Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have any wisdom on substituting 6293's for 6146's? In this case
it's in the Kenwood Twins 599D. Any downside- neutralization etc? Tnx, Dale W4OP |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dale Parfitt" wrote in message ... Does anyone have any wisdom on substituting 6293's for 6146's? In this case it's in the Kenwood Twins 599D. Any downside- neutralization etc? Tnx, Dale W4OP No help at all here Some years back, maybe 1962-1963 I substituted 6293's for 6146's, and if I recall, the desired effect was it achieve higher plate current peaks in class C, AM modulated service. Homebrew rig was attempting to use negative peak clipping.......... remember when? I thought it worked quite well, but never did have the resources to try the same circuits with 6146's. Those were the days where anything worked with spectacular results on 10 or 15 meters. Europe, Asia, Orient, South Pacific were all easy ones at their time of the day!! Old Chief Lynn, W7LTQ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 7, 5:37*pm, "Dale Parfitt" wrote:
Does anyone have any wisdom on substituting 6293's for 6146's? In this case it's in the Kenwood Twins 599D. Any downside- neutralization etc? Tnx, Dale W4OP 6293 works even better. No problems found in my KWM2A |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
6146 amp | Homebrew | |||
WTB 6293 Tubes | Boatanchors | |||
WTB 6293 Tubes | Boatanchors | |||
RCA 6293 | Equipment | |||
RCA 6293 | Equipment |