SW stations your can just hear the faint echo of those big Wright-Cyclone radial engines, the bursting of flak and the roar of twin 1/2 inch Brownings... Roger Jones August 2007 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great History - enjoyed the read.
I fllew radio op in Navy Super Constellations in the mid 50's -- we had a BC348 at the Radio Op position. On off duty hours I would listen to stations all over the Pacific on the shop BC-348. Thanks for the memories (as Bob Hope sed) Lamont "Engineer" wrote in message s.com... Hi, all. I thought I would anchor the the known (by me) history of my BC348R receiver... and share it with any interested parties in this group. Any updates and/or corrections will be gratefully received. Warning: long post...! Cheers Roger SNIP |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I cannot speak for all cases, certainly, but I understand that the
aircraft factories did the original installations of radio equipment during the final phases of airframe construction, to include the cable runs and antennas. I have some drawing copies from Consolidated that show the placement of the BC-348, BC-375, direction finder (MN-26?), interphone, control boxes, etc., and to include the associated cable requirements and antennas within B-24 aircraft that they were manufacturing, at the time. Also, when the aircraft were ferried from the various factory locations to the designated military airdrome, the radio equipment was operational. That is not to say that equipment was not installed by the military.. to the contrary, especially when things were upgraded, etc. As an aside, I also have a technical tome that seems to indicate that Norden bombsights (the sight unit itself) were installed by the military under some sort of an umbrella of security. As a collector and user of a BC-348N and an R, used with an ATC-1 and a BC-375, I appreciate the history of these receivers and would be curious about the actual lineage of my units. I know one of mine was apparently never put into service by the AAF. Rather, it was sold at surplus, NIB, by Radio Shack in 1948. I have the original receipt, found inside the cabinet, as bought from the original owner's family in 1999. My other unit was obviously "used". I really don't have a clue as to how many truly "combat-operational" sets made it to the surplus market. I suspect most were decommissioned along with the associated airframes. I think this is why there are so few rack mounts for many aircraft sets vs. the number of radios. Try and find a rack for an ART-13! It took me 15 years to find the actual aircraft rack (not to be confused with TCZ ground version mounting). Finally, I'll add a tech suggestion. Some BC-348 versions have a gain-leveling pot, mechanically attached to one end of the tuning capacitor shaft. Its supposed to keep the receiver gain level over the tuning range of each band. You can get just a bit more gain by bypassing this pot. If the pot is going bad, it can help a lot to bypass it, of course! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 17, 7:17 pm, K3HVG wrote:
(snip) Finally, I'll add a tech suggestion. Some BC-348 versions have a gain-leveling pot, mechanically attached to one end of the tuning capacitor shaft. Its supposed to keep the receiver gain level over the tuning range of each band. You can get just a bit more gain by bypassing this pot. If the pot is going bad, it can help a lot to bypass it, of course! Thanks, good info... IIRC, mine has that pot but it's packed away at the moment so I'll check next time I use it. By-passing it sounds a good idea (but leaving it there with a note!) Cheers, Roger |