Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 23, 2:22 pm, "Henry Kolesnik"
wrote: To me it looks like a radio out of a chicken coop with a label and some propaganda to make it seem like it's valuable.. So what if Fermi touched it?http://cgi.ebay.com/1949-University-...fters-SX-42-HI... -- Thanks & 73 Hank WD5JFR Biggest piece of Junk I ever saw. So Fermi touched, he touched plenty of other things that I would'nt buy either. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 25, 10:28*am, "Antonio Vernucci" wrote:
Can any one explain the rationale behind using both octal and loctal tubes in the SX-42? 73 Tony I0JX I don't think there was an obvious rationale behind some Hallicrafters tube lineup choices. The SX-110 was introduced in 1959 and made through the 60's, but was using metal octal tubes - reminiscent of the 1930's - when the rest of the world (and other Hallicrafters models) had switched to miniatures. Tim. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS Spare parts for Plessey PR-2250 receiver | Swap | |||
FS Spare parts for Plessey PR-2250 receiver | Shortwave | |||
FS Spare parts for Plessey PR-2250 receiver | Equipment | |||
FS Spare parts for Plessey PR-2250 receiver | Equipment | |||
FS Spare parts for Plessey PR-2250 receiver | Equipment |