Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am in the midst of restoring a Hallicrafters S-40A. I
think someone has changed the stop on the bandspread capacitor. AFAIK all H receivers have the bandspread set at 0 and this represents minimum capacitance. On this RX 0 has the bandspread cap completely closed and the frequency calibration can not be brought in. If set at minimum it sets up fine. There are other signs that the bandspread cap has been fooled with. I have seen one picture on the web which looks like the dial pullies have been strung to correct a similar problem. This is not what is shown in any of the S-40 series service material. My question is: will someone confirm that the S-40 series bandspread cap should be at minimum with the dial at 0 and has anyone else encountered this problem? The peg which forms the stop seems to be firm in its socket. If its sticking out on the wrong side I may have to restring the dial pullies to compensate. Thanks for any help. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Knoppow wrote:
I am in the midst of restoring a Hallicrafters S-40A. I think someone has changed the stop on the bandspread capacitor. AFAIK all H receivers have the bandspread set at 0 and this represents minimum capacitance. On this RX 0 has the bandspread cap completely closed and the frequency calibration can not be brought in. If set at minimum it sets up fine. There are other signs that the bandspread cap has been fooled with. I have seen one picture on the web which looks like the dial pullies have been strung to correct a similar problem. This is not what is shown in any of the S-40 series service material. My question is: will someone confirm that the S-40 series bandspread cap should be at minimum with the dial at 0 and has anyone else encountered this problem? The peg which forms the stop seems to be firm in its socket. If its sticking out on the wrong side I may have to restring the dial pullies to compensate. Thanks for any help. Short answer is yes, there's a mistake in some of the original literature that had the dial going the wrong way. Its been a while so I can't recall the specifics but it sounds as if you know the way to go with it. -Bill |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill M" wrote in message ... Richard Knoppow wrote: I am in the midst of restoring a Hallicrafters S-40A. I think someone has changed the stop on the bandspread capacitor. AFAIK all H receivers have the bandspread set at 0 and this represents minimum capacitance. On this RX 0 has the bandspread cap completely closed and the frequency calibration can not be brought in. If set at minimum it sets up fine. There are other signs that the bandspread cap has been fooled with. I have seen one picture on the web which looks like the dial pullies have been strung to correct a similar problem. This is not what is shown in any of the S-40 series service material. My question is: will someone confirm that the S-40 series bandspread cap should be at minimum with the dial at 0 and has anyone else encountered this problem? The peg which forms the stop seems to be firm in its socket. If its sticking out on the wrong side I may have to restring the dial pullies to compensate. Thanks for any help. Short answer is yes, there's a mistake in some of the original literature that had the dial going the wrong way. Its been a while so I can't recall the specifics but it sounds as if you know the way to go with it. -Bill Now I am confused, what is the "right" way? Should the dial string cross over at any point? on the stuff I have from the web its not shown that way. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is that the same as the S-40 (with out the A)? If so there is a stringing
diagram here on page 4: http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByM...7/M0008867.pdf I hope this helps. PP "Richard Knoppow" wrote in message m... I am in the midst of restoring a Hallicrafters S-40A. I think someone has changed the stop on the bandspread capacitor. AFAIK all H receivers have the bandspread set at 0 and this represents minimum capacitance. On this RX 0 has the bandspread cap completely closed and the frequency calibration can not be brought in. If set at minimum it sets up fine. There are other signs that the bandspread cap has been fooled with. I have seen one picture on the web which looks like the dial pullies have been strung to correct a similar problem. This is not what is shown in any of the S-40 series service material. My question is: will someone confirm that the S-40 series bandspread cap should be at minimum with the dial at 0 and has anyone else encountered this problem? The peg which forms the stop seems to be firm in its socket. If its sticking out on the wrong side I may have to restring the dial pullies to compensate. Thanks for any help. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul P" REMOVE paul @ REMOVE ppinyot . REMOVEcom wrote in message ... Is that the same as the S-40 (with out the A)? If so there is a stringing diagram here on page 4: http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByM...7/M0008867.pdf I hope this helps. PP My stuff snipped.... I think I have that info. All the service information I can find on the web shows straight dial stringing but I have had two replys indicating that some S-40 series require crossed stringing. There must have been some manufacturing error or change at some point but that info is probably lost. I will change the stringing on my RX since I don't think I can get the stop peg out without damaging the cap. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Knoppow" wrote in
m: I will change the stringing on my RX since I don't think I can get the stop peg out without damaging the cap. I really don't see why you have a problem. All the bandspread cap does is finetune a space around the center freq. To use it correctly, you leave it set at 50, and then you can finetune either up or down. The stringing will only affect which side is up or down. Obviously, you want less than 50 to be down, so string it so it gains capacitance (lowers frequency) as you tune down. