Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is the question:
Would you swap a Drake r8b for a Collins 51 S1? Why do I ask this? I have a Drake R8B and a Wellbrook 1530+ antenna, and pick up a lot ot QRM and noise S5 - 6 so I cannot do DX, I have tried with other antennas and the result is the same. I have read in other forums that receivers with valvel are less noiser and one owner of the Collins 51 s1 says that QRM and noises do not exist. Do you think that it is worth swapping it? Thanks. Any comments are very welcomed |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "carlos2007" wrote in message ... This is the question: Would you swap a Drake r8b for a Collins 51 S1? Why do I ask this? I have a Drake R8B and a Wellbrook 1530+ antenna, and pick up a lot ot QRM and noise S5 - 6 so I cannot do DX, I have tried with other antennas and the result is the same. I have read in other forums that receivers with valvel are less noiser and one owner of the Collins 51 s1 says that QRM and noises do not exist. Do you think that it is worth swapping it? Thanks. Any comments are very welcomed Internally generated noise and noise that comes in the antenna lead from external sources are two very different things. Both are nice receivers, but the 51S1, while collectable and pricey, isn't a stellar performer when it comes to strong signal handling. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, carlos2007 wrote:
This is the question: Would you swap a Drake r8b for a Collins 51 S1? Why do I ask this? I have a Drake R8B and a Wellbrook 1530+ antenna, and pick up a lot ot QRM and noise S5 - 6 so I cannot do DX, I have tried with other antennas and the result is the same. I have read in other forums that receivers with valvel are less noiser and one owner of the Collins 51 s1 says that QRM and noises do not exist. You're misinterpreting the comments. Your problem is noise that's coming in the antenna, and the receiver won't do a thing about that. Even thirty years ago, there wasn't much around the average house that generated noise. But now, just about everything is computerized or digitized, and it all generates noise. All those switching supplies too, they generate noise, in some cases even with the equipment turned off. So the radio spectrum is far noisier now than in the old days. The only places that won't suffer will be out in the country, where there are few people to have electronic equipment around that generates all that noise. The noise generated in a receiver may or may not be an issue, unrelated to this external noise problem. The noise figure of a receiver becomes increasingly significant as you go up in frequency, while on the shortwave bands it means relatively little since the "noise" generated by the sun and such are less significant at the lower frequencies. Many shortwave receivers had quite large noise figures, 8dB or so, and it never mattered, while that sort of noise figure in the VHF range would be considered awful; you'd want 2dB or so up there. One confusing thing is that a cheap receiver with little gain appears to be "less noisy" than a good receiver with lots of gain. To the beginner, the noise coming out of a good speaker sounds bad, but it's not. My first receiver, a Hallicrafter's S-120A (the transistorized one) had virtually no gain, so there was little background hiss. When I moved to an SP-600 a year later, it sounded so noisy because there was all this hiss between stations. But the SP-600 was a much better receiver. Michael VE2BVW |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "carlos2007" wrote in message ... This is the question: Would you swap a Drake r8b for a Collins 51 S1? Why do I ask this? I have a Drake R8B and a Wellbrook 1530+ antenna, and pick up a lot ot QRM and noise S5 - 6 so I cannot do DX, I have tried with other antennas and the result is the same. I have read in other forums that receivers with valvel are less noiser and one owner of the Collins 51 s1 says that QRM and noises do not exist. Do you think that it is worth swapping it? Thanks. Any comments are very welcomed If you hear a noise increase when you attach your antenna (and I am certain you will), then a RX with a lower MDS wil be of no help. Dale W4OP |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you plug in the 51S-1 to the same antenna, you will likely hear the same
noise level. The R8B is a wonderful receiver that has a nice noise blanker and generally a better performer than the 51S-1. It is also easier to maintain. Colin K7FM |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
carlos2007 wrote:
