I also suspect a ground loop, although a ground loop is more common in a
mobile installation. The common mode modulation is also common in direct
conversion and regen receivers. In those cases, it is solved by rf chokes
in the power supply circuit, isolating the power lines from any rf getting
back into the power supply. Hopefully, there is no real problem, but if
there is, isolate the power line from rf - perhaps both on the receiver and
transmitter.

And, it seems kind of early to check the equipment out for Field Day, isn't
it? That is something you are supposed to start Friday night and then have
to stay up all night to fix it, so you can start Field Day bleary eyed.
Seems almost unfair to check this stuff out now.

73, Colin K7FM

Me agn Dave!!

The other model is an SB-614 (I have two) and it works better. For
a C note it's a good deal and if you're gonna do a bunch of transmitter
resto work, it's the ticket

Kim W8ZV
wrote in message
...
On Jun 22, 4:07 pm, "Kim Herron" wrote:
Hi Dave.

Over the years I too have run into the same situation and what the
fellows here are telling you is most likely correct. I can also tell
you the you don't need any antenna to pick up that transmitter when
it's
that close. In fact you'll do better if you don't use an antenna or
something very short to get a better picture of what your xmtr sounds
like. This is one time where an RF envelope monitor scope comes in
REAL
handy. If you have hum on the transmitted envelope you'll see it on
the
scope.
Kim W8ZV

Thanks, Kim. As recommended by another poster, I think the best
course of action is to use an external antenna and make a few contacts
to get signal reports.

You’re right about the monitor scope. There’s a companion Heakthkit
SB-610 Monitor Scope that I don’t have, but could use right now.

-Dave Drumheller, K3WQ

Hi Gang!

Yup, run into groundloops too. But that usually only occurs when
more than one piece of gear is plugged into more than one side of an
electrical service (3 phase) and an electrical imbalance is present.
Now an open or poor ground is different. However that would create a
LARGE increase in hum and probably would result in a very poor audio
signal received, probably not understandable as close as Dave is to the
receiver with the transmitter. His mic, however will pick up some noise
from his hand picking up the mic, even when it's properly grounded and
shielded. What we have no way to tell is what that hum sounds like and
how loud it is in relation to the actual signal. Most likely, it's
proximity effect as suggested to begin with. I have had some AM
transmitters (Johnson and Heath) that suffered from inadequate power
supply filtering, but even that wasn't really noticeable to a station
even 5 miles away. Extra filtering took care of a lot of it, but it was
still there on a receiver 10 feet away with no antenna.
One thing that wasn't mentioned was the possibility that one of
the cables that interconnect the two pieces of gear, if he has them
cabled up to work as a transceiver COULD have an open shield and that
could account for some introduced hum that gets louder with the audio,
since this is a heterodyne type transmitter, and not a phasing rig.

Kim W8ZV
wrote in message
...
On Jun 22, 3:37 pm, wrote:
On Jun 22, 4:07 pm, "Kim Herron" wrote:

Hi Dave.

Over the years I too have run into the same situation and what the
fellows here are telling you is most likely correct. I can also tell
you the you don't need any antenna to pick up that transmitter when
it's
that close. In fact you'll do better if you don't use an antenna or
something very short to get a better picture of what your xmtr
sounds
like. This is one time where an RF envelope monitor scope comes in
REAL
handy. If you have hum on the transmitted envelope you'll see it on
the
scope.
Kim W8ZV

Thanks, Kim. As recommended by another poster, I think the best
course of action is to use an external antenna and make a few contacts
to get signal reports.

You’re right about the monitor scope. There’s a companion Heakthkit
SB-610 Monitor Scope that I don’t have, but could use right now.

-Dave Drumheller, K3WQ

You mentioned that when you plug in the mic it changes the hum
level,,This may sound too simple,, BUT,,Always bond all items together
(Rec,xmtr,spkr,etc)and to a good earth ground.They used to call it
GROUND LOOPS, I never figured exactly what a groundloop is ,,I do
understand grounding and I hope you have done that first..OK W4PQW
PS (I think a groundloop is when you deliberately wreck your
airplane at the end of the runway just before you kill yourself..)

On Jun 22, 9:49 pm, "Kim Herron" wrote:
One thing that wasn't mentioned was the possibility that one of
the cables that interconnect the two pieces of gear, if he has them
cabled up to work as a transceiver COULD have an open shield and that
could account for some introduced hum that gets louder with the audio,
since this is a heterodyne type transmitter, and not a phasing rig.

Good idea. I’ll check this tonight. Thanks, Kim.

On Jun 22, 9:14 pm, "COLIN LAMB" wrote:
And, it seems kind of early to check the equipment out for Field Day, isn't
it? That is something you are supposed to start Friday night and then have
to stay up all night to fix it, so you can start Field Day bleary eyed.
Seems almost unfair to check this stuff out now.

I know, I know. Please forgive me.

-Dave Drumheller, K3WQ

In article
,
wrote:

I¹ve finished refurbishing a Heathkit SB-401 transmitter, but have one
last problem to fix: 60 Hz tunable hum audible on the output. (Hum
modulates the audio.)

David-

When I saw the word, "tunable", the first thing that popped into my mind
was "parasitic oscillation"!

You might recheck neutralization of the rig's finals. The manual
probably covers it. One thing to check, is to see if the plate current
dip corresponds to peak power output.

Fred
K4DII

One of the things that I forgot to mention is the fact that Heath rigs
like (read engineering requirement buried in one of the manuals) to use
RG-62 cable to interconnect them. That cable is 93 ohm coax and they
really like to all be the same length (memory is returning from antique
radio resto). I ran into something like this back many years ago when I
ran this same set of rigs. One more thing to look at is the 6D10 that
is in the 401. They can develop heater to cathode shorts and the same
thing will happen.
I might suggest a Collins test to check whether you really have a
problem or not. Tune up the rig following the book procedure for full
output. What you're using is the unbalanced modulator in Upper sideband
to create output. Then, without touching anything,
disconnect the mic and ground the pin that actuates the transmitter,
watch the plate and grid current to see if any actual drive exists, and
them listen to it on another receiver. You ground the mic connector pin
with something really short to the case. If your carrier is WAY down
and is fairly clean, and its gets hummy, dirty with the mic connected,
it's your mic or cable. If there is only a small amount of hum there,
when the mic is connected, you probably don't have a problem, you just
haven't done this particular type of thing before and you are, like my
Golden Retriever, chasing your tail.

Kim W8ZV


"Fred McKenzie" wrote in message
...
In article
,
wrote:

I¹ve finished refurbishing a Heathkit SB-401 transmitter, but have
one
last problem to fix: 60 Hz tunable hum audible on the output. (Hum
modulates the audio.)

David-

When I saw the word, "tunable", the first thing that popped into my
mind
was "parasitic oscillation"!

You might recheck neutralization of the rig's finals. The manual
probably covers it. One thing to check, is to see if the plate
current
dip corresponds to peak power output.

Fred
K4DII

Well, I solved the problem. It was feedback due to close proximity of
the transmitter and receiver, just as Chuck, Tio and Kim suggested.

Tio recommended an on-the-air check, and that’s what I did. I erected
a makeshift 80-meter antenna in the backyard--good practice for Field
Day--and called CQ. A station in New York replied. He reported that
my audio was fine, with no hum modulation.

What a relief! Thanks again for all the suggestions.

-Dave Drumheller, K3WQ