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "elaich" wrote in message ... "Richard Knoppow" wrote in m: I will change the stringing on my RX since I don't think I can get the stop peg out without damaging the cap. I really don't see why you have a problem. All the bandspread cap does is finetune a space around the center freq. To use it correctly, you leave it set at 50, and then you can finetune either up or down. The stringing will only affect which side is up or down. Obviously, you want less than 50 to be down, so string it so it gains capacitance (lowers frequency) as you tune down. I think you don't understand the function of bandspread. Even though this is not a calibrated bandspread it does have definite position it must be in for the main dial to be calibratable. For most Hallicrafters receivers that is 0 on the dial representing minimum capacitance for the band spread capacitor. The main dial will not calibrate at any other value of capacitance. The trouble is that you are suggesting a sort of makeshift which would prevent the radio from working properly. The question is why was the capacitor made in such a way that it could not work properly if the dial stringing instructions for the receiver were followed and why some receivers of this model are one way and some another. Tha last two questions are probably beyond answering. Its possible that some person wanted the bandspread dial to start at 100 as it does for other brands of receivers and delibrately changed the position of the stop peg on the capacitor so that it rotates the wrong way. Its also possible there was some change made in production although I doubt that. In any case, since I have been unable to knock the peg out to replace it the other way. I will restring the dial system to reverse the rotation of the band spread capacitor. That will have the cap at minimum value when the dial indicates zero. The dial says on it to set at 0. So, even though I could simply calibrate it with the dial at 100 the markings would mislead someone else trying to use it. While makeshifts are sometimes necessary I really hate having to use them. Even the crossed stringing is a makeshift but I am afraid of damaging the capacitor and making the whole thing unusable if I apply too much force in trying to remove the stop peg. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Richard:
I think I know what the problem is - but this is only a guess. Both you and I have S-40A receivers where the bandspread capacitor has the lockout pin on the wrong side of the retaining plate. They both appear to be factory jobs, and the problem is that the receiver cannot be calibrated correctly. In all cases, the restringing technique is the same for the S-40, the S-40A and the S-40B. I think the only logical conclusion is that Hallicrafters received a number of capacitors that were manufactured defectively. They may have made them themselves, which means that they would waste the money in remaking them. Or, if a sub-contractor did it, they may have received a substantial price break. In either case, Hallicrafters made the conscious decision to use these defective capacitors and save money. By stringing these capcaitors like you suggest, everything will operate normally. And, there will not be a problem for years - or ever. I suspect that in both of our receivers, the bandspread string broke and required restringing. In both cases, the restringer strung it just as the service instructions specified - which is why they do not work correctly. Since the original change could not be observed (because the original string was broken), the restringer would not know of the problem. I think your solution is the only reasonable one. I suppose we should put a note inside the receiver, so that in 30 years, when the string breaks again, the same issue will not arise once more. Perhaps we could put our S-40A receivers on eBay and advertise them as unique or rare. Glad you posted this, as I was beginning to think I had simply been working on old radios far too long. 73, Colin K7FM |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also, I expect some bearing may be missing on your capacitor because someone
tried to "fix" it by the brute force method. I was tempted to try the same method. 73, Colin K7FM |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "COLIN LAMB" wrote in message m... Hello Richard: I think I know what the problem is - but this is only a guess. Both you and I have S-40A receivers where the bandspread capacitor has the lockout pin on the wrong side of the retaining plate. They both appear to be factory jobs, and the problem is that the receiver cannot be calibrated correctly. In all cases, the restringing technique is the same for the S-40, the S-40A and the S-40B. I think the only logical conclusion is that Hallicrafters received a number of capacitors that were manufactured defectively. They may have made them themselves, which means that they would waste the money in remaking them. Or, if a sub-contractor did it, they may have received a substantial price break. In either case, Hallicrafters made the conscious decision to use these defective capacitors and save money. By stringing these capcaitors like you suggest, everything will operate normally. And, there will not be a problem for years - or ever. I suspect that in both of our receivers, the bandspread string broke and required restringing. In both cases, the restringer strung it just as the service instructions specified - which is why they do not work correctly. Since the original change could not be observed (because the original string was broken), the restringer would not know of the problem. I think your solution is the only reasonable one. I suppose we should put a note inside the receiver, so that in 30 years, when the string breaks again, the same issue will not arise once more. Perhaps we could put our S-40A receivers on eBay and advertise them as unique or rare. Glad you posted this, as I was beginning to think I had simply been working on old radios far too long. 73, Colin K7FM I was able to find the right bearings (1/8th inch BTW) locally and replaced the missing ones. I crossed the string to the main pully and it works fine. However, I rather wonder if someone in the dear dead past may have written an artical suggesting a mod to make the band-spread dial run from 100 down as it does on many other receivers. Hallicrafters seems to have chosen to make their dials indicate relative capacitance, or, perhaps wavelength. Mine didn't need a new dial string, the original was there but the spring on the pully was gone and the string was just lying there. I was able to make a spring but cutting down a standard spring from the hardware store. When threaded as shown in the handbooks the string is just right, when crossed over its just a bit short but I could still use it. I rather wonder if someone perhaps published a mod for these receivers to make the band spread dial run the way it does in most other brands of receivers, i.e., 100 being the set point. The dial would then make sense in terms of frequency change, i.e., higher numbers indicating higher frequencies. I have no idea why Hallicrafters chose to number their band-spread dials oppositely, but they did. I may still try to remove the peg by drilling it out but I have other work to do on this guy so that will have to wait. Lots of caps to replace plus the power switch gave up the ghost tonight. I opened it and one of the little tabs was broken off. Perhaps I can find a replacement but, for the moment, I will probably mount a snap switch in the line cord (which I have to replace anyway. I think this RX has had a long and hard life and deserves some TLC at this point. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|