This is the question: Would you swap a Drake r8b for a Collins 51 S1? Why do I ask this? I have a Drake R8B and a Wellbrook 1530+ antenna, and pick up a lot ot QRM and noise S5 - 6 so I cannot do DX, I have tried with other antennas and the result is the same. I have read in other forums that receivers with valvel are less noiser and one owner of the Collins 51 s1 says that QRM and noises do not exist. Do you think that it is worth swapping it? Thanks. Any comments are very welcomed From a purely economic point (nothing else), especially over time, the Collins will always be more valuable than the Drake. This assumes like condition of the two. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "carlos2007" wrote in message ... This is the question: Would you swap a Drake r8b for a Collins 51 S1? Why do I ask this? I have a Drake R8B and a Wellbrook 1530+ antenna, and pick up a lot ot QRM and noise S5 - 6 so I cannot do DX, I have tried with other antennas and the result is the same. I have read in other forums that receivers with valvel are less noiser and one owner of the Collins 51 s1 says that QRM and noises do not exist. Do you think that it is worth swapping it? Thanks. Any comments are very welcomed You need to try to reduce the QRM (man made). If you can run the radio from battery and make the noise go away by killing the mains, you have something to work on. If it is really QRN (nature's noise) that's just tough. That antenna has a preamp. Not always a good thing. The amplifier will amplify signal AND noise. If you are able to selectively bypass it, you will have more options. If there is too much noise and signal, all you do is risk the extra noise generated in the amplifier. The theory behind a loop, is that you lose some signal, but you can orient it to lose more noise, so you can hear signal that might be obliterated otherwise. It is best to have more of a wire antenna, high and in the clear to catch signal at the risk of catching more noise, so that you can switch back and forth for the best reception. Even fine painted wire for stealth is better than nothing. The fact of life, is that the ionosphere will either reflect the signal or absorb it and either you will hear it or not. QRN goes up and down. The Collins is a neat thing if you have room for both but I wouldn't swap them. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, JB wrote:
"carlos2007" wrote in message ... This is the question: Would you swap a Drake r8b for a Collins 51 S1? Why do I ask this? I have a Drake R8B and a Wellbrook 1530+ antenna, and pick up a lot ot QRM and noise S5 - 6 so I cannot do DX, I have tried with other antennas and the result is the same. I have read in other forums that receivers with valvel are less noiser and one owner of the Collins 51 s1 says that QRM and noises do not exist. Do you think that it is worth swapping it? Thanks. Any comments are very welcomed You need to try to reduce the QRM (man made). If you can run the radio from battery and make the noise go away by killing the mains, you have something to work on. If it is really QRN (nature's noise) that's just tough. That antenna has a preamp. Not always a good thing. The amplifier will amplify signal AND noise. If you are able to selectively bypass it, you will have more options. If there is too much noise and signal, all you do is risk the extra noise generated in the amplifier. The theory behind a loop, is that you lose some signal, but you can orient it to lose more noise, so you can hear signal that might be obliterated otherwise. It is best to have more of a wire antenna, high and in the clear to catch signal at the risk of catching more noise, so that you can switch back and forth for the best reception. Even fine painted wire for stealth is better than nothing. The fact of life, is that the ionosphere will either reflect the signal or absorb it and either you will hear it or not. QRN goes up and down. The Collins is a neat thing if you have room for both but I wouldn't swap them. And the Collins would be a big shock to anyone who grew up with modern solid state receivers. Tune 500KHz, shift the band, then tune another 500KHz, shift the band again. Lesser receivers of the period suffered from lots of things like not so great definition on the tuning dial, but you could tune a 2:1 range per band. Current synthesized receivers don't have different bands for the shortwave spectrum, it's done invisibly inside so you can tune from the top of the broadcast band to the 30MHz with one swoop of the tuning knob (well, numerous turns and more of them the finer the tuning steps, but no bandswitching needed). They also often have the ability to enter a frequency from a keypad, so you can jump easily to the general area you want to tune. Michael VE2BVW |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
carlos2007 wrote:
Would you swap a Drake r8b for a Collins 51 S1? Why do I ask this? I have a Drake R8B and a Wellbrook 1530+ antenna, and pick up a lot ot QRM and noise S5 - 6 so I cannot do DX, I have tried with other antennas and the result is the same. So, get an AM radio with a loopstick antenna, walk around the neighborhood, and see where the QRM is coming from. Then fix it. I have read in other forums that receivers with valvel are less noiser and one owner of the Collins 51 s1 says that QRM and noises do not exist. He doesn't have a touch lamp. If he had a touch lamp, he wouldn't be able to use his radio at all. It's true that radios with good filters and lots of dynamic range on the front end are better at dealing with QRM, but if you have an issue that is severe, you need to find it and fix it. Do you think that it is worth swapping it? No, because it doesn't solve the problem. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SWAP: Drake T4-X for SX-117 | Boatanchors | |||
SWAP: Drake T4-X for SX-117 | Equipment | |||
Yaesu, Drake, JRC FS or Swap | Equipment | |||
Swap Drake R8b for AOR AR 7030+ | Shortwave | |||
Swap Drake 4 Line | Swap |